Skip to main content

(Online)-Buying Behavior and Personality Traits: Evolutionary Psychology and Neuroscience Based

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 10))

  • 1497 Accesses

Abstract

This paper tries to link findings from evolutionary psychology and neuroscience with the aim to adapt traditional buying models and, as a result, shed new light on the different buying behavior. Out of these theories one can derive that (online) buying behavior is in a general sense twofold. Need-oriented-buying behavior: We purchase goods because we have a need. Yet, this purchase contributes little to our happiness since it is a sheer necessity. Want-oriented buying behavior: Many goods, however, are bought because we “want” and “like” them based on our experience or due to the fact that they are new. Such products generally generate a so-called “incentive salience”. By adding the additional dimension of an involvement component, a two-dimensional model with four archetypical types can be established: (a) Extensive buying, (b) effort-minimizing buying, (c) self-indulgent buying, and (d) conspicuous buying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Katona, G.: Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howard, J.A., Sheth, J.N.: The Theory of Buyer Behavior. Wiley, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weinberg, P.: Emotionale Aspekte des Entscheidungsverhaltens. Ein Vergleich von Erklärungskonzepten. Konsumentenforschung, pp. 171–181 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kroeber-Riel, W.: Konsumentenverhalten. Vahlen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darwin Charles, R.: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Murray, London (1859)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saad, G.: Evolutionary consumption. J. Consum. Psychol. 23, 351–371 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buller, D.J.: Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marks, I.M., Nesse, R.M.: Fear and fitness: an evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15, 247–261 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesse, R.M.: Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Hum. Nat. 1, 261–289 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinel, J.P., Pauli, P.: Biopsychologie (6. aktualisierte Auflage). Pearson Studium Verlag, München (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, M.J., Phillips, M.L.: Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 333–342 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., Esteves, F.: Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 466 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salemink, E., Van den Hout, M.A., Kindt, M.: Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behav. Res. Ther. 45, 607–615 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, S., Hamrick, N.: Stable individual differences in physiological response to stressors: implications for stress-elicited changes in immune related health. Brain Behav. Immun. 17, 407–414 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, S.E., Klein, L.C., Lewis, B.P., Gruenewald, T.L., Gurung, R.A.R., Updegraff, J.A.: Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend not fight-or-flight. Psychol. Rev. 107, 411 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buss, D.M.: How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 359–366 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fetchenhauer, D., Bierhoff, H.-W.: Altruismus aus Evolutionstheoretischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 35, 131–141 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bliege Bird, R., Smith, E.A.: Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Curr. Anthropol. 46, 221–248 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber, N.: The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16, 395–424 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buss, D.M., Schmitt, D.P.: Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev. 100, 204 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R.: The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18, 69–88 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Symons, D.: The psychology of human mate preferences. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 34–35 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buss, D.M., Shackelford, T.K., Kirkpatrick, L.A., Larsen, R.J.: A half century of mate preferences: the cultural evolution of values. J. Marriage Fam. 63, 491–503 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buss, D.M.: Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 1–14 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buss, D.M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Czapinski, J., Deraad, B., Ekehammar, B., et al.: International preferences in selecting mates a study of 37 cultures. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 21, 5–47 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Festinger, L.: Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207(4), 93–107 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherman, D.K., Cohen, G.L.: The psychology of self-defense: self-affirmation theory. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 183–242 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bear, M.F., Connors, B.W., Paradiso, M.A.: Neuroscience Exploring the Brain. Lipppincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Birbaumer, N., Schmidt, R.F.: Biologische Psychologie. (6., vollständig überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage). Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Damasio, A., Carvalho, G.B.: The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 143–152 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Berridge, K.C., Robinson, T.E.: What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. 28, 309–369 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cloninger, C.R.: A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 44, 573 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Litman, J.: Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: wanting and liking new information. Cogn. Emot. 19, 793–814 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., Schumann, D.: Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. J. Consum. Res. 10, 135–146 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pinker, S.: The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Penguin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Psychology Press, UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roy Chaudhuri, H., Mazumdar, S., Ghoshal, A.: Conspicuous consumption orientation: conceptualisation, scale development and validation. J. Consum. Behav. 10, 216–224 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kindermann, H.: Warum wir tun, was wir tun. Trauner Verlag Linz (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, J., Shrum, L.J.: Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: a differential needs explanation. J. Consum. Res. 39, 530–544 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Cass, A., McEwen, H.: Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. J. Consum. Behav. 4, 25–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott, M.L., Mende, M., Bolton, L.E.: Judging the book by its cover? how consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer-seller relationships. J. Mark. Res. 50, 334–347 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eastwick, P.W., Finkel, E.J.: Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 245 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Townsend, J.M., Levy, G.D.: Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Arch. Sex. Behav. 19, 149–164 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Townsend, J.M., Wasserman, T.: Sexual attractiveness: sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 171–191 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Kindermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kindermann, H. (2015). (Online)-Buying Behavior and Personality Traits: Evolutionary Psychology and Neuroscience Based. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18702-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics