Skip to main content

Improving the Understanding of Supply Chain Interaction Through the Application of Business Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics in Logistics

Abstract

Dynamic systems such as global supply chains (SC) compel the workforce of all involved players to be faced with ever-changing working environments. This complexity makes it difficult to predict the impact of decisions taken, thus future SC managers need to be trained in taking decisions under uncertainty and to reflect the impact on the whole SC. This type of practical decision making is necessary to take shape within the business and engineering schools since it prepares future practitioners for the requirements they will face. Game-based learning (GBL) is well suited to GBL process. This paper compares two different game-based learning setups with students. The first explains a pure game-based course, whereas the other discusses how a new game is introduced in an undergraduate course on container security. Our comparison helps others to avoid pitfalls in the introduction of GBL in logistics education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angehrn AA, Maxwell K (2009) EagleRacing: addressing corporate collaboration challenges through an online simulation game. Innovate J Online Educ 5(6):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnab S, Lim T, Carvalho MB, Bellotti F, de Freitas S, Louchart S, Suttie N, Berta R, De Gloria A (2014) Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br J Educ Technol (BJET). doi:10.1111/bjet.12113

    Google Scholar 

  • Baalsrud Hauge J, Duin H, Oliveira M, Thoben K-D (2006) User requirements analysis for educational games in manufacturing. Proceedings of the ICE conference, pp 47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Baalsrud Hauge J, Duin H, Thoben K-D (2008) Increasing the resiliency of global SN by using games. In: Pawar KS, Lalwani CS, Banomyong R Conference Proceedings ISL 2008, Centre for Concurrent Enterprise, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham 2008, S. 125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Baalsrud Hauge J, Boyle E, Mayer I, Nadolski R, Riedel JCHK, Moreno-Ger P, Bellotti F, Lim T, Ritchie J (2013) Study design and data gathering guide for serious games’ evaluation. Psychology, pedagogy, and assessment in serious games. IGI Global 2014:394–419. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4773-2.ch018

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrat M (2004) Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manage: Int J 9(1):30–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck K et al (2006) Manifesto for agile software development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org. Accessed 12 Jan 2006

  • Bellotti F, Berta R, De Gloria A (2010) Designing effective serious games: opportunities and challenges for research. Special issue: creative learning with serious games. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (IJET) 5:22–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti F, Kapralos B, Lee K, Moreno-Ger P (2013) User assessment in serious games and technology-enhanced learning. Hindawi Adv Hum-Comput Interact

    Google Scholar 

  • Bödker S (1996) Creating condition for participation: Conflict and ressources in systems development. Hum-Comput Interact 11(3):215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm B (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21(5):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braziotis C, Tannock J (2011) Building the extended enterprise: key collaboration factors. Int J Logistics Manage 22(3):349–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASSANDRA (2014) www.cassandra-poject.eu. Accessed 27 Jan 2014

  • Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logistics Manage 15(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria AJ, Hutchinson D, Wellington WJ, Gold S (2009) Developments in business gaming: a review of the past 40 years. Simul Gaming 40(4):464–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintsa (2012) CASSANDRA COMPENDIUM, www.cassandra-project.eu/userdata/file/Publicdeliverables/Cassandra. Accessed 27 Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschule Bremerhaven (2014) www.hs-bremerhaven.de/en/. Accessed 27 Jan 2014

  • Hunecker F (2009) A generic process simulation-model for educational simulations and serious games. On the Horiz 17(4):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrity (2008) Global container supply chain compendium, integrity-supplychain.eu/index.php?module=Downloads&func=prep_hand_out&lid=82. Accessed 27 Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Integrity (2014) www.integrity-supplychain.eu. Accessed 27 Jan 2014

  • Jüttner U (2005) Supply chain risk management. Int J Logistics Manage 16(1):120–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuj I, Sahin F (2011) A model of supply chain and supply chain decision-making complexity. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 41(5):511–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael D, Chen S (2006) Serious games: games that educate, train and inform. Thomson Course Technology, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck H (2005) Drivers of SC vulnerability: an integrated framework. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 35(4):210–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck H (2003) Creating resilient SCs: a practical guide, Centre for Logistics and SC Management. Cranfield School of Management, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl H-C, Gallus P, Köhler H (2008) Supply Chain Risikomanagement—Vision oder pragmatisches Konzept? Ergebnisse des BVL-Arbeitskreises “Sicherheit und Risikomanagement in der Supply Chain”. In: Pfohl H-C, Wimmer T (eds) Wissenschaft und Praxis im Dialog. Robuste und sichere Logistiksysteme. 4. Wissenschaftssymposium Logistik. München. Hamburg, pp 446–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl H-C, Köhler H, Thomas D (2010) State of the art in supply chain risk management research. Empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logistics Res 2(1): 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl H-C (2002) Risiken und Chancen: Strategische Analyse der Supply Chain. In: Pfohl H-C (ed) Risiko- und Chancenmanagement in der Supply Chain: proaktiv - ganzheitlich - nachhaltig. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky M (2003) Digital game-based learning. ACM Comput Entertain 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybourn EM (2007) Interact Comput 19:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (2005) Building a resilient supply chain. Harvard Bus Rev Supply Chain Strategy 1(5):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute VJ, Ke F (2012) Games, learning, and assessment. In: Ifenthaler D, Eseryel D, Ge X (eds) Assessment in game-based learning: foundations, innovations and perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 43–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen L.B. (2005) How risk and uncertainty is used in SC management: a literature study, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey K, Tempest S (2005) The future of the business school: knowledge challenges and opportunities. Hum Relat 58(1):61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterhout MPA, Veenstra AW, Meijer MAG, Popal N, van der Berg J (2007) Visibility platforms for enhancing supply chain security: a case study in the port of rotterdam. Paper presented at the the international symposium on maritime safety. Security and Enviromental Protection, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters D (2007) Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has partially been carried out in the context of the EU project GALA Network of excellence, FP7.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jannicke Madeleine Baalsrud Hauge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baalsrud Hauge, J.M., Meyer-Larsen, N., Müller, R. (2016). Improving the Understanding of Supply Chain Interaction Through the Application of Business Games. In: Kotzab, H., Pannek, J., Thoben, KD. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23512-7_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23512-7_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23511-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23512-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics