Abstract
The objective of this chapter is to determine whether the current practice within CSR reporting provides relevant information that enables stakeholders to evaluate the CSR commitment of companies. In order to address this issue, we have conducted an empirical investigation examining the CSR reports of some of the world’s largest companies. Based on the data, we argue that CSR reporting does not enable stakeholders to evaluate the CSR commitment of companies. The main problem is that companies do not present or defend sufficiently clear baselines, i.e. stakeholders are mostly kept in the dark when it comes to the level of a company’s social and environmental obligations. In addition, the variety of different values, e.g., marginal groups in the workforce, and reducing CO2 emissions, makes CSR reports very hard to evaluate. The lack of a common CSR currency means that we need guidelines on how to compare the different values.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apple (2013). Creating jobs through innovation. http://www.apple.com/about/job-creation. Accessed 6 May 2013.
Forbes (2012). Global 2000 leading companies. http://www.forbes.com/global2000/list. Accessed 22 March 2013.
Hess, D. (2001). Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at social accounting, auditing, and reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 207–330.
S&P Dow Jones Indices & RobecoSam Sustainability Investing. (2013). Dow Jones sustainability world index guide version 12.1. Zurich: RobecoSAM AG.
CSR Reports
Apple (2013a). Facilities environmental footprint report Fiscal 2012. http://www.apple.com.
Apple (2013b). Supplier responsibility 2013 progress report. http://www.apple.com.
Dell (2013). 2012 corporate responsibility report. http://www.dell.com.
ExxonMobil (2013). 2012 corporate citizenship report. http://www.exxommobil.com.
Hewlett-Packard (2013). 2012 global citizenship report. http://www.hp.com.
Kraft Foods (2012). Our progress in 2011 – creating a more delicious world. http://www.kraftfoods.com.
Nestlé (2013). Creating shared value and meeting our commitments 2012. http://www.nestle.com.
PetroChina (2013). 2012 sustainability report. http://www.petrochina.com.
Royal Dutch Shell (2013). Sustainability report 2012. http://www.shell.com.
Unilever (2013). Progress report 2012 – unilever sustainable living plan. http://www.unilever.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frederiksen, C.S., Nielsen, M.E.J. (2015). CSR Reporting Seen from an Ethical Perspective: An Empirical Investigation. In: Idowu, S., Frederiksen, C., Mermod, A., Nielsen, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10908-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10909-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)