Skip to main content

Decomposing Dynamical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

Abstract

Dynamical systems on monoids have been recently proposed as minimal mathematical models for the intuitive notion of deterministic dynamics. This paper shows that any dynamical system DS L on a monoid L can be exhaustively decomposed into a family of mutually disconnected subsystems—the constituent systems of D S L . In addition, constituent systems are themselves indecomposable, even though they may very well be complex. Finally, this work also makes clear how any dynamical system DS L turns out to be identical to the sum of all its constituent systems. Constituent systems can thus be thought as the indecomposable, but possibly complex, building blocks to which the dynamics of an arbitrary complex system fully reduces. However, no further reduction of the constituents is possible, even if they are themselves complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The state space of a cellular automaton is discrete (i.e. finite or countably infinite) if the cellular automaton state space only includes finite configurations, that is to say, configurations where all but a finite number of cells are in the quiescent state. If this condition is not satisfied, the state space has the power of the continuum.

  2. 2.

    My thanks to Tomasz Kowalski for pointing out to me the relation between vector spaces over fields and dynamical systems on monoids.

References

  1. Arnold, V. I. (1977). Ordinary differential equations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giunti, M. (1997). Computation, dynamics, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giunti, M., & Mazzola, C. (2012). Dynamical systems on monoids: Toward a general theory of deterministic systems and motion. In G. Minati, M. Abram, & E. Pessa (Eds.), Methods, models, simulations and approaches towards a general theory of change (pp. 173–185). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirsch, M. W., Smale, S., & Devaney, R. L. (2004). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Szlenk, W. (1984). An introduction to the theory of smooth dynamical systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfram, S. (1983). Cellular automata. Los Alamos Science, 9, 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Giunti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giunti, M. (2016). Decomposing Dynamical Systems. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24391-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics