Skip to main content

On Low Treewidth Graphs and Supertrees

  • Conference paper
Algorithms for Computational Biology (AlCoB 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 8542))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Compatibility of unrooted phylogenetic trees is a well studied problem in phylogenetics. It asks to determine whether for a set of k input trees T 1,...,T k there exists a larger tree (called a supertree) that contains the topologies of all k input trees. When any such supertree exists we call the instance compatible and otherwise incompatible. It is known that the problem is NP-hard and FPT, although a constructive FPT algorithm is not known. It has been shown that whenever the treewidth of an auxiliary structure known as the display graph is strictly larger than the number of input trees, the instance is incompatible. Here we show that whenever the treewidth of the display graph is at most 2, the instance is compatible. Furthermore, we give a polynomial-time algorithm to construct a supertree in this case. Finally, we demonstrate both compatible and incompatible instances that have display graphs with treewidth 3, highlighting that the treewidth of the display graph is (on its own) not sufficient to determine compatibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aho, A., Sagiv, Y., Szymanski, T., Ullman, J.: Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM Journal on Computing 10(3), 405–421 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bininda-Emonds, O.: Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodlaender, H.L., Koster, A.M.C.A.: Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds. Information and Computation 208(3), 259–275 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant, D., Lagergren, J.: Compatibility of unrooted phylogenetic trees is FPT. Theoretical Computer Science 351(3), 296–302 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Courcelle, B.: he monadic second-order logic of graphs. I. Recognizable sets of finite graphs. Information and Computation 85(1), 12–75 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory. Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Company KG (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Koolen, J.: Basic Phylogenetic Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganapathy, G., Warnow, T.J.: Approximating the complement of the maximum compatible subset of leaves of k trees. In: Jansen, K., Leonardi, S., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) APPROX 2002. LNCS, vol. 2462, pp. 122–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Grünewald, S., Humphries, P.J., Semple, C.: Quartet compatibility and the quartet graph. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 15(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gysel, R., Stevens, K., Gusfield, D.: Reducing problems in unrooted tree compatibility to restricted triangulations of intersection graphs. In: Raphael, B., Tang, J. (eds.) WABI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7534, pp. 93–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Semple, C., Steel, M.: Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steel, M.: The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees. Journal of Classification 9(1), 91–116 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF02618470

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Vakati, S., Fernández-Baca, D.: Graph triangulations and the compatibility of unrooted phylogenetic trees. Applied Mathematics Letters 24(5), 719–723 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Vakati, S., Fernández-Baca, D.: Characterizing compatibility and agreement of unrooted trees via cuts in graphs. CoRR abs/1307.7828 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grigoriev, A., Kelk, S., Lekić, N. (2014). On Low Treewidth Graphs and Supertrees. In: Dediu, AH., Martín-Vide, C., Truthe, B. (eds) Algorithms for Computational Biology. AlCoB 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8542. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07953-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07953-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07952-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07953-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics