Skip to main content

Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies in South Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pharmaceutical Prices in the 21st Century

Abstract

South Korean healthcare system has experienced an unprecedented growth and transformation in the span 15 years. The landmarks were the unification of insurance funds, and the separation of prescribing and dispensing of drugs (SPD). Several pricing policies have been introduced, revised and abolished to attempt to address unexpected increases in pharmaceutical expenditure which followed the separation of prescribing and dispensing of medicines. This chapter outlines the health care and pharmaceutical systems in South Korea, details pricing policies in the latest decade and reviews the effectiveness of these policies. While having a long-lasting history in pharmaceutical price control, South Korea has often introduced policies with a weak scientific basis and then abolished them without proper assessment and evaluation. Some evidence suggests that price controls have reduced pharmaceutical costs in the short-term, but evidence on the long-term impacts are largely absent. Given the cause of current cost inflation, i.e., increased use of pharmaceuticals and an ageing population, society needs a policy consensus to control prices and encourage rational prescribing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Values adjusted by purchasing power parity (PPP) to eliminate price level differences in inter-country comparisons, equalising currencies by using a basket of goods and services.

  2. 2.

    US$1 = 1,100 KRW in 2014.

  3. 3.

    France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, the UK and the US.

  4. 4.

    The first to fifth generic drug is set at less than 80 % of cost for its off-patent alternative. The sixth and later product is set at the 90 % price of the least expensive alternative (MOHW Official Instructions 200514; provision 8).

  5. 5.

    For instance, ‘GenericA’, a generic product of the ‘OriginalA’ (price 100) was priced at the maximum of 80 (i.e. 0.8 × 100) in the previous system. Now, it is priced at maximum 64 (i.e. 0.8 × 0.8 × 100) because the price of ‘OriginalA’ is reduced to 80 in the new system.

References

  • Andersson K, Bergstrom G, Petzold MG, Carlsten A (2007) Impact of a generic substitution reform on patients’ and society’s expenditure for pharmaceuticals. Health Policy 81(2–3):376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae E-Y, Kim J-H (2001) Pharmaceutical price regulation in Korea. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho J-G, Lee E-K, Kim J-Y, Jang S-M, Bae E-Y, Park H-K, Lee S-J, Kim J-K, Lee Y-H (2001) Evaluation and policy implication of the separation of prescribing and dispensing drugs. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho J-G, Choi S-H, Lee S-Y, Yoon K-J (2003) Achievements and policy implication of the separation of prescribing and dispensing drugs. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ (2007) Analysis of factors attributing to pharmaceutical expenditure. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S-E (2008) Current state and challenges of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 41(2):74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S-J, Kim J-H, Lee S-Y (2005) Intensify public share in the National Health Insurance: definition, plan and practice. Health Insur Forum 4(4):2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung WJ (2002) The political economy of health policy decision-making: Korea’s drug pricing policy reform. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 11(4):99–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung WJ, Kim HJ (2005) Interest groups’ influence over drug pricing policy reform in South Korea. Yonsei Med J 46(3):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (1999a) Doctors prefer original drugs in case of the introduction of the separation policy. DailyPharm, 8 June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (1999b) Putting the actual acquisition price system into effect in October; 30% price cut. DailyPharm, 1 Sept 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (2000) Abolishment of a fund requirement in drug wholesalers. DailyPharm, 12 March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (2004a) Public health organisations, call for abolishing “A7 average pricing”. DailyPharm, 11 Feb 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (2004b) Urgent needs to provide the information of healthcare utilization. DailyPharm, 12 April 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (2006) NCEs, spending 132 days for benefit listing. DailyPharm, 11 Feb 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • DailyPharm (2007) Four NCEs out of ten registered on the positive list. DailyPharm, 12 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha D, Choi Y, Kim DU, Chung KH, Lee EK (2011) A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea. Clin Ther 33(7):926–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HIRA (2012) Statistics for drug products distribution 2011. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Korea Pharmaceutical Information Service, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • HIRA (2013) About the drug-related group payment. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA030066010000. Accessed 10 May 2014

  • Huh S-I, Jung J-C, Lee H-Y (2006) A strategy for rationalising pharmaceutical expenditure. National Health Insurance Corporation, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang G-J (2006) National health insurance: from segmentation to greater equality. In: Pathways to state welfare in Korea: interests, ideas and institutions. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 80–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang S-M, Lee E-K, Kim Y, Han E-A, Bae E-Y, Kim J-Y, Lee Y-H, Shin C-W, Song Y-M, Kang Y-H, Hwang K-H (2001) Pharmaceutical utilisation before and after the separation of prescribing and dispensing of drugs; focusing on changes in prescribing behaviour. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang S, Park CM, Bae G, Lee HJ, Kim HS (2010) Analysis of factors affecting the change of pharmaceutical expenditure. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong H-S, Lee EK, Kim EJ, Ryu G-C, Song YM, Kim SJ (2005) Impact of the purchasing price reimbursement system for insurance drugs upon the health insurer’s financial situation. Korean J Health Policy Adm 15(3):40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S-W, Lee T-J, Cho B-H (2008) Market competition structure after original drug patent expiry. Korean J Health Econ Policy 14(2):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • KHIDI (2004) Health industry year book 2003. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • KHIDI (2007) Health industry year book 2006. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • KHIDI (2013) Health industry year book 2013. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Osong

    Google Scholar 

  • KIDS (2013) About KIDS. Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management. https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/iwt/ds/en/introduction/EgovGreeting.do. Accessed 10 May 2014

  • Kim J-H (2002) History of Korean pharmaceutical pricing and challenges. Monthly Consumers. http://www.consumer.or.kr/magazine/mz_view.html?num=41

  • Kim S-O (2005) Realities in expensive drug prescribing and its determinants. Health Insur Forum 4(4):57–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-O, Choi S-E (2011) Improving price-volume arrangement system by linking expenditure target with pharmaceutical price negotiation. Korean J Health Econ Policy 17(3):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-H, Jung J-C (2005) Survey of out-of-pocket in the National Health Insurance system. Health Insur Forum 4(1):74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-H, Lee H-Y (2006) Survey of out-of-pocket in the National Health Insurance system 2005. Health Insur Forum 5(4):42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim W, Lee K (2008) Drug price policy under national health insurance: a win-win strategy. Korean Soc Secur Stud 24(4):65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-J, Kwon S-M, Jung Y, Heo J-H (2010) International comparison of generic medicine prices. Korean J Health Econ Policy 16(3):41–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Pharmacists for Democratic Society (2006) Introduce a proper positive list system to remove drug price premium. Korean Pharmacists for Democratic Society, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Statistical Information Services (2014) Health expenditure. National Statistical Office. http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_03List.jsp?vwcd=MT_RTITLE&parmTabId=M_03_01#SubCont. Accessed 30 June 2014

  • Kwon S (2003) Pharmaceutical reform and physician strikes in Korea: separation of drug prescribing and dispensing. Soc Sci Med 57(3):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon S, Reich MR (2005) The changing process and politics of health policy in Korea. J Health Polit Policy Law 30(6):1003–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon H-Y, Yang B-M (2011) Fixed budget for pharmaceuticals. Korean J Health Econ Policy 17(1):25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon H-Y, Hong J-M, Godman B, Yang B-M (2013) Price cuts and drug spending in South Korea: the case of antihyperlipidemic agents. Health Policy 112(3):217–226. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-Y (2005) Reforms of the health care delivery system in transition. Health Insur Forum 4(2):16–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee E-K (2006) Reimbursement pricing and some policy implications. Health Insur Forum 5(2):2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-H (2010) Evaluating pharmaceutical policy in South Korea. University of York, York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-H (2013a) Evidence-based pharmaceutical policy-making; a challenging task? Vivid voices from Korean experts. Korean J Clin Pharm 23(3):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH (2013b) The review of market-based Actual Transaction Price system. SungKyunKwan University, Suwon

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H-J, Lee T-J (2013) Impact of price control on drug expenditure and factors associated with the drug switch among statins: analysis of HIRA-NPS data. Health Policy Manage 23(2):112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EK, Malone DC (2003) Comparison of peptic-ulcer drug use and expenditures before and after the implementation of a government policy to separate prescribing and dispensing practices in South Korea. Clin Ther 25(2):578–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-H, Bloor K, Hewitt C, Maynard A (2012) The effects of new pricing and copayment schemes for pharmaceuticals in South Korea. Health Policy 104(1):40–49. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Park JH, Shin HH, Ko SK (2013) Reference pricing; case study and implication. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 29(4):201–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-H, Park S, Lee EK (2014) Generic utilization in the Korean National Health Insurance market; cost, volume and influencing factors. Yakhak Hoeji 58(2):99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • MOHW (2006) [MOHW report to the National Assembly 2006]. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Gwacheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsmp (2012) M.P. NamYoon insists the abolishment of market-based Actual Transaction Price system. Newsmp, 8 Oct 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • NHIC, HIRA (2007) Statistical booklet on 30 year-history of Korean National Health Insurance. National Health Insurance Corporation, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • NHIS, HIRA (2012) National Health Insurance statistical yearbook. National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) How does Korea compare OECD Health Data 2007. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013a) Health expenditure OECD Factbook 2013: economic, environmental and social statistics. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013b) Life expectancy at birth, total population. Health: key tables from OECD, no. 11. doi:10.1787/lifexpy-total-table-2013-2-en

  • OECD (2013c) Pharmaceutical expenditure. Health: key tables from OECD. doi:10.1787/pharmexpcap-table-2013-2-en; 10.1787/pharmexp-table-2013-2-en

  • OECD.Stat (2014) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/statistics. Accessed 12 June 2014

  • Park S (2010) Risk-sharing agreement on the pricing and reimbursement of new drugs. Korean J Health Econ Policy 16(2):125–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Jang Y-S, Chae S-M, Park E-J, Kim N-S, Lee EK, Lee I-H (2011) An indepth study of the utilization and costs of pharmaceuticals in South Korea, 2010. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Jang Y-S, Park E-J, Chae S-M, Lee Y-S, Ko S-K, Lee EK, Lee I-H (2012) An indepth study of the utilization and costs of pharmaceuticals in South Korea, 2012. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (1998) Overestimated drug prices causes more than a trillion won financial loss in the National Health Insurance. Committee on Social Welfare, People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (1999) MOHW should disclosure real transaction prices for pharmaceuticals. Committee on Social Welfare, People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin J-Y, Choi S-E (2008) The volume and the price of generic drug consumption in Korean prescription drug market. Korean J Health Econ Policy 14(1):103–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoens S, De Coster S (2006) Sustaining generic medicines markets in Europe. Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-Y (2002) A critical analysis of drug pricing and reimburse schemes in Korean medical insurance system. Kukje Kyungje Yongu 8(3):249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonhapnews (2011) Number of public beds, staying the same for 10 years. Yonhapnews, 18 Oct 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon H-S (2008) National Insurance reimbursement pricing scheme: challenges and a strategy for improvement. Korea Development Institute, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iyn-Hyang Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, IH., Bloor, K. (2015). Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies in South Korea. In: Babar, ZUD. (eds) Pharmaceutical Prices in the 21st Century. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12169-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics