Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Review and Evaluation of Business Model Ontologies: A Viability Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 227))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1241 Accesses

Abstract

Organisations are increasingly becoming interdependent in order to create and deliver superior value to their customers. The resulting business models of such organisations are becoming increasingly complex and difficult to design, because they have to deal with multiple stakeholders and their competing interests, and with dynamic and fast paced markets. Hence, in order to ensure the long-term survival of such firms, it is crucial that their business models are viable. Business model ontologies (BMOs) are effective tools for designing and evaluating business models. However, the viability perspective has largely been ignored, and the current BMOs have not been evaluated on their capabilities to facilitate the design and evaluation of viable business models. In order to address this gap, current BMOs have been assessed from the viability perspective. To evaluate the BMOs, a list of 26 criteria is derived from the literature. This list of criteria is then applied to assess six well-established BMOs. The analysis reveals that none of the BMOs satisfies all the criteria. However, the e3-value satisfies most of the criteria, and it is most appropriate for designing and evaluating viable business models. Furthermore, the identified deficits clearly define the areas for enhancing the BMOs from a viability perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An enterprise architecture is defined as “a coherent whole of principles, methods, and models that are used in the design and realisation of an enterprise’s organisational structure, business processes, information systems, and infrastructure” [2].

References

  1. Adhikari, R.S., Aste, N., Manfren, M.: Multi-commodity network flow models for dynamic energy management-smart grid applications. Energy Procedia 14, 1374–1379 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lankshorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work-Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kraussl-Derzsi, Z.: OPerationalized ALignment: Assessing Feasibility of Value Constellations Exploiting Innovative Services. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gordijn, J., Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Comparing two business model ontologies for designing e-business models and value constellations. In: Proceedings of the 18th Bled eConference, pp. 6–8, Bled (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lasa, I.S., Laburu, C.O., De Castro Vila, R.: An evaluation of the value stream mapping tool. Bus. Process Manag. J. 14, 39–52 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy, W.E.: The rea accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Engelsman, W., Wieringa, R.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: two case studies and some lessons learned. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 7195, pp. 306–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In: 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, pp. 17–19, Bled (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pateli, A.G., Giaglis, G.M.: A research framework for analysing eBusiness models. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 13, 302–314 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Debei, M.M., Avison, D.: Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 359–376 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambert, S.: A Review of the Electronic Commerce Literature to Determine the Meaning of the Term ‘Business Model’. Flinders University of South Australia, School of Commerce (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(1), 1–25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, M.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Mayr, H.C., Liddle, S.W., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER Workshops 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, p. 40. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma, S., Gutiérrez, J.A.: An evaluation framework for viable business models for m-commerce in the information technology sector. Electron. Mark. 20, 33–52 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Reuver, M., Haaker, T.: Designing viable business models for context-aware mobile services. Telemat. Inform. 26, 240–248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keen, P., Qureshi, S.: Organizational transformation through business models: a framework for business model design. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual HICSS 2006, vol. 8, p. 206b. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requir. Eng. 8, 114–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mäkinen, S., Seppänen, M.: Assessing business model concepts with taxonomical research criteria: a preliminary study. Manag. Res. News 30, 735–748 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lambert, S.: A conceptual model analysis framework: Analysing and comparing business model frameworks and ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, International Business Management Association (IBMA) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Tapscott, D., Lowy, A., Ticoll, D.: Digital capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business Press, Watertown (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37, 1019–1042 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lepak, D.P., Smith, K.G., Taylor, M.S.: Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 180–194 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. Br. J. Manag. 11, 1–15 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amit, R., Zott, C.: Value creation in e-business. Strateg. Manag. J. 22, 493–520 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eriksson, H.E., Penker, M.: Business modeling with UML. Wiley, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press, Cary (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weill, P., Vitale, M.: What it infrastructure capabilities are needed to implement e-business models. MIS Q. Exec. 1, 17–34 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baden-Fuller, C., Haefliger, S.: Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan. 46, 419–426 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Allee, V.: A value network approach for modeling and measuring intangibles. In: Transparent Enterprise, Madrid (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rother, M., Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda.-Version 1.3. Learning Enterprise Institute, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been financed by a grant of the Energy Delta Gas Research (EDGaR) programme. EDGaR is co-financed by the Northern Netherlands Provinces, the European Fund for Regional Development, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Province of Groningen, the Netherlands. NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Communications and the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Media and IT, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Zernikeplein 11, Groningen, The Netherlands

    A. D’Souza & H. Velthuijsen

  2. Department of Operations, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, Groningen, The Netherlands

    G. B. Huitema & J. C. Wortmann

  3. Software Systems Research Group, NICTA Queensland, 70-72 Bowen Street, Spring Hill, 4000, Brisbane, Australia

    N. R. T. P. van Beest

Authors
  1. A. D’Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. R. T. P. van Beest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. B. Huitema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. C. Wortmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Velthuijsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D’Souza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. INSTICC, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal

    José Cordeiro

  2. MODESTE/ESEO, Angers, France

    Slimane Hammoudi

  3. Wroclaw University of Economics, Wroclaw, Poland

    Leszek Maciaszek

  4. MODESTE/ESEO, Angers, France

    Olivier Camp

  5. INSTICC, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal

    Joaquim Filipe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

D’Souza, A., van Beest, N.R.T.P., Huitema, G.B., Wortmann, J.C., Velthuijsen, H. (2015). A Review and Evaluation of Business Model Ontologies: A Viability Perspective. In: Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 227. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22347-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22348-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation