Skip to main content

Access-Centric In-Network Storage Optimization in Distributed Sensing Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Behavior Understanding in Networked Sensing

Abstract

Distributed sensing networks are getting increasingly complex these days. The main reason are the changing demands of the users and application scenarios, which require multipurpose systems. Enabled by continuously improving computational and storage capacities of sensors, this development leads to an increasing number of different algorithms which run concurrently in a sensing network. Thereby, they enable sensor-actuator platforms to perform various kinds of analysis and actions in parallel. Within such a sensor network a variety of algorithms is performed simultaneously. When developing distributed vision and control algorithms, developers focus mainly on the consecutive processing stages. Such a process typically begins with perceiving raw sensor data and terminates with delivering high-level event data to responsible entities. Thereby, different stages may be performed at varying locations within the underlying network. Although the researchers may apply custom optimizations to their data flows, these are highly specific. During design time, it is impossible to anticipate each system environment or predict their algorithms’ possible interactions and synergies with other data flows. We propose a generic storage architecture which separates algorithms from data storage and retrieval. By making use of the fact that most data in sensing networks refers to geographic areas, our architecture takes care of the data flow and its online optimization throughout the network at runtime. By decoupling the processing stages from the data flow, we allow for self-organizing meta-level optimizations of data placement in the network. Moreover, this approach even makes inter-algorithmic optimizations possible, if different algorithms process similar data within their step-wise processing logic. With the introduction of the access-centric storage paradigm, we prove to reduce network load and query latency at the same time at runtime.

\(\copyright \) 2013 IEEE. Reprinted, with permission, from Application-Independent In-Network Storage Optimization for Distributed Smart Camera Systems in Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC), 2013.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdelzaher T, Bhattacharya S, Kim H, Prabh S (2003) Energy-conserving data placement and asynchronous multicast in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of mobisys 2003: the first international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aghajan H, Cavallaro A (eds) (2009) Multi-camera networks-principles and applications. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akyildiz IF, Vuran MC (2010) Wireless sensor networks. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Albano M, Chessa S, Nidito F, Pelagatti S (2007) Q-NiGHT: adding QoS to data centric storage in non-uniform sensor networks. Sensors (Peterborough, NH), pp 166–173

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dabek F, Zhao B, Druschel P, Kubiatowicz J, Stoica I (2003) Towards a common API for structured P2P overlays. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on peer-to-peer systems (IPTPS03), vol 2735, pp 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Angelo D, Grenz C, Kuntzsch C, Bogen M (2012) CamInSens-an intelligent in-situ security system for public spaces. In: International conference on security and management (SAM), Las Vegas, Nevada

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dudkowski D (2009) Fundamental storage mechanisms for location-based services in mobile ad-hoc networks. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grenz C, Hähner J (2011) PhD forum: adaptive storage management in highly heterogeneous smart sensor systems. In: 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on distributed smart cameras, ICDSC 2011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grenz C, Hähner J, Asam F (2013) Application-independent in-network storage optimization for distributed smart camera systems. In: Seventh international conference on distributed smart cameras (ICDSC)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grenz C, Jänen U, Hähner J, Kuntzsch C, Menze M, D’Angelo D, Bogen M, Monari E (2012) CamInSens-demonstration of a distributed smart camera system for in-situ threat detection. In Proceedings of international conference on distributed smart cameras (ICDSC)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann M, Wittke M, Hähner J, Müller-Schloer C (2008) Spatial partitioning in self-organizing smart camera systems. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 2(4):480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaenen U, Feuerhake U, Klinger T, Muhle D, Hähner J, Sester M, Heipke C (2012) Qtrajectories: improving the quality of object tracking using self-organizing camera networks. In: ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol I-4, pp 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaenen U, Spiegelberg H, Sommer L, von Mammen S, Brehm J, Haehner J (2013) Object tracking as job-scheduling problem. In: Seventh international conference on distributed smart cameras (ICDSC) IEEE, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karp B, Kung HT (2000) Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom), Boston, pp 243–254

    Google Scholar 

  15. Köpke A, Swigulski M, Wessel K, Willkomm D, Klein Haneveld PT, Parker TEV, Visser OW, Lichte HS, Valentin S (2008) Simulating wireless and mobile networks in OMNeT++ the MiXiM vision. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on simulation tools and techniques for communications networks and systems (ICST)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar B (2008) ZGHT- a zonal hash-table for data-centric storage. TAMU Comp Sci, College station, TX 77840

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nam Le T, Yu W, Bai X, Xuan D (2006) A dynamic geographic hash table for data-centric storage in sensor networks. In: IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), pp 2168–2174

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monari E, Pollok T (2011) A real-time image-to-panorama registration approach for background subtraction using pan-tilt-cameras. In: International conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance (AVSS), IEEE computer Society, pp 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  19. Monari E, Voth S, Kroschel K (2008) An object-and task-oriented architecture for automated video surveillance in distributed sensor networks. In: IEEE fifth international conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance (AVSS), pp 339–346

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ratnasamy S, Francis P, Handley M, Karp R,Shenker S (2001) A scalable content addressable network. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on applications., technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications (ACM SIGCOMM), vol TR-00-010, University of Berkeley,CA, pp 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ratnasamy S, Karp B, Yin L, Yu F, Estrin D, Govindan R (2002) GHT: a geographic hash table for data-centric storage. In: Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications (WSNA)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rinner B, Wolf W (2008) Proc IEEE 96(10):1565–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shenker S, Ratnasamy S, Karp B, Govindan R, Estrin D (2003) Data-centric storage in sensornets. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 33(1):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoica I, Morris R, Karger D, Frans Kaashoek M, Balakrishnan H (2001) Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, New York, pp 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  25. Varga A, Hornig R (2008) An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Simulation tools and techniques for communications, networks and systems & workshops (Simutools)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wittke M, Grenz C, Hähner J (2011) Towards organic active vision systems for visual surveillance. In: Berekovic M, Fornaciari W, Brinkschulte U, Silvano C (eds) Architecture of computing systems-ARCS 2011. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–206

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Grenz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grenz, C., Tomforde, S., Hähner, J. (2014). Access-Centric In-Network Storage Optimization in Distributed Sensing Networks. In: Spagnolo, P., Mazzeo, P., Distante, C. (eds) Human Behavior Understanding in Networked Sensing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10807-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10807-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10806-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10807-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics