Skip to main content

Strategic Learning Meta-Model (SLM): Architecture of the Personalized Virtual Learning Environment (PVLE) Based on the Cloud Computing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications (MICAI 2015)

Abstract

In this paper a Personalized Virtual Learning Environment (PVLE) architecture is presented which integrates three components is as follows: (I) the Learning Management System (LMS); (II) the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE); and (III) the Ontological Model (OM). The components were implemented as a solution for Cloud Computing. The fieldwork considered two stages: a proof of concept that is used as a benchmark and test cases where the PVLE were applied. We observed during the performance of stage 1 the average scores for thought styles (logical processes, creative, relational) considerably remain unchanged. While in stage 2, we observed the scores average has increased, with a tendency to improve creative, logical and process styles. Therefore, there is a significant contribution in the development of students’ cognitive profile to personalize its learning activities and the use of PVLE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smyth, K.: The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. J. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 29(3), 370–378 (2004). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0260293042000197609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sangster, A.: Objective tests, learning to learn and learning styles. J. Account. Educ. 5(2), 131–146 (1996). https://www.academia.edu/1087355/Objective_tests_learning_to_learn_and_learining_styles

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cassidy, S.: Assessing ‘inexperienced’ students ability to self-assess: exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. J. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 32(3), 313–330 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. García-Ros, R., Pérez-González, F.: Assessment preferences of pre-service teachers: analysis according to academic level and relationship with learning styles and motivational orientation. Teach. High. Educ. 16(6), 719–731 (2011). doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.570434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B., Kurbanoğlu, S.: Students’ opinions on blended learning and its implementation in terms of their learning styles. Educ. Inf. Technol. 16(5), 5–23 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verhoeven, J.C., Heerwegh, D., De Wit, K.: First year university students’ self-perception of ICT skills: Do learning styles matter? Educ. Inf. Technol. 17(1), 109–133 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10639-010-9149-1. http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/573/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10639-010-9149-1.pdf?auth66=1398547037_849a524bcd42be568e4d014600e5aea3&ext=.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnett, C.: Medium for empowerment or a ‘centre for everything’: students’ experience of control in virtual learning environments within a university context. Educ. Inf. Technol. 16(3), 245–258 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrell, G., Leung, Y.: Innovative online assessment using confidence measurement. Educ. Inf. Technol. 9(1), 5–19 (2004). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FB%3AEAIT.0000024258.29560.3c#page-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall, G.: A trio of evaluation and assessment models from pre ICT innovations: lessons from the past. Educ. Inf. Technol. 15(1), 37–50 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolb, D.: Experiential Learning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coll, C., Barberà, E., Onrubia, J.: La atención a la diversidad en las prácticas de evaluación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, GRINTIE 90, 111–132 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dochy, F., Segers, M.Y., Dierick, S.: Nuevas Vías de Aprendizaje y Enseñanza y sus Consecuencias: una Nueva Era de Evaluación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 2(2). Recuperado de http://revistas.um.es/redu/article/view/20051/19411

  13. Guzmán, E., Conejo, R.: Self-assessment in a feasible. Adapt. Web-Based Test. Syst. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48(4), 688–695 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mödritscher, F., Andergassen, M., Lai-Chong, E., García-Barrios, V.: Application of learning curves for didactic model evaluation: case studies. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 8(4), 62–69 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Odeh, S., Qaraeen, O.: Evaluation methods and techniques for e-learning software for school students in primary stages. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2(3), 1–8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tedman, R., Loudon, R., Wallace, B., Pountney, H.: Integrating regular, on-line evaluation by students into the curriculum review process in an Australian medical program. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 4(3), 59–66 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Samarakou, M., Papadakis, A., Fylladitakis, E., Hatziapostolou, A., Tsaganou, G., Gerrit, W.: An open learning environment for the diagnosis, assistance and evaluation of students based on artificial intelligence. Inter. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 9(3), 36–44 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahmani, B., Mohammed, S., Catherine, C., Pierre, C.: Adaptive exercises generation using an automated evaluation and a domain ontology: the ODALA+ approach. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 6(2), 4–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rezgui, K., Mhiri, H., Ghédira, K.: An ontology-based profile for learner representation in learning networks. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 9(3), 16–25 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali, S., Abdel-Rahman, T., Jahankhani, H., Yarandi, M.: Towards an ontological learners? Modelling approach for personalised e-learning. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 8(2), 4–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hackelbusch, R.: Ontological representation of academic programs. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 1(3), 1–3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Capuano, N., Mangione, G., Pierri, A., Salerno, S.: Personalization and contextualization of learning experiences based on semantics. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 9(7), 5–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mencke, S., Dumke, R.: Didactical ontologies. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 3(1), 65–73 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Using ontological engineering to organize learning/instructional theories and build a theory-aware authoring system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 19, 211–252 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Colace, F., De Santo, M., Greco, L.: E-learning and personalized learning path: a proposal based on the adaptive educational hypermedia system. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 9(2), 9–16 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abik, M., Ajhoun, R.: Normalization and personalization of learning situation: NPLS. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 4(2), 4–10 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jovanovic, D., Milosevic, D., Zizovic, M.: INDeLER: eLearning personalization by mapping student’s learning style and preference to metadata. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 3(4), 41–50 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saul, C., Wuttke, H.: An adaptation model for personalized e-assessments. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 8, 5–12 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Swinke, T.: A unique, culture-aware, personalized learning environment. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 7, 31–36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Herrmann Ned, S.L.M.: The Creative Brain. Brain Books, Búfalo (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Silva-López, R.B., Silva-López, M.I., Méndez-Gurrola, I., Bravo, M., Sánchez, V.: GODeM: a graphical ontology design methodology. Res. Comput. Sci. 84(2014), 17–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Silva-López, R.B., Méndez-Gurrola, I.I., Herrera, O.: Metamodelo de aprendizaje estratégico (MAE): Arquitectura de la capa de infraestructura, solución basada en la cloud computing. Res. Comput. Sci. 93(2015), 175–188 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Silva-López, R., Méndez-Gurrola, I., Sánchez-Arias, V.: Strategic learning, towards a teaching reengineering. Res. Comp. Sci. 65(2013), 133–145 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Silva-López, R.B., Silva-López, M., Méndez-Gurrola, I.I., Bravo, M.: Onto design graphics (ODG): a graphical notation to standardize ontology design. In: Gelbukh, A., Espinoza, F.C., Galicia-Haro, S.N. (eds.) MICAI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8856, pp. 443–452. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafaela Blanca Silva-López .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva-López, R.B., Méndez-Gurrola, I.I., Alcántara, O.H., Silva-López, M.I., Fallad-Chávez, J. (2015). Strategic Learning Meta-Model (SLM): Architecture of the Personalized Virtual Learning Environment (PVLE) Based on the Cloud Computing. In: Pichardo Lagunas, O., Herrera Alcántara, O., Arroyo Figueroa, G. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications. MICAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27101-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27101-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27100-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27101-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics