Skip to main content

The New Prudent Man: Financial-Academic Capitalism and Inequality in Higher Education

  • Chapter
Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 45))

Abstract

For over one hundred years university endowments in the United States had been managed according to the common law “prudent man” principle that imposed the relatively conservative fiduciary responsibility for capital preservation upon university trustees. Beginning in the 1970s the prudent man concept was re-imagined to call for the maximization of return on endowment holdings and increased attention to long-term capital accumulation. This chapter shows how the transformation of the prudent man principle coincided with restructuring in the broader political economy and especially the globalization of finance. It is argued that endowment management is now a form of financial-academic capitalism in which universities engage in market activities to generate profit in order to secure advantage over competitor institutions by amassing wealth, which is in turn associated with prestige and field status. This advantage is reinforced by historical positional and taxation policy. Wealth and status advantages result in inequality, and I argue that endowment management is one contributing factor to the steep and persistent stratification that characterizes higher education in the U.S. Institutional inequality presents implications for social opportunity and equity. The chapter concludes with policy recommendations related to institutional wealth management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Two multi-campus public university systems – University of Texas and Texas A&M University – have been excluded from this analysis because they claim a large share of the state’s “Permanent Fund” a sovereign wealth fund derived from Texas’ mineral resources. As a result these university endowments are not comparable to other university endowments.

References

  • Arnold, C. (2006). Yale’s money guru shares wisdom with masses. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6203264

  • Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Organizing higher education: A manifesto. In M. N. Bastedo (Ed.), Organizing higher education: Managing colleges for a new era (pp. 3–17). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. (1980). The costs of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per student and how much should they spend? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., Rose, S. J., & Cheah, B. (2011). The college payoff: Education, occupations. Washington, DC: Lifetime Earnings. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, J. (2014). Organization, administration, and leadership: Addressing the relevance gap in higher education research. A Community of Higher Education Scholars. http://aeradivisionj.blogspot.com/2014/07/organization-administration-and.html

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, C. L. (2003). The sources and uses of annual giving at selective research universities and liberal arts colleges. Economics of Education Review, 22, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1996). Globalizing capital: A history of the International Monetary System. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford Foundation. (1969). Managing educational endowments. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliner, E. (1994). States and the reemergence of global finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, J. (2010). Educational endowments and the financial crisis: Social costs and systematic risks in the Shadow Banking System. A study of six New England Schools. Boston: Tellus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980–1992. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. J., & Eckel, P. D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochard, L., & Ritteriser, C. (2008). Foundation and endowment investing: Philosophies and strategies of top investors and institutions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., Schoar, A., & Wang, J. (2008). Secrets of the academy: The drivers of university endowment success (No. w14341). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Cantwell, B. (2014). Vertical stratification and segmentation. Working paper, Dynamics of High Participation Societies Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F. (1990). Endowment: Perspectives, policies & management. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathies, C., & Slaughter, S. (2013). University trustees as channels between academe and industry: Toward an understanding of the executive science network. Research Policy, 42(6), 1286–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (2000). Education and development: Measuring the social benefits. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NACUBO. (2013). Endowment survey, 2012. New York: NACUBO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. (2011). ‘Hoarding assets’? Inside higher education. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/09/grassley-renews-focus-endowments#sthash.oFryc5Jo.dpbs

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., Bielby, R., & Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Access without equity longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1990). The higher learning and high technology: The dynamics of higher education policy. Albany: SUNY University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., Thomas, S. L., Johnson, D. R., & Barringer, S. N. (2014). Institutional conflict of interest: The role of interlocking directorates in the scientific relationships between universities and the corporate sector. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swensen, D. F. (2009). Pioneering portfolio management: An unconventional approach to institutional investment, fully revised and updated. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014). UNESCO Institute of Statistics. http://www.uis.unesco.org/datacentre/pages/default.aspx?SPSLanguage=EN

  • Vedder, R. (2014). Cut off Harvard to save America. Bloomberg View. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-02-19/cut-off-harvard-to-save-america

  • Waldeck, S. E. (2009). The coming showdown over endowments: Enlisting the donors. Fordham Law Review, 77, 1795–1836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (2009). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2005). Do measures of college quality matter? The effect of college quality on graduates’ earnings. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 571–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan Cantwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cantwell, B. (2016). The New Prudent Man: Financial-Academic Capitalism and Inequality in Higher Education. In: Slaughter, S., Taylor, B. (eds) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21511-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21512-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics