Skip to main content

The Efficacy of Trust-Building Tactics in Construction Dispute Mediation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Construction Dispute Research

Abstract

Distrust hinders disputing parties and mediators from achieving mediation success. Mediators therefore often use trust-building tactics to generate some degree of trust in themselves and in the mediation process. This chapter reports a study that identified the trust-building tactics used by construction mediators and examined the efficacy of these tactics with respect to their outcomes. Three study stages were designed. With reference to the mediation model of Sloan (1998), trust-building tactics and outcomes were first identified in Stage I. Next, the data were collected from accredited mediators with a questionnaire survey in Stage II. The collected data were then validated via reliability assessments in Stage III. With the use of multiple regression analyses, the efficacy of the trust-building tactics was examined by relating these tactics to their outcomes. The findings of this study suggest that the trust-building tactics used in Step 4 (i.e., explore interests) of Sloan's mediation model (1998) are influential in developing trust among disputing parties and that they can also act as a time-saving tool in the mediation process. Furthermore, it was found that mediators can earn trust by adopting the trust-building tactics used in Step 3 (i.e., issues and trust) of Sloan’s model (1998). These tactics can also serve to improve the relationships between the disputing parties. The results show that the trust-building tactics used in the final step (i.e., solutions) of Sloan’s model (1998) seem to have low efficacy in developing trust among disputing parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bercovitch, J., & Derouen, K. (2004). Mediation in internationalized ethnic conflicts: Assessing the determinants of a successful process. Armed Forces and Society, 30(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock, M. D. (2001). Where is the trust? Using trust-based mediation for first nations dispute resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulle, L. (2001). Mediation skills and techniques. Sydney: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (1997). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P. J. D. (1986). Strategic choice in mediation. Negotiation Journal, January, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P. J. D., Lim, R. G., & McLaughlin, M. E. (1989). Contingent mediator behavior and its effectiveness. In K. Krussel, & D. G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research—the process and effectiveness of third-party intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W. (2007). Insight into resolving construction disputes by mediation/adjudication in Hong Kong. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 133(2), 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W. (1992). Resolving construction disputes by mediation: Hong Kong experience. Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 8(4), 384–392.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeks, J. R. (2003). Multistep dispute resolution in design and construction industry. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 129(2), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. O., & Yiu, T. W. (2007). A study of construction mediator tactics—part I: Taxonomies of dispute sources, mediator tactics and mediation outcomes. Building and Environment, 42(2), 752–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., & Yeung, S. F. (2006). A study of styles and outcomes in construction dispute negotiation. Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient α and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(2), 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (1997). Social trust and human communities. Kingston, Ont: McGill- Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(3), 200–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, C. Y. (2006). The common problems and suggested solutions of mediation in the construction industry in Hong Kong. Surveyors Times, The Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, 4, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, T. R., & Brown, J. K. (1995). Focus on psychometrics. Ten measurement commandments that often should be broken. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(6), 465–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. M. (1985). To be a mediator: Expressive tactics in mediation. Journal of Social Issues, 41(2), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latz, M. E. (2001). Give and take: In mediation, it is important to negotiate effectively with the mediator. ABA Journal, 87, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S., Hang, Y. N., & Hon, A. H. Y. (2006). Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: Mediating roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research, 59, 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. P. (2001). Recipe for success in construction mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal, 56(2), 16.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. W. (1996). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetzel, J. G. (1998). The effects of self-control and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem, R. (2003). Trust in mediation. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/trust_mediation/

  • Settle, J. (1998). The element of trust in mediation: Practice pointers drawn from theory. Retrieved from http://www.convenor.com/madison/trust.htm

  • Sharland, A. (2001). The negotiation process as a predictor of relationship outcomes in international buyer-supplier arrangements. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(7), 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, G. (1998). Turning conflict into consensus: Mediation theory. In C. Darling (ed.) Process and skills. Continuing Legal Education Society: Vancouver, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D., & Norman, G. (1997). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Striengnitz, M. (2006). Conflicts over coastal protection in a National Park: Mediation and negotiated law making. Land Use Policy, 23, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & Ozawa, C. (1983). Mediated negotiation in the public sector: Mediator accountability and the public interest problem. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, R. (1991). Improving the quality of internal evaluation: The evaluator as consultant-mediator. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, T. W., & Cheung, S. O. (2007). A study of construction mediator tactics—part II: The contingent use of tactics. Building and Environment, 42(2), 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Wai Ying Lai for collecting data for the study. The content of this chapter has been published in Volume 135(8) of the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management is used with the permission from ASCE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tak Wing Yiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yiu, T.W. (2014). The Efficacy of Trust-Building Tactics in Construction Dispute Mediation. In: Cheung, S. (eds) Construction Dispute Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04428-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04429-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics