Abstract
What do we mean by good healthcare, and do machines threaten it? If good care requires expertise, then what kind of expertise is this? If good care is “human” care, does this necessarily mean “non-technological” care? If not, then what should be the precise role of machines in medicine and healthcare? This chapter argues that good care relies on expert know-how and skills that enable care givers to care-fully engage with patients. Evaluating the introduction of new technologies such as robots or expert systems then requires us to ask how the technologies impact on the “know-how” expertise of care givers, and whether they encourage a less care-full way of doing things. What role should which technologies play in which tasks and practices? Can we design and use them in such a way that they promote care-full and engaged ways of doing things with people? It is concluded that new machines require new skills to handle the technology but also and especially new knowing-how to handle people: knowing how to be care-full and caring with the technology. Good care is not about something external called “ethics” but about how things are done in medical and care practices. Machines are welcome if they contribute to this more knowledgeable, skillful, participatory, engaged, and caring way of doing things. This vision of good care enables us to evaluate new technologies and encourages care givers, care receivers, and other stakeholders to explore better ways of designing, regulating, and using them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Benner P (2004) Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bull Sci Technol Soc 24(3):188–199
Borgmann A (1984) Technology and the character of contemporary life: a philosophical inquiry. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Coeckelbergh M (2013) E-Care as craftsmanship: virtuous work, skilled engagement, and information technology in healthcare. Med Healthc Philos (on-line first)
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL (1980) A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in direct skill acquisition. Report. Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1991) Towards a phenomenology of ethical expertise. Hum Stud 14(4):229–250
Moor JH (2006) The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):18–21
Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2010) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40
Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind Mach 16:141–161
Whitby B (2012) Do you want a robot lover? In: Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (eds) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents series. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 233–249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Good Healthcare Is in the “How”: The Quality of Care, the Role of Machines, and the Need for New Skills. In: van Rysewyk, S., Pontier, M. (eds) Machine Medical Ethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 74. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08107-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08108-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)