Skip to main content

On Developing a Web-Based Time Preference Elicitation Engine: Implications for E - Negotiations

  • Conference paper
Group Decision and Negotiation. A Process-Oriented View (GDN 2014)

Abstract

In electronic negotiations, buyers and sellers are represented by negotiating agents and it becomes imperative for the negotiating agents to acquire user’s preferences to be able to negotiate better. In this paper we present the design of a web based engine to capture a buyer’s choices over time through a preference elicitation tool known as Time – Tradeoff sequence(TTO Sequence). Preferences thus elicited are used by buyer’s electronic agents to negotiate price and date of movie tickets with cineplex owners. Further, we illustrate with an example that negotiation outcome is affected by the time-preference of the buyer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attema, A.E., Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K.I., Wakker, P.: Time-tradeoff sequences for analyzing discounting and time inconsistency. Management Science 56(11), 2015–2030 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bichler, M., Kersten, G., Strecker, S.: Towards a structured design of electronic negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation 12(4), 311–335 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bichler, M.: The Future of eMarkets: Multi-Dimensional Market Mechanisms. University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K.I., Wakker, P.P.: Non-hyperbolic time inconsistency. Games and Economic Behavior 66(1), 27–38 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, D.N., Jeng, B., Lee, W.P., Chuang, C.H.: An agent-based model for consumer-to-business electronic commerce. Expert Systems with Applications 34(1), 469–481 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clemen, R.T.: Making Hard Decisions: An introduction to decision analysis, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Belmontm (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence 152(1), 1–45 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40(2), 351–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gimpel, H., Jennings, N.R., Kersten, G.E., Ockenfels, A., Weinhardt, C.: Market engineering: A research agenda. In: Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering, pp. 1–15. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, C.C., Liang, W.Y., Lai, Y.H., Lin, Y.C.: The agent-based negotiation process for b2c e-commerce. Expert Systems with Applications 37(1), 348–359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kersten, G.E., Lai, H.: Negotiation support and e-negotiation systems: an overview. Group Decision and Negotiation 16(6), 553–586 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kersten, G.E., Kowalczyk, R., Lai, H., Neumann, D., Chhetri, M.B.: Shaman: Software and human agents in multiattribute auctions and negotiations. In: Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering, pp. 116–149. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, K.C., Lee, H., Lee, N.: Agent based mobile negotiation for personalized pricing of last minute theatre tickets. Expert Systems with Applications 39(10), 9255–9263 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D.: Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 573–597 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maes, P., Guttman, R.H., Moukas, A.G.: Agents that buy and sell. Communications of the ACM 42(3), 81–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samuelson, P.A.: A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies 4(2), 155–161 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sayman, S., Onculer, A.: An investigation of time inconsistency. Management Science 55(3), 470–482 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundarraj, R.P., Mok, W.W.H.: Models for human negotiation elements: Validation and implications for electronic procurement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58(3), 412–430 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vetschera, R.: Preference structures and negotiator behavior in electronic negotiations. Decision Support Systems 44(1), 135–146 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pahuja, A., Krishnaswamy, V., Sundarraj, R.P. (2014). On Developing a Web-Based Time Preference Elicitation Engine: Implications for E - Negotiations. In: Zaraté, P., Kersten, G.E., Hernández, J.E. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation. A Process-Oriented View. GDN 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 180. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07179-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07179-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07178-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07179-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics