Abstract
In this research study, energy, exergy and exergo-economic analysis of Montazer Ghaem gas turbine power plant which is located near Tehran, capital city of Iran is carried out. The results of this study reveal that the highest exergy destruction occurs in the combustion chamber (CC), where the large temperature difference is the major source of the irreversibility. In addition, the effects of the gas turbine load variations and ambient temperature are investigated to see how system performance changes: the gas turbine is significantly affected by the ambient temperature which leads to a decrease in net power output. The results of the load variation of the gas turbine show that a reduction in gas turbine load results in a decrease in the exergy efficiency of the cycle as well as all the components. As was expected, an increase in ambient temperature has a negative effect on the exergy efficiency of the cycle, so this factor could be countered by using gas turbine air inlet cooling methods. In addition, an exergo-economic analysis is conducted to determine the cost of exergy destruction in each component and to determine the cost of fuel. The results show that combustion chamber has the largest cost of exergy destruction, which is in line with the exergy analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method in thermal plant analysis. Butterworths, London
Moran MJ, Shapiro HN (2000) Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Facchini B, Fiaschi D, Manfrida G (2000) Exergy analysis of combined cycles using latest generation gas turbine. ASME J Engrg Gas Turbine Power 122:233–238
Bassily AM (2005) Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle. Int J Energy 32(5):778–794
Song TW, Sohn JL, Kim JH, Kim TS, Ro ST (2002) Exergy-based performance analysis of the heavy duty gas turbine in part-load operating condition. Int J Exergy 2:105–112
Ebadi MJ, Gorji-Bandpy M (2005) Exergetic analysis of gas turbine plants. Int J Exergy 2(4):31–39
Ahmadi P, Abadi A, Ghaffarizadeh AR, Naghib I (2008) Effect of Fog inlet air cooling method on combined cycle power plant output power. 16th Annual (International) Conference on Mechanical Engineering-ISME. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran
Dincer I, Rosen MA (1999) Energy environment and sustainable development. Appl Energy 64:427–440
Cihan A, Hacıhafızoglu O, Kahveci K (2006) Energy-exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a combined-cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 30:115–126
Ahmadi P, Rosen MA, Dincer I (2011) Greenhouse gas emission and exergo environmental analyses of a trigeneration energy system. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:1540–1549
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M (1996) Thermal design and optimization. Wiley, New York
Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Hamidi A (2009) Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant (a case study). Int J Energy Res 33:499–512
Ameri M, Enadi N (2012) Thermodynamic modeling and second law based performance analysis of a gas turbine power plant (exergy and exergoeconomic analysis). J Power Technol 92(3):183–191
Sahoo PK (2008) Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a cogeneration system using evolutionary programming. Appl Therm Eng 28(13):1580–1588
Ahmadi P, Dincer I (2011) Thermodynamic analysis and thermoeconomic optimization of a dual pressure combined cycle power plant with a supplementary firing unit. Energy Convers Manag 52(5):2296–2308
Roosen P, Uhlenbruck S, Lucas K (2003) Pareto optimization of a combined cycle power system as a decision support tool for trading off investment vs. operating costs. Int J Therm Sci 42:553–560
Ahmadi P, Barzegar Avval H, Ghaffarizadeh A, Saidi MH (2011) Thermo economic-environmental multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant with preheater using evolutionary algorithm. Int J Energy 35(5):389–403
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- \( \dot{C} \) :
-
Cost per unit of exergy ($/MJ)
- \( {\dot{C}}_D \) :
-
Cost of exergy destruction ($/h)
- CRF :
-
Capital recovery factor
- ex :
-
Specific exergy (kJ/kg)
- \( \dot{e}x \) :
-
Specific exergy rate (kW/kg)
- \( \dot{E}x \) :
-
Exergy flow rate (kW)
- h :
-
Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
- LHV :
-
Lower heating value (kJ/kg)
- \( \dot{m} \) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg/s)
- P:
-
Pressure (kPa)
- \( \dot{Q} \) :
-
Heat transfer rate (kW)
- R :
-
Gas constant (kJ/kg K)
- s:
-
Specific entropy (kJ/kg K)
- T:
-
Temperature (K)
- \( \dot{W} \) :
-
Work transfer rate (kW)
- \( \dot{Z} \) :
-
Capital cost rate ($/s)
- Z k :
-
Component purchase cost ($)
- η ex :
-
Exergy efficiency
- φ :
-
Maintenance factor
- ξ :
-
Coefficient of fuel chemical exergy
- C :
-
Compressor
- CC :
-
Combustion chamber
- ch :
-
Chemical
- D :
-
Destruction
- e :
-
Exit condition
- GT :
-
Gas turbine
- f :
-
Fuel
- i :
-
Inlet Condition
- k :
-
Component
- ph :
-
Physical
- 0 :
-
Reference ambient condition
- â‹…:
-
Rate
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mousafarash, A., Ahmadi, P. (2014). Exergy and Exergo-Economic Based Analysis of a Gas Turbine Power Generation System. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07976-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07977-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)