Skip to main content

Counteracting Anchoring Effects in Group Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9146))

Abstract

Similar to single user decisions, group decisions can be affected by decision biases. In this paper we analyze anchoring effects as a specific type of decision bias in the context of group decision scenarios. On the basis of the results of a user study in the domain of software requirements prioritization we discuss results regarding the optimal time when preference information of other users should be disclosed to the current user. Furthermore, we show that explanations can increase the satisfaction of group members with various aspects of a group decision process (e.g., satisfaction with the decision and decision support quality).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Curley, S., Zhang, J.: Recommender systems, consumer preferences, and anchoring effects. In: Decisions@RecSys 2011, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 35–42 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Curley, S., Zhang, J.: De-biasing user preference ratings in recommender systems. In: RecSys 2014 Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS 2014), Foster City, CA, USA, pp. 2–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyer, J.: MAUT - multi attribute utility theory. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys of Intl. Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 78, pp. 265–292. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Felfernig, A.: Biases in decision making. In: Intl. Worksh. on Decision Making and Recommender Systems, vol. 1278, pp. 32–37. CEUR Proceedings (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Gula, B., Hitz, M., Kruggel, T., Leitner, G., Melcher, R., Riepan, D., Strauss, S., Teppan, E., Vitouch, O.: Persuasive recommendation: serial position effects in knowledge-based recommender systems. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 283–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Felfernig, A., Gula, B., Teppan, E.: Knowledge-based Recommender Technologies for Marketing and Sales. Intl. Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (IJPRAI) 21(2), 1–22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Felfernig, A., Zehentner, C., Ninaus, G., Grabner, H., Maalej, W., Pagano, D., Weninger, L., Reinfrank, F.: Group decision support for requirements negotiation. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds.) UMAP Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 7138, pp. 105–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gkika, S., Lekakos, G.: The persuasive role of explanations in recommender systems. In: 2nd Intl. Workshop on Behavior Change Support Systems (BCSS 2014), vol. 1153, pp. 59–68. CEUR Proceedings, Padua (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S.: Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 84(2), 332–339 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: CSCW 2000, pp. 241–250. ACM, Philadelphia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D.: Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(1), 1161–1166 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masthoff, J., Gatt, A.: In Pursuit of Satisfaction and the Prevention of Embarrassment: Affective State in Group Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 16(3–4), 281–319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S.: Knowing other’s preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Jrnl. of Personality & Social Psy. 98(5), 794–808 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy, J., Hofacker, C., Mizerski, R.: Primacy and Recency Effects on Clicking Behavior. Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 522–535 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pu, P., Chen, L.: Trust-inspiring Explanation Interfaces for Recommender Systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 542–556 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rodriguez, M., Steinbock, D., Watkins, J., Gershenson, C., Bollen, J., Grey, V., deGraf B.: Smartocracy: social networks for collective cecision making. In: HICSS 2007, pp. 90. IEEE, Big Island (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S., Jeran, M.: Counteracting serial position effects in the CHOICLA group decision support environment. In: 20th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2015), pp. 148–157. ACM, Atlanta (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Ninaus, G., Jeran, M., Reiterer, S., Leitner, G.: Configuring decision tasks. In: Configuration Workshop, Novi Sad, pp. 17–21 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teppan, E., Felfernig, A.: Minimization of Decoy Effects in Recommender Result Sets. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 10(4), 385–395 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explanations of recommendations. In: ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems 2007, pp. 203–206. ACM, Minneapolis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tversky, A., Simonson, I.: Context-dependent Preferences. Management Science 39(10), 1179–1189 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yardi, S., Hill, B., Chan, S.: VERN: facilitating democratic group decision making online. In: Intl. ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2005), pp. 116–119. ACM, Sanibel (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Felfernig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S. (2015). Counteracting Anchoring Effects in Group Decision Making. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. UMAP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20266-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20267-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics