Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Urinary Catheters, Drains and Stomas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prosthetic Surgery in Urology

  • 776 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the different types of catheter available for bladder drainage, with details of their composition, size and style. We include technical tips on the insertion and the recognition and management of catheter complications, with an emphasis on catheter associated urinary tract infections and antibiotic stewardship. A description of the different types and indications for surgical drains is also provided, and a comprehensive overview of the types of stoma used in urological practice, including continent catheterisable channels (Mitrofanoff and Yang-Monti), ileal conduit, double-barrelled wet colostomy, vesicostomy and ureterostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foley FE. A self-retaining bag catheter for use as an indwelling catheter for constant drainage of the bladder. J Urol. 1937;38:140–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mercier LA. Memoire sue les sondes elastiques et particulierement sue les sondes coudees et bicoudees. Gaz Med Paris 3rd Ser. 1863;18:365–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson Walker JW. Hunterian lecture on the bladder in gunshot and other injuries of the spinal cord. Lancet. 1917;189:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Riches EW. The methods and results of treatment in cases of paralysis of the bladder following spinal injury. Br J Surg. 1943;31:135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guttmann L, Frankel H. The value of intermittent catheterization in the early management of traumatic paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1966;4:63–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972;107:458–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000;163:768–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandes S. Initial management of anterior and posterior urethral injuries. Urol Clin North Am. 2006;33:87–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martínez-Piñeiro L, Djakovic N, Plas E, Mor Y, Santucci RA, Serafetinidis E, et al. EAU guidelines on urethral trauma. Eur Urol. 2010;57:791–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C, Kooiman G, Montgomery BS, Plail RO. The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:210–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacob P, Rai BP, Todd AW. Suprapubic catheter insertion using an ultrasound-guided technique and literature review. BJU Int. 2012;110:779–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguilera PA, Choi T, Durham BA. Ultrasound-guided suprapubic cystotomy catheter placement in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2004;26:319–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feneley RCL, Kunin CM, Stickler DJ. An indwelling urinary catheter for the 21st century. BJU Int. 2012;109:1746–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stickler DJ, Young R, Jones G, Sabbuba NA, Morris NS. Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm? Urol Res. 2003;31:306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts JA, Fussell EN, Kaack MB. Bacterial adherence to urethral catheters. J Urol. 1990;144(2 Pt 1):264–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunin CK, Chin QF, Chambers S. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in ‘blockers’ and ‘non-blockers’. J Urol. 1987;138:899–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crnich CJ, Drinka PJ. Does the composition of urinary catheters influence clinical outcomes and the results of research studies? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:102–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence EL, Turner IG. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: conventional Foley catheters. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:147–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Ridder DJ, Everaert K, Fernández LG, Valero JV, Durán AB, Abrisqueta ML, et al. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial. Eur Urol. 2005;48:991–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lederer JW, Jarvis WR, Thomas L, Ritter J. Multicenter cohort study to assess the impact of a silver-alloy and hydrogel- coated urinary catheter on symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infections. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014;41:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schumm K, Lam TB. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD004013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G. Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD004997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, Starr K, Kilonzo M, McPherson G, et al. Antimicrobial catheters for the reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterization in hospital: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1927–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaonkar TA, Caraos L, Modak S. Efficacy of a silicone urinary catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and triclosan against colonization with Proteus mirabilis and other uropathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:596–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones GLI, Russell AD, Caliskan Z, Stickler DJ. A strategy for the control of catheter blockage by crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm using the antibacterial agent triclosan. Eur Urol. 2005;48:838–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dance DA, Pearson AD, Seal DV, Lowes JA. A hospital outbreak caused by a chlorhexidine and antibiotic-resistant Proteus mirabilis. J Hosp Infect. 1987;10:10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parkes AW, Harper N, Herwadkar A, Pumphrey R. Anaphylaxis to the chlorhexidine component of Instillagel: a case series. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:65–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrison SC, Lawrence WT, Morley R, Pearce I, Taylor J. British Association of Urological Surgeons suprapubic catheter practice guidelines. BJU Int. 2011;107:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammed A, Khan A, Shergill IS, Gujral SS. A new model for suprapubic catheterisation: the Mediplus Seldinger suprapubic catheter. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:705–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ, da Silva EMK, Silva LA. Urinary catheter policies for long-term bladder drainage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD004201.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hunter KF, Bharmal A, Moore KN. Long-term bladder drainage: suprapubic catheter versus other methods: a scoping review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:944–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin C-H, Huang H-T, Chien C-C, Tzeng D-S, Lung F-W. Purple urine bag syndrome in nursing homes: ten elderly case reports and a literature review. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:729–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Parkin J, Scanlan J, Wooley M, Grover D, Evans A, Feneley RCL. Urinary catheter ‘deflation cuff’ formation: clinical audit and quantitative in vitro analysis. BJU Int. 2002;90:666–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stickler DJ. Clinical complications of urinary catheters caused by crystalline biofilms: something needs to be done. J Intern Med. 2014;276:120–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suller MT, Anthony VJ, Mathur S, Feneley RC, Greenman J, Stickler DJ. Factors modulating the pH at which calcium and magnesium phosphates precipitate from human urine. Urol Res. 2005;33:254–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stickler DJ, Morgan SD. Modulation of crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm development on urinary catheters. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan A, Housami F, Melotti R, Timoney A, Stickler D. Strategy to control catheter encrustation with citrated drinks: a randomised crossover study. J Urol. 2010;183:1390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kohler-Ockmore J, Feneley RC. Long-term catheterisation of the bladder: prevalence and morbidity. Br J Urol. 1996;77:347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hagen S, Sinclair L, Cross S. Washout policies in long-term indwelling urinary catheterisation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(3):CD004012.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ruden H, Gastmeier P, Daschner FD, Schumacher M. Nosocomial and community-acquired infections in Germany. Summary of the results of the First National Prevalence Study (NIDEP). Infection. 1997;25:199–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tenke P, Kovacs B, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Matsumoto T, Tambyaj PA, Naber KG. European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31 Suppl 1:S58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:342–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tambyah P, Olyszyna DP, Tenke P, Koves P. Urinary catheters and drainage systems: definition, epidemiology and risk factors. In: Naber KG, Schaeffer AJ, Heyns C, Matsumoto T, et al., editors. Urogenital infections. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2010. p. 523–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jarvis RJ, Martone WJ. Predominant pathogens in hospital infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29 Suppl A:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stamm WE. Urinary tract infection. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS, editors. Hospital infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 477–88.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tambyah PA, Halvorson KT, Maki DG. A prospective study of pathogenesis of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Krein SL, Hickner A, Kuhn L, Cheng A, et al. Determining the noninfectious complications of indwelling urethral catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:401–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J, Moeschberger M. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. J Epidemiol. 1992;135:291–301.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, et al. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:625–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:e8639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Meddings J, Rogers MAM, Macy M, Saint S. Systematic review and meta-analysis: reminder systems to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urinary catheter use in hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lusardi G, Lipp A, Shaw C. Antibiotic prophylaxis for short-term catheter bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD005428.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marschall J, Carpenter CR, Fowler S, Trautner BW. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections after removal of urinary catheter: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f3147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Waites KB, Canupp KC, Roper JF, Camp SM, Chen Y. Evaluation of 3 methods of bladder irrigation to treat bacteriuria in persons with neurogenic bladder. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. El Masri y WS, Patil S, Prasanna KV, Chowdhury JR. To cystoscope or not to cystoscope patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries managed with indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheters? That is the question! Spinal Cord. 2014;52:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. El-Masri WS, Fellows G. Bladder cancer after spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1981;19:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kalisvaart JF, Katsumi HK, Ronningen LD, Hovey RM. Bladder cancer in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:257–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bejany DE, Lockhart JL, Rhamy RK. Malignant vesical tumors following spinal cord injury. J Urol. 1987;138:1390–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Groah SL, Weitzenkamp DA, Lammertse DP, Whiteneck GG, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF. Excess risk of bladder cancer in spinal cord injury: evidence for an association between indwelling catheter use and bladder cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee WY, Sun LM, Lin CL, Liang JA, Chang YJ, Sung FC, Kao CH. Risk of prostate and bladder cancers in patients with spinal cord injury: a population-based cohort study. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:51.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. James R, Frasure HE, Mahajan ST. Urinary catheterization may not adversely impact quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients. ISRN Neurol. 2014;2014:167030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Kosins AM, Scholz T, Cetinkaya M, Evans GR. Evidence-based value of subcutaneous surgical wound drainage: the largest systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:443–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD002100.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Barie PS. Are we draining the life from our patients? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002;3:159–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part II. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:635–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Moro ML, Carrieri MP, Tozzi AE, Lana S, Greco D. Risk factors for surgical wound infections in clean surgery: a multicenter study. Italian PRINOS Study Group. Ann Ital Chir. 1996;67:13–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Drinkwater CJ, Neil MJ. Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Swartz MA, Morgan TM, Krieger JN. Complications of scrotal surgery for benign conditions. Urology. 2007;69:616–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sagar PM, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, MacFie J. Randomised trial of drainage of colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1993;80:769–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg. 2004;240:1074–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Carter P. Perforation of the bowel by suction drains. Br J Surg. 1993;80:129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Deng S, Dong Q, Wang J, Zhang P. The role of mechanical bowel preparation before ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;92:339–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Leong CH. Use of the stomach for bladder replacement and urinary diversion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1978;60:283–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Golimbu M, Morales P. Jejunal conduits: technique and complications. J Urol. 1975;113:787–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Libertino JA, Zinman L. Ileocecal conduit for temporary and permanent urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am. 1986;13:241–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schmidt JD, Buchsbaum HJ, Nacheim DA. Long term followup, further experience with, and modification of the transverse colon conduit in urinary tract diversion. Br J Urol. 1985;57:284–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Richie JP. Sigmoid conduit urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am. 1986;13:225–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bricker EM. Bladder substitute after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am. 1950;30:1511–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gore JL, Yu HY, Setodji C, Hanley JM, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urinary diversion and morbidity after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2010;116:331–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Schmid M, Rink M, Traumann M, Bastian PJ, Bartsch G, Ellinger J, et al. Evidence from the PROspective MulticEnTer RadIcal Cystectomy Series 2011 (PROMETRICS 2011) study: how are preoperative patient characteristics associated with urinary diversion type after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):1032–42.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Osborn DJ, Dmochowski RR, Kaufman MR, Milam DF, Mock S, Reynolds WS. Cystectomy with urinary diversion for benign disease: indications and outcomes. Urology. 2014;83:1433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, Farmer SA, Blute ML, Frank I. Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol. 2011;185:562–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Madersbacher S, Schidt J, Eberle JM, Thoeny HC, Burkhard F, Hochreiter W, et al. Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol. 2003;169:985–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Shaaban AA, Abdel-Latif M, Mosbah A, Gad H, Eraky I, Ali-El-Dein B, et al. A randomized study comparing an antireflux system with a direct ureteric anastomosis in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders. BJU Int. 2006;97:1057–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Liu NW, Hackney JT, Gellhaus PT, Monn MF, Masterson TA, Bihrle R, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. J Urol. 2014;191:1313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Martins LT, Serrano JLC. Introducing a peristomal skin assessment tool. The Ostomy Skin Tool. World Counc Therapists J. 2008;28 Supp l:S8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ali AS, Hayes MC, Birch B, Dudderidge T, Somani BK. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) after cystectomy: comparison between orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit diversion. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(3):295–9

    Google Scholar 

  89. Large MC, Malik R, Cohn JA, Richards KA, Ganshert C, Kunnavakkum R. Prospective health-related quality of life analysis for patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology. 2014;84:808–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Brunschwig A, Daniel W. Pelvic exenteration operations: with summary of sixty-six cases surviving more than five years. Ann Surg. 1960;151:571–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE. Simultaneous diversion of the urinary and fecal streams utilizing a single abdominal stoma: the double-barreled wet colostomy. J Urol. 1989;141:1189–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Golda T, Biondo S, Kreisler E, Frago R, Fraccalvieri D, Millan M. Follow-up of double-barreled wet colostomy after pelvic exenteration at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:822–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continent trans-appendiuclaire dans le traitment des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr. 1980;21:297–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Paquin AJ. Ureterovesical anastomosis. The description and evaluation of a technique. J Urol. 1959;82:573–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Woodhouse CR. Continent urinary diversion. In: Frank JD, Gearhart JP, Snyder H, editors. Operative pediatric urology. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  96. England RJ, Subramaniam R. Functional and cosmetic outcome of the VQ plasty for Mitrofanoff stomas. J Urol. 2007;178:2607–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Murthi GV, Kelly JH. V-V plasty: a new technique for providing a resilient skin-lined opening for the Mitrofanoff stoma. Urology. 2006;68:661–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. McAndrew HF, Malone PS. Continent catheterizable conduits: which stoma, which conduit and which reservoir? BJU Int. 2002;89:86–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Cipele H, Hardak B, Duvdevani M, Pode D, et al. Superiority of the VQZ over the tubularized skin flap and the umbilicus for continent abdominal stoma in children. J Urol. 2008;180 Suppl 4:1761–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Lopez PJ, Ashrafian H, Clarke SA, Johnson H, Kiely EM. Early experience with the antegrade colonic enema stopper to reduce stomal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:522–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Duckett JW, Lotfi AH. Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction. J Urol. 1993;149:567–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Liard A, Seguier-Lipszyc E, Mathiot A, Mitrofanoff P. The Mitrofanoff procedure: 20 years later. J Urol. 2001;165:2394–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Harris CF, Cooper CS, Hutcheson JC, Synder III HM. Appendicovesicostomy: the mitrofanoff procedure-a 15-year perspective. J Urol. 2000;163:1922–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Süzer O, Vates TS, Freedman AL, Smith CA, Gonzalez R. Results of the Mitrofanoff procedure in urinary tract reconstruction in children. Br J Urol. 1997;79:279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Yang WH. Yang needle tunnelling technique in creating anti-reflux and continent mechanisms. J Urol. 1993;150:830–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutra MA, de Carvalho JR. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology. 1997;49:112–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Casale AJ. A long continent ileovesicostomy using a single piece of bowel. J Urol. 1999;162:1743–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Castellan MA, Gosalbez R, Labbie A, Ibrahim E, DiSandro M. Outcomes of continent catheterizable stomas for urinary and fecal incontinence: comparison among different tissue options. BJU Int. 2005;95:1053–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Cain MP, Rink RC, Yerkes EB, Kaefer M, Casale AJ. Long-term followup and outcome of continent catheterizable vesicocstomy using the Rink modification. J Urol. 2002;168:2583–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Bradshaw CJ, Gray R, Downer A, Hitchcock R. Button vesicostomy: 13 years of experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:80–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Kitchens DM, DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reddy P, Polsky E, McGregor A, et al. End cutaneous ureterostomy for the management of severe hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2007;177:1501–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. MacGregor PS, Kay R, Straffon RA. Cutaneous ureterostomy in children-long-term followup. J Urol. 1985;134:518–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Kogan BA, Gohary MA. Cutaneous ureterostomy as a permanent external urinary diversion in children. J Urol. 1984;132:729–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Deliveliotis C, Paptsoris A, Chrisofos M, Dellis A, Liakouras C, Skolarikos A. Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit? Urology. 2005;66:299–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    Suzanne M. Biers MD, FRCS Urol & Nikesh Thiruchelvam MD, FRCS Urol, FEBU

Authors
  1. Suzanne M. Biers MD, FRCS Urol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikesh Thiruchelvam MD, FRCS Urol, FEBU
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikesh Thiruchelvam MD, FRCS Urol, FEBU .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Univeristy College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

    Asif Muneer

  2. Department of Urology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Ian Pearce

  3. Institute of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom

    David Ralph

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biers, S.M., Thiruchelvam, N. (2016). Urinary Catheters, Drains and Stomas. In: Muneer, A., Pearce, I., Ralph, D. (eds) Prosthetic Surgery in Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13859-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13859-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13858-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13859-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation