Skip to main content

Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Surrogate Modeling and Engineering Design Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Solving Computationally Expensive Engineering Problems

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 97))

Abstract

Computer simulation models are fundamental tools of contemporary engineering design. The components, structures, and systems considered in most engineering disciplines are far too complex to be accurately described using simple theoretical models. Therefore, numerical simulation is often the only way to evaluate the performance of the design with sufficient reliability. However, accurate, high-fidelity simulations are computationally expensive. Consequently, their use for design automation, especially when exploiting conventional optimization algorithms is often prohibitive. Availability of faster computers and more efficient simulation software does not always translate into computational speedup due to growing demand for improved accuracy and the need to evaluate larger and larger systems. Surrogate-based optimization (SBO) techniques belong to the most promising approaches capable of alleviating these difficulties. SBO allows for reducing the number of expensive objective function evaluations in a simulation-driven design process. This is obtained by replacing the direct optimization of the expensive model by iterative updating and re-optimization of its cheap surrogate model. Among proven SBO techniques, the methods exploiting physics-based low-fidelity models are probably the most efficient. This is because the knowledge about the system of interest embedded in the low-fidelity model allows constructing the surrogate model that has good generalization capability at a cost of just a few evaluations of the original model. This chapter reviews one of the most recent SBO techniques, the so-called shape-preserving response prediction (SPRP). We discuss the formulation of SPRP, its limitations, and generalizations, and, most importantly, demonstrate its applications to solve design problems in various engineering areas, including microwave engineering, antenna design, and aerodynamic shape optimization. We also discuss the use of SPRP for creating fast surrogate models with illustrations from the microwave engineering area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nocedal, J., Wright, S.: Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Conn, A.R., Scheinberg, K., Vicente, L.N.: Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, MPS-SIAM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. El Sabbagh, M.A., Bakr, M.H., Nikolova, N.K.: Sensitivity analysis of the scattering parameters of microwave filters using the adjoint network method. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 16, 596–606 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koziel, S., Echeverría-Ciaurri, D., Leifsson, L.: Surrogate-based methods. In: Koziel, S., Yang, X.S. (eds.) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms, Series: Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 33–60. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Forrester, A.I.J., Keane, A.J.: Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 45, 50–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P.N., Allen, J.K.: Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng. Comput. 17, 129–150 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Queipo, N.V., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidynathan, R., Tucker, P.K.: Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41, 1–28 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smola, A.J., Schölkopf, B.: A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 14, 199–222 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rayas-Sánchez, J.E.: EM-based optimization of microwave circuits using artificial neural networks: the state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 52, 420–435 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandrov, N.M., Dennis, J.E., Lewis, R.M., Torczon, V.: A trust region framework for managing use of approximation models in optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 15(1), 16–23 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng, Q.S., Bandler, J.W., Koziel, S., Bakr, M.H., Ogurtsov, S.: The state of the art of microwave CAD: EM-based optimization and modeling. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 20, 475–491 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Echeverria, D., Hemker, P.W.: Space mapping and defect correction. CMAM Int. Math. J. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 5(2), 107–136 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rautio, J.C.: Perfectly calibrated internal ports in EM analysis of planar circuits. In: IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., Atlanta, pp. 1373–1376 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L.: Trust Region Methods, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koziel, S.: Shape-preserving response prediction for microwave design optimization. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 58, 2829–2837 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koziel, S., Ogurtsov, S., Szczepanski, S.: Rapid antenna design optimization using shape-preserving response prediction. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Technical Sci. 60, 143–149 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koziel, S., Leifsson, L.: Transonic airfoil shape optimization using variable-resolution models and pressure distribution alignment. In: AIAA Applied Aerodynamic Conference, Honolulu, 27–30 June 2011, AIAA-2011-3177

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bandler, J.W., Cheng, Q.S., Dakroury, S.A., Mohamed, A.S., Bakr, M.H., Madsen, K., Sondergaard, J.: Space mapping: the state of the art. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 52, 337–361 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koziel, S., Bandler, J.W., Cheng, Q.S.: Robust trust-region space-mapping algorithms for microwave design optimization. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 58, 2166–2174 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Booker, A.J., Dennis Jr., J.E., Frank, P.D., Serafini, D.B., Torczon, V., Trosset, M.W.: A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Optim. 17, 1–13 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guan, X., Ma, Z., Cai, P., Anada, T., Hagiwara, G.: A microstrip dual-band bandpass filter with reduced size and improved stopband characteristics. Microw. Opt. Tech. Lett. 50, 618–620 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. em TM Version 12.54, Sonnet Software, Inc., 100 Elwood Davis Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212, USA, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Agilent ADS, Version 2011, Agilent Technologies, 1400 Fountaingrove Parkway, Santa Rosa, CA 95403–1799 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, Z.N.: Wideband microstrip antennas with sandwich substrate. IET Microw. Ant. Prop. 2, 538–546 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CST Microwave Studio, CST AG, Bad Nauheimer Str. 19, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abbott, I.H., Von Doenhoff, A.E.: Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  27. ICEM CFD, ver. 14, ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. FLUENT, ver. 14, ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kuo, J.T., Chen, S.P., Jiang, M.: Parallel-coupled microstrip filters with over-coupled end stages for suppression of spurious responses. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Comput. Lett. 13, 440–442 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. RT/duroid® 5870/5880 High Frequency Laminates, Data Sheet, Rogers Corporation, Publication #92-101 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koziel, S., Leifsson, L.: Generalized shape-preserving response prediction for accurate modeling of microwave structures. IET Microw. Ant. Prop. 6, 1332–1339 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koziel, S.: Shape-preserving response prediction for microwave circuit modeling. In: IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig, Anaheim, pp. 1660–1663 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bandler, J.W., Cheng, Q.S., Koziel, S.: Simplified space mapping approach to enhancement of microwave device models. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 16, 518–535 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Koziel, S., Szczepanski, S.: Accurate modeling of microwave structures using shape-preserving response prediction. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 5, 1116–1122 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salleh, M.K.M., Pringent, G., Pigaglio, O., Crampagne, R.: Quarter-wavelength side-coupled ring resonator for bandpass filters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 56, 156–162 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. FEKO® User’s Manual, Suite 5.4, 2008, EM Software & Systems-S.A. (Pty) Ltd., 32 Techno Lane, Technopark, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koziel, S., Ogurtsov, S., Cheng, Q.S., Bandler, J.W.: Rapid electromagnetic-based microwave design optimisation exploiting shape-preserving response prediction and adjoint sensititivies. IET Microwaves Antennas Prop. 8, 775--781 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slawomir Koziel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koziel, S., Leifsson, L. (2014). Shape-Preserving Response Prediction for Surrogate Modeling and Engineering Design Optimization. In: Koziel, S., Leifsson, L., Yang, XS. (eds) Solving Computationally Expensive Engineering Problems. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 97. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08985-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics