Skip to main content

Complications Following Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Acellular Dermal Matrix

  • Chapter
Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background: The recent increase in popularity of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assistance in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction has led to variety of viewpoints. Many studies are published indicating an increase in complications with the use of ADM, while others indicate there is no increase in complications.

Methods: This meta-analysis utilizes information from all available studies that directly compare ADM with traditional methods of immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction. There was over a twofold increase in the number of infections and explanations in the ADM group compared to the control. There was a threefold increase in seroma formation in the ADM group compared to the control. There was a significant difference of intraoperative fill volumes between the ADM group compared to the control. This study illustrates that after pooling all available date regarding the use of ADM in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction there appears to be an increased rate of complications. However, the increased intraoperative fill volume may lead to ultimately greater patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):232–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1735–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, Arora BP, Katz SM, Gelfand MA, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2010) The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):674–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen MD, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Morris DJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT (2010) Infectious complications leading to explantation in implant-based breast reconstruction With AlloDerm. Eplasty 10, e48

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283(15):2008–2012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM (2009) Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):752–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haase SC (2011) Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):955–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoppe IC, Yueh JH, Wei CH, Ahuja NK, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO (2011) Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eplasty 11, e40

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Berlin JA (1997) Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 350(9072):185–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nahabedian MY (2009) AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1743–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2008) The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 60(5):510–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ (2010) Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1606–1614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW, Guo L (2011) Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1755–1762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G (2012) Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits? Ann Plast Surg 68(5):425–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanna KR, DeGeorge BR Jr, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB (2013) Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg 70(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57S–66S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Parks JW, Hammond SE, Walsh WA, Adams RL, Chandler RG, Luce EA (2012) Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):739–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(6):901e–908e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):403e–410e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1049–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN (2003) Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG (2008) Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(3):418–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Breuing KH, Colwell AS (2007) Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59(3):250–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM (2006) Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 56(1):22–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Namnoum JD (2009) Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):387–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E (2007) Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(2):373–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, Kim K, Taghinia AH, Sinno HH, Lee BT, Lin SJ (2013) Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1057–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pannucci CJ, Antony AK, Wilkins EG (2013) The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: an analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Hoppe M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoppe, I.C., Ahuja, N.K., Datiashvili, R.O. (2016). Complications Following Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Acellular Dermal Matrix. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Breast Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_148

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_148

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18725-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18726-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics