Skip to main content

Towards a Robot Computational Model to Preserve Dignity in Stigmatizing Patient-Caregiver Relationships

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9388))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with an expressive mask are particularly vulnerable to stigmatization during interactions with their caregivers due to their inability to express affect through nonverbal channels. Our approach to uphold PD patient dignity is through the use of an ethical robot that mediates patient shame when it recognizes norm violations in the patient-caregiver interaction. This paper presents the basis for a computational model tasked with computing patient shame and the empathetic response of a caregiver during “empathetic opportunities” in their interaction. A PD patient is liable to suffer indignity when there is a substantial difference between his experienced shame and the empathy shown by the caregiver. When this difference falls outside of acceptable set bounds (norms), the robotic agent will act using subtle, nonverbal cues to guide the relationship back within these bounds, preserving patient dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, R.C., Ulam, P.: An ethical adaptor: behavioral modification derived from moral emotions. In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA), pp. 381–387. IEEE, December 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, A.G., Arkin, R.C.: Behavioral overlays for non-verbal communication expression on a humanoid robot. Autonomous Robots 22(1), 55–74 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, T.R., Wolf, S.T., Panter, A.T., Insko, C.A.: Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Person. & Social Psych. 100(5), 947–966 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Claxton-Oldfield, S., Banzen, Y.: Personality characteristics of hospice palliative care volunteers: the ‘‘big five’’and empathy. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 27(6), 407–412 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(1), 113 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giner-Sorolla, R.: 5 shame and guilt. In: Judging Passions: Moral Emotions in Persons and Groups. Psychology Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gottschalk, L.A.: Some psychoanalytic research into the communication of meaning through language: the quality and magnitude of psychological states*. British Journal of Medical Psychology 44(2), 131–147 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haidt, J.: The moral emotions. Handbook of Affective Sciences 11, 852–870 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman, G., Zuckerman, O., Hirschberger, G., Luria, M., Shani-Sherman, T.: Design and evaluation of a peripheral robotic conversation companion. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, D.A., Scragg, P., Turner, S.: The role of shame and guilt in traumatic events: A clinical model of shame-based and guilt-based PTSD. British Journal of Medical Psychology 74(4), 451–466 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasoz, F., Alvarez, K., Lisetti, C.L., Finkelstein, N.: Emotion recognition from physiological signals using wireless sensors for presence technologies. Cognition, Technology & Work 6(1), 4–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niezink, L.W., Siero, F.W., Dijkstra, P., Buunk, A.P., Barelds, D.P.: Empathic concern: Distinguishing between tenderness and sympathy. Motiv. & Emotion 36(4), 544–549 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nijhof, G.: Parkinson’s disease as a problem of shame in public appearance. Sociology of Health & Illness 17(2), 193–205 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordenfelt, L.: Dignity of the elderly: an introduction. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6(2), 99–101 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oertel, W.H., Ellgring, H.: Parkinson’s disease—medical education and psychosocial aspects. Patient Education and Counseling 26(1), 71–79 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, D., Choi, S.W., Victorson, D., Bode, R., Peterman, A., Heinemann, A., Cella, D.: Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI). Quality of Life Research 18(5), 585–595 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Retzinger, S.M.: Violent emotions: Shame and rage in marital quarrels. Sage (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigues, S., Mascarenhas, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A.: “I can feel it too!”: emergent empathic reactions between synthetic characters. In: 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops. ACII 2009, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sabini, J., Garvey, B., Hall, A.L.: Shame and embarrassment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(1), 104–117 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smits, D.J., De Boeck, P.: A componential IRT model for guilt. Multivariate Behavioral Research 38(2), 161–188 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinbock, A.J.: Shame. in Moral emotions: Reclaiming the evidence of the heart. Northwestern University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suchman, A.L., Markakis, K., Beckman, H.B., Frankel, R.: A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. Jama 277(8), 678–682 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahashi, K., Tickle-Degnen, L., Coster, W.J., Latham, N.K.: Expressive behavior in Parkinson’s disease as a function of interview context. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 64(3), 484–495 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tickle-Degnen, L.: Chapter 14: Therapeutic rapport. In: Radomsky, M.V., Trombly Latham, C.A. (eds.) Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 7th edn, pp. 412–427. Lippincott William & Wilkins, Baltimore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tickle-Degnen, L., Zebrowitz, L.A., Ma, H.I.: Culture, gender and health care stigma: Practitioners’ response to facial masking experienced by people with Parkinson’s disease. Social Science & Medicine 73(1), 95–102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Uy, C.C., Jeffrey, I.A., Wilson, M., Aluru, V., Madan, A., Lu, Y., Raghavan, P.: Autonomic Mechanisms of Emotional Reactivity and Regulation. Psychology 4(08), 669–675 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zinn, W.: The empathic physician. Archives of Internal Medicine 153(3), 306–312 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Pettinati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pettinati, M.J., Arkin, R.C. (2015). Towards a Robot Computational Model to Preserve Dignity in Stigmatizing Patient-Caregiver Relationships. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics