Abstract
For several years, telemedicine practitioners have struggled to establish their field as an autonomous scientific discipline, which is often reflected in diverging definitions of what telemedicine is. However, the telemedicine community depends on and draws heavily on established scientific areas such as medicine, economics, informatics and social science, which each have their own criteria for good scientific work. In addition, new technological innovations appear to pave the way for new applications within the field, thus challenging perceptions of what the field encompasses. The aim of this paper is to contribute to this debate by conceptualizing the notion of telemedicine as being something people do rather than numerous definitions of what the field is.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gammon, D., Johannessen, L.K., Sørensen, T., Whitten, P.: An overview and analysis of theories employed in telemedicine studies: A field in search of an identity. Methods of Information in Medicine 47(3), 260–269 (2008)
Craig, J., Pattersen, V.: Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11, 3–9 (2005)
Lehoux, P., Sicotte, C., Denis, J.-L., Berg, M., Lacroix, A.: The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians’ clinical routines? Social Science & Medicine 54, 889–904 (2002)
Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(4), 387–420 (1989)
Law, J., Singleton, V.: Object Lessons. Organization 12(3), 331–355 (2005)
de Laet, M., Mol, A.: The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science 30(2), 225–263 (2000)
Bechky, B.: Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology 109(3), 720–752 (2003)
Coiera, E.: Four rules for the reinvention of health care. British Medical Journal 328, 1197–1199 (2004)
Obstfelder, A., Engeseth, K.H., Wynn, R.: Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications. Implementation Science 2(25), 1–11 (2007)
Stanberry, B.: Telemedicine: Barriers and opportunities in the 21st century. Journal of Internal Medicine 247, 615–628 (2000)
Wyatt, J.C., Liu, J.L.Y.: Basic concepts in medical informatics. The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 56, 808–812 (2002)
Sood, S., Mbarika, V., Jugoo, S., Dookhy, R., Doarn, C.R., Prakash, N., Merrell, R.C.: What Is Telemedicine? A Collection of 104 Peer-Reviewed Perspectives and Theoretical Underpinnings. Telemedicine and e-Health 13(5), 573–590 (2007)
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W., Yates, J.: Boundary relations: technological objects and the restructuring of workplace boundaries. Working paper series 16/2007. Judge Business School, Cambridge (2007)
Law, J.: After method: mess in social science research. Routledge, London (2004)
Nicolini, D.: The work to make telemedicine work: A social and articulative view. Social Science & Medicine 62, 2754–2767 (2006)
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4, 74–81 (1995)
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94 (1999)
SHD: Statlig tiltaksplan 2001-2003 Elektronisk samhandling i helse- og sosialsektoren. “Si @!” (Governmental action programme 2001-2003. Electronic interaction in the health and social sector) “say @” (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ellingsen, G. (2015). On the Boundaries of Telemedicine. In: Rocha, A., Correia, A., Costanzo, S., Reis, L. (eds) New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_110
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_110
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16485-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16486-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)