Skip to main content

Clues to Understanding the Phylogeny of Behavioral Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Myth of Executive Functioning

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Neuroscience ((TVOBTP))

  • 1730 Accesses

Abstract

Any living organism has, by definition, successfully adapted to its environment. And, broadly speaking, success leaves behind its clues. Reviewing the “duties” of the vertebrate brain provides these clues. According to Ito [149], the vertebrate brain has five basic duties. These duties are common to all vertebrate organisms, from fish to humans. First, there are autonomic and somatic reflexes and second, there are compound movements such as posture, breathing, saccadic eye movements, and locomotion. Many aspects of these functions are mediated by neural activity within the spinal cord and the brainstem. Third, functions such as nutrient intake or feeding, drinking, “fight or flight” mechanisms, and sexual behaviors are all essential to survival and are mediated through the activity of the hypothalamus and limbic system. Many of these behaviors are innate and automatic, demonstrating the adaptive value of automaticity and the lack of the requirement of conscious cognitive control. The speed with which these basic functions operate is quite impressive. The fourth function of the vertebrate brain concerns cerebral, or cortical, sensorimotor activity, as observed in the development of birds and mammals. The sensorimotor regions occupy significant areas within the neocortex, while the activities of mammals, including humans, require the integrated interactions between the cerebral hemispheres, the basal ganglia, and the cerebellum. In this regard, large regions of the cortex are recruited when engaging in activities that are not “cognitive.” Fifth, cerebral association functions developed in primates. These functions, which include thought, are represented within approximately three-fourths of the human neocortex. While the cortex significantly expanded during the course of evolution, a parallel expansion is observed in the cerebellum, with increasing and new cerebro-cerebellar circuitry systems observed as we ascend the phylogenetic scale [150–154]. The expansion of the striatum is considered to be proportional to that of the neocortex in all vertebrates, but in the human brain, the progression of the neocortex greatly outweighs striatal expansion [155]. However, the striatum receives direct projections from all major cortical association regions with the exception of primary visual cortex. The ratio of inputs are as high as 20,000 cortical association neurons to 1 medium spiny cell striatal neuron [156]. This input anatomy provides a substrate for a wide variety of contextual information to be made available to the striatum, enabling the basal ganglia to generalize by recognizing patterns [157]. Finally, it is also notable that higher-order control functions which are presumably dependent upon the neocortex operate much more slowly [149, 158–162].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Toates, F., Evolutionary psychology - towards a more integrative model. Biol. Philos., 2005. 20(2-3): p. 305-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koziol, L.F., D.E. Budding, and D. Chidekel, Adaptation, expertise, and giftedness: towards an understanding of cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar network contributions. Cerebellum, 2010. 9(4): p. 499-529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito, M., Cerebellar microcomplexes. Int Rev Neurobiol, 1997. 41: p. 475-87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smaers, J.B., J. Steele, and K. Zilles, Modeling the evolution of cortico-cerebellar systems in primates. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2011. 1225: p. 176-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramnani, N., The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2006. 7(7): p. 511-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoodley, C.J. and J.D. Schmahmann, The cerebellum and language: evidence from patients with cerebellar degeneration. Brain Lang, 2009. 110(3): p. 149-53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmahmann, J.D., An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. Arch Neurol, 1991. 48(11): p. 1178-87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Middleton, F.A. and P.L. Strick, Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. Science, 1994. 266(5184): p. 458-61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Divac, I. and O. Oberg, Subcortical mechanisms in cognition, in Neuropsychological disorders associated with subcortical lesions, G. Vallar, S.F. Cappa, and C.-W. Wallesch, Editors. 1992, Oxford University Press: Oxford; New York. p. 42-60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Houk, J.C., Agents of the mind. Biol Cybern, 2005. 92(6): p. 427-37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seger, C.A., How do the basal ganglia contribute to categorization? Their roles in generalization, response selection, and learning via feedback. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2008. 32(2): p. 265-78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito, M., The cerebellum: brain for an implicit self. 2011, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: FT Press. ix, 285 p., 16 p. of plates.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toates, F., A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Conscious Cogn, 2006. 15(1): p. 75-118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shadmehr, R., et al., Temporal discounting of reward and the cost of time in motor control. Journal of Neuroscience, 2010. 30(31): p. 10507-10516.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shadmehr, R., M.A. Smith, and J.W. Krakauer, Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2010. 33: p. 89-108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Imamizu, H., Prediction of sensorimotor feedback from the efference copy of motor commands: A review of behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies. Japanese Psychological Research, 2010. 52(2): p. 107-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson, H., On the nature of the duality of the brain. Brain J. Neurol., 1915. 38: p. 80-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Panksepp, J., Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. 1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolb, B. and I.Q. Whishaw, Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. 6th ed. 2009, New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Konicarova, J. and P. Bob, Principle of dissolution and primitive reflexes in adhd. Activas Nervosa Superior, 2013. 55(1-2): p. 74-78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koziol, L.F. (2014). Clues to Understanding the Phylogeny of Behavioral Control. In: The Myth of Executive Functioning. SpringerBriefs in Neuroscience(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04477-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics