Skip to main content

The Relationship Between the (Mis)-Parsing of Coarticulation in Perception and Sound Change: Evidence from Dissimilation and Language Acquisition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Nonlinear Speech Processing

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 48))

  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

The study is concerned with whether historical sound change is more likely to occur when coarticulation, or the way that speech sounds overlap with and influence each other in time, is misaligned in production and perception. The focus of the first experiment was on long-range coarticulatory lip-rounding that has been linked with historical dissimilation. A perception experiment based on present-day Italian showed that inherently lip-rounded segments were more likely to be masked—and thereby erroneously deleted—in hypoarticulated speech. The second experiment tested whether the mismatch between the modalities was more likely in young children than in adults. For this purpose, first language German speakers participated in a forced-choice perception experiment in which they categorised German back and front vowels in coarticulatory non-fronting and fronting consonantal contexts. Children’s ability to normalise for coarticulation was shown to be less than that of the adults. Taken together, the results suggest that sound change can occur when coarticulatory relationships are perceptually obscured due to a hypoarticulated speaking style causing consonants to be camouflaged in the case of dissimilation and variants to approximate those that are strongly influenced by coarticulation in the case of diachronic back vowel fronting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrego-Collier, C.: Liquid dissimilation as listener hypocorrection. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 3–17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alderete, J., Frisch, S.: Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon. In: de Lacy, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckman, M., Li, F., Kong, E., Edwards, J.: Aligning the timelines of phonological acquisition and change. Lab. Phonol. 5, 151–194 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beddor, P.: A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language 85, 785–821 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beddor, P.: Perception grammars and sound change. In: Solé, M.-J., Recasens, D. (eds.) The Initiation of Sound Change. Perception, Production, and Social Factors, pp. 37–55. John Benjamin, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blevins, J.: Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Browman, C., Goldstein, L.: Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49, 155–180 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bybee, J.: Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Lang. Var. Change 14, 261–290 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, M., Wang, W.: Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language 51, 255–281 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cutler, A., Foss, R.: On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Lang. Speech 20, 1–10 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Jong, K.: The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 491–504 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Imperio, M.: Italian intonation: an overview and some questions. Probus 14(1), 37–69 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Foulkes, P., Vihman, M.: Language acquisition and phonological change. In: Honeybone, P., Salmons, J.C. (eds.) The Handbook of Historical Phonology. OUP, Oxford (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler, C.: Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Percept. Psychophys. 36, 359–368 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fowler, C.: Speech as a supramodal or amodal phenomenon. In Calvert, G., Spence, C., Stein, B. (eds.) The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, pp. 189–201. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fowler, C.: Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: effects of coarticulation resistance. J. Phonetics 33, 199–213 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fowler, C., Housum, J.: Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. J. Memory Lang. 26, 489–504 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fowler, C., Smith, M.: Speech perception as “vector analysis”: an approach to the problems of segmentation and invariance. In: Perkell, J., Klatt, D. (eds.) Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, pp. 123–139. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fowler, C., Thompson, J.M.: Listeners’ perception of “compensatory shortening”. Attention Percep. Psychophys. 72, 481–491 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujisaki, H., Kunisaki, O.: Analysis, recognition and perception of voiceless fricative consonants in Japanese. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logop. Phoniatr. 10, 145–156 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grammont, M.: Observations sur le langage des enfants. In: Mélanges Linguistiques Offerts aI M. Antoine Meillet, pp. 115–131. Klincksieck, Paris (1902)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grosvald, M.: Interspeaker variation in the extent and perception of long-distance vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. J. Phonetics 37, 173–188 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grosvald, M., Corina, D.: The production and perception of sub-phonemic vowel contrasts and the role of the listener in sound change. In: Solé, M.-J., Recasens, D. (eds.) The Initiation of Sound Change. Perception, Production, and Social Factors, pp. 77–100. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harrington, J.: Evidence for a relationship between synchronic variability and diachronic change in the Queen’s annual Christmas broadcasts. In: Cole, J., Hualde, J. (eds.) Laboratory Phonology, vol. 9, pp. 125–143. Mouton, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harrington, J.: The Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora. Wiley-Blackwell (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Reubold, U.: Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in Standard Southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 2825–2835 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Reubold, U.: The effect of prosodic weakening on the production and perception of trans-consonantal vowel coarticulation in German. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 551–561 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Reubold, U., Siddins, J.: The implications for sound change of prosodic weakening: evidence from polysyllabic shortening. J. Lab. Phonol. 6, 81–117 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hay, J., Jannedy, S., Mendoza-Denton, N.: Oprah and /ay/: lexical frequency, referee design and style. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hay, J., Foulkes, P.: The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heid, S., Hawkins, S.:. An acoustical study of long domain /r/ and /l/ coarticulation. In: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar on Speech Production: Models and Data, pp. 77–80. Kloster Seeon, Bavaria, Germany, Munich (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kataoka, R.: Phonetic and cognitive bases of sound change. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kawasaki, H.: Phonetic explanation for phonological universals: the case of distinctive vowel nasalization. In: Ohala, J., Jaeger, J. (eds.) Experimental Phonology, pp. 81–103. Academic Press, Orlando (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kiparsky, Paul: Universals constrain change; Change results in typological generalizations. In: Good, Jeff (ed.) Linguistic Universals and Language Change, pp. 23–53. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Kleber, F., Harrington, J., Reubold, U.: The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress. Lang. Speech 55, 383–405 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kleber, F., Peters, S.: Children’s imitation of coarticulatory patterns in different prosodic contexts. In: Proceedings of 14th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Tokyo, Japan (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Labov, W.: Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ladd, D.: Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Lightfoot, D.: The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Blackwell, Malden (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, S., Beddor, P., Coetzee, A.: Gestural reduction, lexical frequency, and sound change: a study of post-vocalic /l/. Lab. Phonol. 5, 9–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H & H theory. In: Hardcastle, W., Marchal, A. (eds.) Speech Production and Speech Modeling, pp. 403–439. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Lindblom, B.: Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure. In: Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Knight, C. (eds.) Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, pp. 242–264. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lindblom, B., Guion, S., Hura, S., Moon, S.-J., Willerman, R.: Is sound change adaptive? Rivista di Linguistica 7, 5–36 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lindblom B., MacNeilage, P.: Coarticulation: A universal phonetic phenomenon with roots in deep time. FONETIK 2011, 41–44 in TMH—QPSR, vol. 51, KTH Stockholm (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mann, V., Repp, B.: Influence of vocalic context on the perception of [\(\int \)]-[s] distinction: I. Temporal factors. Percep. Psychophys. 28, 213–228 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M.: The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. J. Speech Hear. Res. 30, 319–329 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ohala, J.: The listener as a source of sound change. In: Masek, C.S., Hendrick, R.A., Miller, M.F. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, pp. 178–203. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ohala, J.: The phonetics of sound change. In: Jones, C. (ed.) Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, pp. 237–278. Longman, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ohala: The listener as a source of sound change: an update. In: Solé, M.-J., Recasens, D. (eds.) The Initiation of Sound Change. Perception, Production, and Social factors, pp. 21–36. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ohala, J., Feder, D.: Listeners’ identification of speech sounds is influenced by adjacent “restored” phonemes. Phonetica 51, 111–118 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Öhman, S.E.: Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 151–168 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Phillips, B.: Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Pierrehumbert, J., Hirschberg, J.: The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: Cohen, P., Morgan, J., Pollack, M. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 271–311. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pierrehumbert, J.: Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In: Bybee, J., Hopper, P. (eds.) Frequency Effects and the Emergence of Lexical Structure, pp. 137–157. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Plichta, B.: AKUSTYK for Praat [Computer program] (2010). Accessed 12 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  57. Solé, M.: The perception of voice-initiating gestures. Lab. Phonol. 5, 37–68 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Srivastava, S., Gupta, M., Frigyik, B.: Bayesian quadratic discriminant analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 8, 1, 277–305 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Studdert-Kennedy, M.: Introduction: the emergence of phonology. In: Hurford, J., Studdert- Kennedy, M., Knight, C. (eds.) Approaches to the Evolution of Language, pp. 169–176. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vihman, M.: Sound change and child language. In: Traugott, E., La Brum, R., Shepherd, S. (eds.) Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, pp. 303–320. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  61. West, P.: Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties of English /l/ and /r/. J. Phonetics 27, 405–425 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wright, R.: Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In: Local, J., Ogden, R., Temple, R. (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, pp. 75–87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yu, A.: Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change. In: Yu, A. (ed.) Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization, pp. 201–227. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Yu, A., Abrego-Collier, C., Sonderegger, M.: Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: subjective attitude, personality, and ‘autistic’ traits. PLoS One 8(9), e74746 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zellou, G., Tamminga, M.: Nasal coarticulation changes over time in Philadelphia English. J. Phonetics 47, 18–35 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by European Research Council grant number 295573 ‘Sound change and the acquisition of speech’ (2012–2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Harrington .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Stevens, M. (2016). The Relationship Between the (Mis)-Parsing of Coarticulation in Perception and Sound Change: Evidence from Dissimilation and Language Acquisition. In: Esposito, A., et al. Recent Advances in Nonlinear Speech Processing. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28109-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28109-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28107-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28109-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics