Skip to main content

Bayesian FE Model Updating in the Presence of Modeling Errors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3

Abstract

A new likelihood function is proposed for probabilistic damage identification of civil structures that are usually modeled with many simplifying assumptions and idealizations. Data from undamaged and damaged states of the structure are used in the likelihood function and damage is identified through a Bayesian finite element (FE) model updating process. The new likelihood function does not require calibration of an initial FE model to a baseline/reference model and is based on the difference between damaged and healthy state data. It is shown that the proposed likelihood function can identify structural damage as accurately as two other types of likelihood functions frequently used in the literature. The proposed likelihood is reasonably accurate in the presence of modeling error, measurement noise and data incompleteness (number of modes and number of sensors). The performance of FE model updating for damage identification using the proposed likelihood is evaluated numerically at multiple levels of modeling errors and structural damage. The effects of modeling errors are simulated by generating identified modal parameters from a model that is different from the FE model used in the updating process. It is observed that the accuracy of damage identifications can be improved by using the identified modes that are less affected by modeling errors and by assigning optimum weights between the eigen-frequency and mode shape errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rytter A (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Building and Technology and Structural Engineering of Aalborg University, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR (2003) A review on structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Technical report annex to SAMCO summer academy, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems for changes in their vibration characteristics. Technical report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carden EP, Fanning P (2004) Damage detection and health monitoring of large space structures. Struct Health Monit 3:355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farhat C, Hemez FM (1993) Updating finite element dynamic models using element by element sensitivity methodology. AIAA J 31(9):1702–1711

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (1995) FE model updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. ASCE J Eng Mech 124(4):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanayei M, McClain JAS, Wadia-Fascetti S, Santini EM (1999) Parameter estimation incorporating modal data and boundary condition. J Struct Eng 125(9):1048–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mottershad JE, Link M, Friswell MI (2011) The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2275–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teughles A, De Roeck G (2004) Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating. J Sound Vib 278(3):589–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huth O, Feltrin G, Maeck J, Kilic N, Motavalli M (2005) Damage identification using modal data: experiences on prestressed concrete bridge. J Struct Eng 131(12):1898–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reynders E, De Roeck D, Bakir PG, Sauvage C (2007) Damage identification on the Tilff Bridge by vibration monitoring using optical fiber strain sensors. J Eng Mech 133(2):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moaveni B, He X, Conte JP, Restrepo JI (2010) Damage identification study of a seven-story full-scale building slice tested on the UCSD-NEES shake table. Struct Saf 32(5):347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moaveni B, Behmanesh I (2012) Effects of changing ambient temperature on finite element model updating of the Dowling Hall Footbridge. Eng Struct 43:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Behmanesh I, Moaveni B (2013) Probabilistic damage identification of the Dowling Hall Footbridge using Bayesian FE model updating. In: Proceedings of 31st International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC-XXXI), Garden Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  16. SAC (2000) State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking. FEMA 355C report, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beck JL, Au SK, Vanik MW (2001) Monitoring structural health using a probabilistic measure. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng 16:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuen KV, Beck JL, Au SK (2004) Structural damage detection and assessment by adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Contr Health Monit 11:327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ching J, Beck JL (2004) New Bayesian model updating algorithm applied to a structural health monitoring benchmark. Struct Health Monit 3:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mthembu L, Marwala T, Friswell ML, Adhikari S (2011) Model selection in finite element model updating using the Bayesian evidence statistics. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2399–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goller B, Beck JL, Schueller GI (2012) Evidence-based identification of weighting factors in Bayesian model updating using modal data. J Eng Mech 138:430–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haralampidis Y, Papadimitriou C, Pavlidou, M (2005) Multi-objective framework for structural model identification. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34:665–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of this study by the National Science Foundation Grant No. 1125624 which was awarded under the Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering (BRIGE) program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Moaveni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Behmanesh, I., Moaveni, B. (2014). Bayesian FE Model Updating in the Presence of Modeling Errors. In: Atamturktur, H., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C., Schoenherr, T. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04552-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04552-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04551-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04552-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics