Abstract
Thirty years ago, the imaging investigation of the liver and the biliary tree began with the plain x-ray. Nowadays it is considered less valuable since the ultrasound has become the modality of choice for their initial examination. The liver casts an appreciable shadow on a simple X-ray film. The hepatic shadow appears homogenous and is mostly formed by the right lobe. It is delineated at the right quadrant of the abdomen, though modified by individual variations of shape and orientation. Its outline is deduced due to contrast differences between the right lobe and the right hemidiaphragm and lung above, the preperitoneal fat line laterally, and the extraperitoneal fat and the kidney below. The liver lies approximately at the level of fifth intercostal space at the midclavicular line. The lower border extends to or slightly below the costal margin and should not cross the right psoas margin. The lower anterior edge of the liver that is the one clinically palpated is not directly seen on a plain film, but the gas in the right colon usually indicates its position
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gosink BB, Leymaster CE: Ultrasonic determination of hepatomegaly. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981; 9:37–41.
Niderau C, Sonnenberg A, Muller JE, et al.: Sonographic measurements of the normal liver, spleen, pancreas and portal vein. Radiology. 1983; 149:537–540.
Withers CE, Wilson SR: The liver. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, eds. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mosby; 1998;87–154.
Bryant TH, Blomley MJ, Albrecht T, et al: Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific micribubbles: prospective multicentrer study. Radiology. 2004; 232:420–430.
Niderau C, Muller JE, Sonnenberg A, et al: Extrahepatic bile ducts in helthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983; 11:23–27.
Behan M, Kazam E: Sonography of the common bile duct size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978; 130:701–709.
Wu CC, Ho YH, Chen CY: Effect of aging on common bile duct diameter: a real time ultrasonographic study. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984; 12:473–478.
Bucceri AM, Brogna A, Ferrara R: Common bile duct calibre following cholocystectomy: a two-year sonographic survey. Abdom Imag. 1994; 19:251–252.
Bressler EL, Rubin JM, McCracken S, et al: Sonographic parallel channel sign: a reappraisal. Radiology. 1987; 164:343–346.
Gallen PW, Filly RA: Ultrasonographic localization of the gallbladder. Radiology. 1979:133:678–691.
Worthen NJ, Uszler JM, Funamura JL: Cholocystitis: prospective evaluation of sonography and 99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981; 137:973–978.
Dodds WJ, Groh WJ, Darweesh RMA, et al: Sonographic measurement of gallbladder volume. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985; 145:1009–1011.
Meilstrup JW, Hopper KD, Thieme GA: Imaging of gallbladder variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991; 157:1205–1208.
Safadi RR, Abu-Yousef MM, Farah AS, et al: Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of gallbladder torsion: report of two cases. J Ultrasound Med; 1993; 12:296–298.
Lim GM, Jeffrey CS, Tolentino CS: Pancreatic pseudoaneurysm. Monitoring the success of transcatheter embolozation with duplex sonography. J Ultasound Med. 1989; 8:643–646.
Kubale R: Abdominal veins, portal venous system, and liver. In: Wolf KJ, Fobbe F, eds. Color duplex sonography. 1st ed New York, Thieme; 1995; 155–182.
Prokop M, van der Molen AJ: Liver. In: Prokop M, Galanski M eds. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Thieme; 2003; 405–475.
Kemmerer SR, Mortele KJ, Ros PR: CT scan of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998; 36:247–261.
Winter TC, Freeny PC, Ngheim HV, et al: Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: Evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. Radiology. 1995; 195:363–370.
Liddel RM, Baron RL, Ekstrom JE, et al: CT description of intrahepatic bile ducts. Radiology. 1990; 176:633–635.
Prokop M: Biliary tree. In: Prokop M, Galanski M eds. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Thieme; 2003; 405–475.
Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK: Liver and Biliary System: Evaluation by Multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am; 2005; 43:977–997.
Prando A, Wallace S, Bernandini ME, et al: Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver. Radiology; 1979; 130:679–701.
Kanematsu WA, Hoshi H, Imaeda T, et al: Detection and characterization of hepatic tumors: Value of combined helical CT hepatic arteriography and CT during arterial portography. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997; 168:1193–1198.
Lupetin AR, Cammisa BA, Beckman I, et al: Spiral CT during arterial portography. Radiographics; 1996; 16:723–743.
Sahani D, Saini S, Pena C et al: Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002; 179:53–59.
Lang H, Radtke A, Liu C, et al: Extended left hepatectomy: modified operation planning based on three-dimentional visulization of liver anatomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2004; 389:306–310.
Onodera Y, Omatsu T, Nakayama J, et al: Perpheral anatomic evaluation using three-dimentional CT hepatic venography in donors: significance of peripheral venous visualization in liver-donor liver transplantation. AJP Am J Roentgenol; 2004; 227:883–889.
Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ, et al: Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimentional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg; 2001; 233:221–226.
Shanmugam V, Beattie GC, Yule SR, et al. Is magnetic resonance cholangiopacreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br J Radiol; 2005; 78:888–893.
Mitchell DG, Burk DL Jr, Vinitski S, et al: The biophysical basis of tissue contrast in extracranial MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987; 149:831–837.
Heller SL, Lee VS: MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2005 May; 13:295–311.
Martin DR, Danrad R, Shahid MH: MR imaging of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am; 2005; 43:861–886.
Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, et al: Metallic artefacts on MR imaging of the postoperative spine: Reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology; 1994; 190:565–569.
McFarland EG, Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, et al: Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: Improved differantiation with heavily T2-waited conventional spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology; 1994; 193:43–47.
Balci NC, Semelka RC: Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am; 2005; 43:887–898.
Mitchell DG: Hepatobiliary contrast material: A magic bullet for sensitivity and specificity? Radiology; 1993; 188:21–22.
Mitchell DG: Hepatobiliary contrast material: A magic bullet for sensitivity and specificity? Radiology; 1993; 188:21–22.
Freitas ML, Bell RL, Duffy AJ: Choledocholithiasis: Evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol; 2006; 28:3162–3167.
Drane WE: Scintigraphic techniques for hepatic imaging. Update for 2000. Radiol Clin North Am; 1998; 36:309–318.
Drane WE: Hepatic imaging in diffuse liver disease. Clin Nucl Med; 1988; 13:182–185.
Brodsky RI, Friedman AC, Maurer AH, et al: Hepatig hemangioma: Diagnosis with 99mTc-labeled red cells and single photon emission CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987; 148:125–129.
Brown PH, Juni JE, Lieberman DA, et al: Hepatocyte versus biliary disease: a distinction by deconvolutional analysis of technetium-99m IDA time-activity curves. J Nucl Med; 1988; 29:623–630.
Weissmann HS, Gliedman ML, Wilk PJ, et al: Evaluation Of the postoperative patient with Tc-99m-IDA cholescintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med; 1982; 12:27–52
Warburg O: On the origin of cancer cells. Science; 1956; 123:309–314.
Pauwels EK, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JH, et al: FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol; 1998; 25:317–322.
Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW: 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinomaand other liver masses. J Nucl Med; 2003; 44:213–221.
Delbeke D, Vitola JV, Sandier MP et al: Staging recurrent metastatic colorectal carcinoma with PET. J nucl Med; 1997; 38:1196–1201.
Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, et al: Fluorodeoxy-glucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastointest Surg; 2004; 8:90–97.
Michels NA: Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation Am J Surg; 1966; 112:337–347.
Cardella JF, Amplatz K.: Preoperative angiographic evaluation of prospective liver recipients. Radiol Clin North Am; 1987; 25:299–308.
Martin M, Zajko AB, Orons PD, et al: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of variceal bleeding: Indications and clinical results. Surgery; 1993; 114:719–727.
Foley WD, Stewart ET, Milbrath JR, et al: Digital substraction angiography of the portal venous system. AJR Am J Roentgnenol; 1983; 140:497–499.
Cheng YF, Huang TL, Lee TY, et al: Variation of the intra-hepatic portal vein; angiographic demonstration and application in living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc; 1996; 28:1667–1668.
Khiari A, Navarro F, Fabre JM et al: Value of percutaneous hepatic biopsy in diagnosis of presumed bening tumors of the liver. Ann Chir 1996; 50:532–537.
Thanos L, Zormpala A, Papaioannou G, et al: Safety and efficacy of percutaneous CT-guided liver biopsy using an 18-gauge automated needle. Eur J Intern Med; 2000; 16:571–574.
Charboneau JW, Reading CC, and Welch TC: CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: current techniques and new innovations. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990; 154:1–10.
Shankar S, van Sonnenberg E, Silverman SG, Tuncali K: Intervenional radiology procedures in the liver: Biopsy, Drainage, and Ablation. Clin Liver Disease; 2002; 6:91–118.
Fernandez MP, Murphy FB: Hepatic biopsies and fluid drainages. Radiol Clin North Am; 1991; 29:1311–1328.
Silverman SG, Deuson TE, Kane N et al: Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: Cost-identification analysis. Radiology 1998; 206:429–435.
Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W: New needle foe MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:380–382.
Tobin MV, Gilmore IT: Plugged liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. Dig Dis Sci; 1989; 34:13–15.
Little AF, Ferris JV, Dodd GD, Baron RL: Image-guided percutaneous hepatic biopsy: Effect of ascites on the complication rate. Radiology; 1996; 199:79–83.
Welch TJ, Sheepy PF II, Jonson CD et al: CT-guided biopsy: Prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures. Radiology; 1989; 171:493–496.
Chevallier P, Dausse F, Berthier F, et al: Transjugular liver biopsy: prospective evaluation of the angle formed between the hepatic veins and the vena cava main axis and modification of a semi-automated biopsy device in cases of an unfavorable angle. Eur Radiol. 2006 May 9 [Epub ahead of print].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thanos, L., Mylona, S. (2006). Imaging Studies of the Liver. In: Karaliotas, C.C., Broelsch, C.E., Habib, N.A. (eds) Liver and Biliary Tract Surgery. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-49277-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-49277-2_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-49275-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-49277-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)