Skip to main content

Laypeople’s Perspectives on Electromobility: A Focus Group Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Internet of Things. IoT Infrastructures (IoT360 2014)

Abstract

Although many electric cars are readily available on the market and the charging infrastructure is expanded, the majority of people is still reluctant to buy and use an electric car. It is assumed that underlying motives and mental models play decisive roles for the acceptance. To gain insights into laypeople’s concepts concerning electromobility, three focus group studies on perceived benefits and barriers with a total of 24 participants were conducted in which the participants discussed their perceived benefits and barriers of electric mobility. It was found that while participants’ perceived benefits referred almost exclusively to environmental issues, the barriers concerned multiple thematic areas such as costs, infrastructure, security of the technology, and practicability. Overall, it has become obvious that many misconceptions and prejudices against electromobility and electric cars still exist which can only be overcome by adequate information and communication concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kraftfahrtbundesamt (German Federal Motor Transport Authority): Fahrzeugzulassungen. Neuzulassungen von Kraftfahrzeugen nach Umwelt-Merkmalen. Jahr 2013. (New registrations of cars according to environmental features) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buehler, F., Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: Usage patterns of electric vehicles as a reliable indicator for acceptance? Findings from a German Field Study. In: Presented at the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axsen, J., Orlebar, C., Skippon, S.: Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: the case of a U.K. workplace electric-vehicle study. Ecol. Econ. 95, 96–107 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, M., King, N., Harris, M., Lewis, E.: Electric vehicle drivers’ reported interactions with the public: driving stereotype change? Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 17, 33–44 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy. 48, 717–729 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ziegler, A.: Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 46, 1372–1385 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Krems, J.F.: Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: understanding psychological barriers. Appl. Psychol. 61, 368–391 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, C., Hinkeldein, D., Graff, A., Kramer, S.: What do potential users think about electric mobility? In: Hülsmann, M., Fornahl, D. (eds.) Evolutionary Paths Towards the Mobility Patterns of the Future, pp. 85–99. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Kasugai, K., Schwalm, M.: Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services, pp. 628–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Zaunbrecher, B.S., Kasugai, K: Integrating the “E” in public transport. In: Giaffreda, R., Caganova, D., Li, Y., Riggio, R., Voisard, A. (eds.) IoT 2014, LNICST, vol. 151, pp. 150–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greaves, S., Backman, H., Ellison, A.B.: An empirical assessment of the feasibility of battery electric vehicles for day-to-day driving. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 66, 226–237 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearre, N.S., Kempton, W., Guensler, R.L., Elango, V.V.: Electric vehicles: how much range is required for a day’s driving? Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19, 1171–1184 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded partly by the Excellence Initiative of the German State and Federal Government (Project UFO), partly by the German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Project econnect Germany, ref. no. 01 ME 12052.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara S. Zaunbrecher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zaunbrecher, B.S., Beul-Leusmann, S., Ziefle, M. (2015). Laypeople’s Perspectives on Electromobility: A Focus Group Study. In: Giaffreda, R., Cagáňová, D., Li, Y., Riggio, R., Voisard, A. (eds) Internet of Things. IoT Infrastructures. IoT360 2014. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19743-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19743-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19742-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19743-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics