Skip to main content

Abstract

In relation extraction, distant supervision is proposed to automatically generate a large amount of labeled data. Distant supervision heuristically aligns the given knowledge base to free text and consider the alignment as labeled data. This procedure is effective to get training data. However, this heuristically label procedure is confronted with wrong labels. Thus, the extracted features are noisy and cause poor extraction performance. In this paper, we exploit the sparse representation to address the noise feature problem. Given a new test feature vector, we first compute its sparse linear combination of all the training features. To reduce the influence of noise features, a noise term is adopted in the procedure of finding the sparse solution. Then, the residuals to each class are computed. Finally, we classify the test sample by assigning it to the object class that has minimal residual. Experimental results demonstrate that the noise term is effective to noise features and our approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bunescu, R., Mooney, R.: Subsequence kernels for relation extraction. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, p. 171 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bunescu, R.C., Mooney, R.J.: A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 724–731 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, J., Ji, D., Tan, C.L., Niu, Z.: Unsupervised feature selection for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of IJCNLP (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S.S., Donoho, D.L., Saunders, M.A.: Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 129–159 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Donoho, D.L.: For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal ℓ1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Comm. Pure and Applied Math. 59, 797–829 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, Z.: Distributional structure. Word 10(23), 146–162 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hasegawa, T., Sekine, S., Grishman, R.: Discovering relations among named entities from large corpora. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Ling, X., Zettlemoyer, L., Weld, D.S.: Knowledge-based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 541–550 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, K., Aviyente, S.: Sparse representation for signal classification. In: Schölkopf, B., Platt, J., Hoffman, T. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pp. 609–616 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jafari, M.G., Plumbley, M.D.: Fast dictionary learning for sparse representations of speech signals. J. Sel. Topics Signal Processing 5(5), 1025–1031 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kambhatla, N.: Combining lexical, syntactic, and semantic features with maximum entropy models for extracting relations. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, vol. 2, pp. 1003–1011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Qian, L., Zhou, G., Kong, F., Zhu, Q., Qian, P.: Exploiting constituent dependencies for tree kernel-based semantic relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 697–704 (August 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A.: Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6323, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Suchanek, F.M., Ifrim, G., Weikum, G.: Combining linguistic and statistical analysis to extract relations from web documents. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 712–717 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Surdeanu, M., Tibshirani, J., Nallapati, R., Manning, C.D.: Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 455–465 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takamatsu, S., Sato, I., Nakagawa, H.: Reducing wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, vol. 1, pp. 721–729 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, J., Yang, A., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S., Ma, Y.: Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(2), 210–227 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright, J., Ma, Y., Mairal, J., Sapiro, G., Huang, T.S., Yan, S.: Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 98(6), 1031–1044 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zelenko, D., Aone, C., Richardella, A.: Kernel methods for relation extraction. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 1083–1106 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Zeng, J., Yan, J., Chen, Z., Sui, Z.: Towards accurate distant supervision for relational facts extraction. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 810–815 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, G., Jian, S., Jie, Z., Min, Z.: Exploring various knowledge in relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 427–434 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zeng, D., Lai, S., Wang, X., Liu, K., Zhao, J., Lv, X. (2014). Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction via Sparse Representation. In: Sun, M., Liu, Y., Zhao, J. (eds) Chinese Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing Based on Naturally Annotated Big Data. NLP-NABD CCL 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8801. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12277-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12277-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12277-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics