Skip to main content

Derivative-Free Optimization: Lifting Single-Objective to Multi-Objective Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming (CPAIOR 2015)

Abstract

Most of the derivative-free optimization (DFO) algorithms rely on a comparison function able to compare any pair of points with respect to a black-box objective function. Recently, new dedicated derivative-free optimization algorithms have emerged to tackle multi-objective optimization problems and provide a Pareto front approximation to the user. This work aims at reusing single objective DFO algorithms (such as Nelder-Mead) in the context of multi-objective optimization. Therefore we introduce a comparison function able to compare a pair of points in the context of a set of non-dominated points. We describe an algorithm, MOGEN, which initializes a Pareto front approximation composed of a population of instances of single-objective DFO algorithms. These algorithms use the same introduced comparison function relying on a shared Pareto front approximation. The different instances of single-objective DFO algorithms are collaborating and competing to improve the Pareto front approximation. Our experiments comparing MOGEN with the state-of the-art Direct Multi-Search algorithm on a large set of benchmarks shows the practicality of the approach, allowing to obtain high quality Pareto fronts using a reasonably small amount of function evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, S., Pal, S., Aruna, B.: Multiobjective gas, quantitative indices, and pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 34(5), 2088–2099 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben Abdelaziz, F., Lang, P., Nadeau, R.: Dominance and efficiency in multicriteria decision under uncertainty. Theory and Decision 47, 191–211 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Conn, A., Scheinberg, K., Vicente, L.: Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mps-siam Series on Optimization (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Custódio, A., Emmerich, M., Madeira, J.: Recent Developments in Derivative-Free Multiobjective Optimization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Custódio, A.L., Madeira, J.F.A., Vaz, A.I.F., Vicente, L.N.: Direct multisearch for multiobjective optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 21(3), 1109–1140 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis Jr, J.E., Torczon, V.: Direct search methods on parallel machines. SIAM Journal on Optimization 1, 448–474 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Mathematical programming 91(2), 201–213 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Echagüe, E., Delbos, F., Dumas, L.: A global derivative-free optimization method for expensive functions with bound constraints. In: Proceedings of Global Optimization Workshop, pp. 65–68 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fourer, R., Gay, D.M., Kernighan, B.W.: A modeling language for mathematical programming. Management Sci. 36, 519–554 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollat, J., Reed, P., Kasprzyk, J.: A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical bayesian optimization algorithm for large multiobjective monitoring network design problems. Advances in Water Resources 31(5), 828–845 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mor, J., Wild, S.: Benchmarking derivative-free optimization algorithms. SIAM Journal on Optimization 20(1), 172–191 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. In Comput. J. 7 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Voorneveld, M.: Characterization of pareto dominance. Operations Research Letters 31(1), 7–11 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E., Brockhoff, D., Thiele, L.: The hypervolume indicator revisited: On the design of pareto-compliant indicators via weighted integration. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 862–876. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zitzler, E., Knowles, J., Thiele, L.: Quality assessment of pareto set approximations. In: Branke, J., Deb, K., Miettinen, K., Słowiński, R. (eds.) Multiobjective Optimization. LNCS, vol. 5252, pp. 373–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C., da Fonseca, V.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrille Dejemeppe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dejemeppe, C., Schaus, P., Deville, Y. (2015). Derivative-Free Optimization: Lifting Single-Objective to Multi-Objective Algorithm. In: Michel, L. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9075. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18008-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18008-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18007-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18008-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics