Skip to main content

Neglected Functions of Normative Political Theory in Empirical Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Klaus von Beyme

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice ((BRIEFSPIONEER,volume 14))

  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

The theory of politics began as a part of ethics. Plato dealt with politics and ethics in the same book. Aristotle began to separate the two fields but nevertheless close links remained: ethics was the more static, politics the dynamic side of the same coin. On the continent, political theories after 1945 were frequently subsumed under three labels: the empirical-analytical school, the dialectical school, and the neo-Aristotelian school. The last two labels pointed to predominantly normative theories. Nevertheless, normative theory was an outsider in the grand debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text was first presented at the University of Vienna as “Revival of normative theory in empirical research” and has not previously been published.

References

  • Apel, Karl-Otto, 1989: “Normative Begründung der ‘Kritischen Theorie durch Rekurs auf lebensweltliche Sittlichkeit?, in: Honneth, Axel et al. (Eds.): Zwischenbetrachtungen im Prozeß der Aufklärung. Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp): 15–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballestrem, Karl Graf; Ottmann, Henning (Eds.), 1990: Politische Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts (Munich: Oldenbourg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin, 1984: Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, Stefano; D’Alimonte, Roberto (Eds.), 1995: Maggioritario ma non Troppo (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 1974: Objektivität und Normativität. Die Theorie-Praxis-Debatte in der modernen deutschen und amerikanischen Soziologie (Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, 1993: Die Erfindung des Politischen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Danie, 1960, 1966: The End of Ideology (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel, 1993: Communitarianism and Its Critics (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von, 1988: “Die Rolle der Theoriegeschichte in der modernen Politik-wissen-schaft: das Beispiel Amerikas”, in: Beyme, Klaus von (Ed.): Der Vergleich in der Politik-wissen-schaft (Munich: Piper): 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von, 31996, 42007: Theorie der Politik im 20. Jahrhundert. Von der Moderne zur Postmoderne (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von; Offe, Claus (Eds.), 1996: “Politische Theorien in der Ära der Transformation, in: PVS Sonderheft, Vol. 26. (Opladen: Westdeutscher).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto, 1989: Democracy and Dictatorship (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jean L.; Arato, Andrew, 31995: Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua; Walzer, Michael, 1986: “Spheres of Justice” (Book Review), in: The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua; Rogers, Joel, 1992: “Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance”, in: Politics and Society, 4 (special issue): 393–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua; Rogers, Joel, 1994: “Solidarity, Democracy, Association”, in: Streeck, Wolfgang (Ed.): Staat und Verbände. PVS special issue 25 (Opladen: Westdeutscher): 136–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, P., 1993: “Demokratie und Policy-Analyse”, in: Héritier, Adrienne (Ed.): Policy-Analyse. PVS special issue 24 (Opladen: Westdeutscher): 471–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony, 1957: An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai, 1993: The Spirit of Community (New York: Crown Publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerecke, Uwe, 1995: “John Rawls’ Beitrag zu einer Theorie der modernen Gesellschaft”, in: Pies, Ingo; Leschke, Ingo (Eds.): John Rawls’ politischer Liberalismus (Tübingen: Mohr): 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E., 1992: Motivating Political Morality (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen, 1981: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 2 (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen, 21988: “Entgegnung, in: Honnet”, Axel; Joas, Hans (Eds.): Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp): 327–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, 1989: Political Theory and the Modern State (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, 1992: Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel, 1981: American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, Wolfgang, 1996: Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags (Darmstadt: Primus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will, 1990: Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, Clausjohann, 1990: Kritik der Theorie der partizipatorischen Demokratie (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas, 1993: Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair, 1981: After Virtue (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl, 1952: Ideologie und Utopie (Frankfurt: Schulte-Bulmke).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington, 1978: Injustice. The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, Frieder, 1969: Organisation und Demokratie (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Onora, 1996: Towards Justice and Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Bernhard, 1993: Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, D. C., 1976: Holistic Thought in Social Science (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, David M., 1984: The Tragedy of Political Science. Politics, Scholarship and Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödel, Ulrich et al., 1989: Die demokratische Frage (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine, George, 1989: “What Is Political Theory?”, in: Gould, J. A.; Thursby, V. V. (Eds.): Contemporary Political Thought (New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1994: Comparative Constitutional Engineering (Houndsmill: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer, 1995: Reflexive Demokratie (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, Eric, 21965: Die neue Wissenschaft der Politik (Munich: Pustet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael, 1983: Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus von Beyme .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Beyme, K. (2014). Neglected Functions of Normative Political Theory in Empirical Research. In: Klaus von Beyme. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01535-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics