Skip to main content

Mosaic Evolution in Cultural Frameworks: Skateboard Decks and Projectile Points

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Phylogenetics

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Evolution Research ((IDER,volume 4))

Abstract

There has been significant debate in paleoanthropology and more recently, archaeology, over the concept of mosaic evolution. Essentially, proponents of the concept argue that different aspects of organisms evolve separately while others argue that organisms evolve as integrated entities. Similarly, archaeologists debate the relevance of cultural evolution as a complex multi-scalar process. In this paper we conduct two cladistic analyses of cultural phenomena focusing on skateboard decks and projectile points from an archaeological site to examine variability in the evolutionary process. We find evidence for mosaic evolution in both studies and conclude that modularity likely is an important factor in cultural evolution, at least at the level of artifact design. We caution future investigators of evolution in ancient stone tools that modularity could have complicating effects on phylogenetic outcomes unless explicitly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrefsky, W., Jr. (2009). Lithics: Macroscopic approaches to analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Mulder, M. B., Durham, W. H., & Richerson, P. J. (1997). Are cultural phylogenies possible? In P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richerson, S. Maasen (Eds.), Human by nature: Between biology and the social sciences (pp. 355–384). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, C. L. (1995). Biocultural interaction and the mechanism of mosaic evolution in the emergence of “Modern” morphology. American Anthropologist, 97, 711–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. N. (1999). The units of selection revisited: The modules of selection. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B., & Collard, M. (2007). Investigating the peopling of North America through cladistic analysis of early paleoindian projectile points. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 366–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatters, J. C. (2009). A macroevolutionary perspective on the archaeological record of North America. In A. M. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 213–234). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatters, J. C., Hackenberger, S., Lenz, B., Prentiss, A. M., Thomas, J-L. (2012). The paleoindian to archaic transition in the pacific northwest: In situ development or ethnic replacement. In C. B. Bousman, & B. J. Vierra (Eds.), On the brink: Transformations in human organization and adaptation at the pleistocene-holocene boundary in North America (pp. 37–66). Texas: Texas A & M Press, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. A., & Middleton, K. M. (2008). Mosaicism, modules, and the evolution of birds: Results from a Bayesian approach to the study of morphological evolution using discrete character data. Systematic Biology, 57, 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, M., Shennan, S. J., & Tehrani, J. J. (2006). Branching, blending, and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crema, E. R., Kerig, T., & Shennan, S. (2014). Culture, space, and metapopulation: A simulation-based study for evaluating signals for blending and branching. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43, 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagg, J. L. (2011). Exploring mouse trap history. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwent, J., & O’Brien, M. J. (2006). Using cladistics to construct lineages of projectile points from Northeast Missouri. In C. P. Lipo, M. J. O’Brien, M. Collard, & S. J. Shennan (Eds.), Mapping our ancestors: Phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory (pp. 185–208). New York: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1989). Aspects of the application of evolutionary theory in archaeology. In C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (Ed.), Archaeological thought in America (pp. 35–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (2000). Biological and material cultural evolution: Are there any true parallels? Perspectives in Ethology, 13, 113–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (2006). Forward. In C. Lipo, M. J. O’Brien, M. Collard, & S. J. Shennan (Eds.), Mapping our ancestors: Phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory (pp. xiii–xvi). New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (2009). Material cultural macroevolution. In A. M. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 297–316). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, Niles (2011) Paleontology and Cornets: Thoughts on Material Cultural Evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach 4:364-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flenniken, J. J., & Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological projectile point typology: Replication experimentation and technological analysis. American Antiquity, 51, 603–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, N., Jones, G. T., & Beck, C. (2011). Natural selection and material culture. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, J. (2010). Skateboard history time line – 1920s to 2010. http://jimgoodrich.net/skateboardtimeline.htm.

  • Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.

  • Hughes, S. S. (1998). Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistory weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 345–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P., & Shennan, S. (2009). Diversity in hunter-gatherer technological traditions: Mapping trajectories of cultural ‘descent with modification’ in Northeast California. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 342–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, T. S. (2007a). The concept of correlated progression as the basis of a model for the evolutionary origin of major new taxa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 1667–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, T. S. (2007b). The origin of higher taxa: Macroevolutionary processes, and the case of the mammals. Acta Zoologica, 88, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Mary Lou (2012) The Paleoindian to Archaic Transition: The Northwestern Plains and Rocky Mountains. In C. Britt Bousman and Bradley J. Vierra (eds.), From the Pleistocene to the Holocene: Human Organization and Cultural Transformations in Prehistoric North America, pp. 149-170. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü, J., Unwin, D. M., Jin, X., Liu, Y., & Ji, Q. (2010). Evidence for modular evolution in a long-tailed pterosaur with a pterodactyloid skull. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, V. J. (1973). Origin and evolution of the elephantidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 63, 1–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. H. (1994). Tempo and mode in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 91, 6780–6786.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L. (2003). Cladistics and archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J., Darwent, J., & Lyman, R. L. (2001). Cladistics is useful for reconstructing archaeological phylogenies: Paleoindian points from the Southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 1115–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pääbo, S. (2003). The mosaic that is our genome. Nature, 421, 409–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A. M., & Kuijt, I. (2012). People of the middle fraser canyon: An archaeological history. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A. M. Cross, G., Foor, T. A., Markle, D., Hogan, M., & Clarke, D. S. (2008). Evolution of a late prehistoric winter village on the interior plateau of British Columbia: Geophysical investigations, radiocarbon dating, and spatial analysis of the bridge river site. American Antiquity, 73, 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A. M., Goodale, N. B., Harris, L. E., & Crossland, N. (2014). The evolution of the ground slate tool industry at the bridge river site, British Columbia. In N. B. Goodale, & W. Andrefsky Jr. (Eds.), Lithic technological systems: Stone, evolution, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A. M., Skelton, R. R., Eldredge, N., & Quinn, C. P. (2011). Get rad! The evolution of the skateboard deck. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, G. (2002). Modularity and the units of evolution. Theory in Bioscience, 121, 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (2011). History written in stone: Evolutionary analysis of stone tools in archaeology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, R. R., & McHenry, H. M. (1998). Trait list bias and a reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny. Journal of Human Evolution, 34, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M. (1998). Macroevolution: pattern and process. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani, J. (2011). Patterns of evolution in Iranian tribal textiles. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 39–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani, J., & Collard, M. (2002). Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21, 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, J. (2002). The answer is never: A Skateboarder’s History of the World. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nathalie Gontier for inviting us to participate in the AAA session in San Francisco and to contribute this paper. Bridge River projectile point data derive from excavations funded by the National Science Foundation (BCS-0713013) and conducted via a collaborative partnership between the University of Montana and the Bridge River Band (Xwisten) and St’át’imc Nation. Skateboards in Fig. 1 were drawn by Eric Carlson. We thank Larissa Mendoza Straffon and two peer reviewers for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Marie Prentiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prentiss, A.M., Walsh, M.J., Skelton, R.R., Mattes, M. (2016). Mosaic Evolution in Cultural Frameworks: Skateboard Decks and Projectile Points. In: Mendoza Straffon, L. (eds) Cultural Phylogenetics. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25928-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics