Abstract
This chapter reviews the global context in which the IBSA Dialogue Forum was founded in 2003 and briefly outlines major debates going on in all three countries concerning the extent and content of the IBSA countries’ global engagement. This discussion leads to the basic argument of the present study: beyond the problem of ensuring common positions on specific issues, e.g. in global trade negotiations, IBSA has to grapple with the compatibility of the general strategies by which its members intend to insert themselves into a changing global order. The issue of alleged like-mindedness amongst IBSA member governments and societies emerges as a key understudied aspect of the initiative. This calls for a constructivist perspective which focusses on convergence and divergence among IBSA countries at the level of national discourses and the foreign policy role conceptions negotiated therein. The research focus of the study is defined in two main research questions: (a) How do India, Brazil and South Africa frame their role(s) in the international system, and (b) to what extent are the three framings compatible with the pursuit of the joint IBSA initiative?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“SA-Aca” indicates a South African academic interviewee, “B2010a” refers to a Brazilian official speech held in 2010, see list in the Annex. On the reference system for speeches and interviews see Sect. 3.4.
- 2.
In 2010 a ministerial meeting was held on the margins of the 65th UN General Assembly.
- 3.
Combining public and private actors in issue-specific initiatives of global relevance.
- 4.
In the Non-Aligned Movement, Brazil participates only as observer. South Africa is not a member of the G15.
References
Alden C, Vieira MA (2005) The new diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and trilateralism. Third World Q 26(7):1077–1095
Beri R (2008) IBSA dialogue forum: an assessment. Strateg Analysis 32(5):809–831
Buzan B, Lawson G (2014) Capitalism and the emergent world order. Int Aff 90(1):71–91
Chase R, Hill E, Kennedy P (1996) Pivotal states and U.S strategy. Foreign Aff 75(1):33–51
Chase R, Hill E, Kennedy P (1999) The pivotal states. A new framework for U.S. policy in the developing world. W. W. Norton, New York
Cooper AF, English J (2004) Reforming from the top: a leaders’ 20 summit. United Nations University Press, New York
Costa Vaz A (ed) (2006) Intermediate states, regional leadership and security: India, Brazil and South Africa. Editora UnB, Brasilia
Dieter H (2003) The World Trade Organisation after Cancún. Can the South hold onto its new power?, SWP Comments 2003/C 16. http://www.swpberlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/swpcomment2003_16_dtr.pdf
de la Fontaine D (2013) Neue Dynamiken in der Süd-Süd-Kooperation: Indien, Brasilien und Südafrika als Emerging Donors. Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Flemes D (2007) Emerging middle powers’ soft balancing strategy: state and perspectives of the IBSA dialogue forum. GIGA working papers, Nr. 57. http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp57_flemes.pdf
Flemes D (2009) India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the new global order. Interests, strategies and values of the emerging coalition. Int Stud 46(4):401–421
Flemes D (ed) (2010) Regional leadership in the global system. Ideas, interests and strategies of regional powers. Ashgate, Farnham
Flemes D (2013) Network powers: strategies of change in the multipolar system. Third World Q 34(6): 1016-1036
Gill S (1995) Globalisation, market globalisation and disciplinary neo-liberalism. Millennium. J Int Stud 24(3):399–423
Haas PM, Haas EB (1995) Learning to learn: improving international governance. Global Gov 1(3):255–285
Hirst M (2008) Brazil-India relations: a reciprocal learning process. South Asian Surv 15(1):143–164
Hoge JF (2004) A global power shift in the making: is the United States ready? Foreign Aff 83(4):2–7
Hurrell A (2006) Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? Int Aff 82(1):1–19
Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) (2009) Neue Führungsmächte als Partner deutscher Außenpolitik. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) (2010) Europe and new leading powers. Towards partnership in strategic policy areas. Nomos, Baden-Baden
IBSA (2003) Brasilia declaration. http://www.ibsa-trilateral.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102&Itemid=46. Accessed 08 Dec 2010
Khanna P (2008) The second world: empires and influence in the global order. Random House, New York
Kupchan CA (2012) No one’s world: the west, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford University Press, New York
Le Pere G, Leininger J, Riestra M, Fues T (2010) The Heiligendamm and emerging powers: more of the same or a genuine global governance innovation? In: Kumar A, Messner D (eds) Power shifts and global governance: challenges from South and North. Anthem Press, London, pp 321–342
Mahbubani K (2009) The new Asian hemisphere: the irresistible shift of global power to the east. Public Affairs, New York
Mair S, Dierks H (2010) Promotion of democracy and human rights. In: Husar J, Maihold G, Mair S (eds) Europe and new leading powers. Towards partnership in strategic policy areas. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 87–99
Manning R (2006) Will ‘emerging donors’ change the face of international co-operation? Dev Policy Rev 24(4):371–385
Nafey A (2005) IBSA Forum: the rise of a ‘new’ non-alignment. India Quarterly 61(1):1–78
Postel-Vinay K (2013) The G20: a new geopolitical order. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
RIS (2008) Trinity of the South. Potential of the India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) partnership. Academic Foundation, New Delhi
Rowlands D (2008) Emerging donors in international development assistance: a synthesis report. International Development Research Centre (IDRC). http://publicwebsite.idrc.ca/EN/Documents/ donors-international-development-synthesis-report.pdf. Accessed 06 Sept 2011
Schneckener U (2009) The opportunities and limits of global governance by clubs. SWP Comments 2009/C22, Sept 2009
Sjöstedt G (1977) The external role of the European community. Saxon House, Farnborough
Soederberg S (2006) Global governance in question: empire, class, and the new common sense in managing North–South relations. Pluto Press, London/Ann Arbor
Soko M (2007) Neues Gewicht im globalen Spiel? Afrika Süd 1(2007):30–32
Stamm A (2004) Schwellen- und Ankerländer als Akteure einer globalen Partnerschaft – Überlegungen zu einer Positionsbestimmung aus deutscher entwicklungspolitischer Sicht. http://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/1-2004.pdf
Stuenkel O (2015) India-Brazil-South Africa dialogue forum (IBSA). The rise of the global south. Routledge, Abingdon/New York
Stuenkel O, Jacob JT (2010) Rising powers and the future of democracy promotion: the case of Brazil and India. Port J Int Aff 2(4):23–30
Tokatlian J (ed) (2007) India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales. Libros del Zorzal, Buenos Aires
UN (1974) Declaration on the establishment of a new international economic order, A/RES/S-6/3201. http://www.un-documents.net/s6r3201.htm. Accessed 06 Sept 2011
Villares F (ed) (2006) India, Brazil and South Africa. Perspectives and alliances. Editora UNESP, Sao Paulo
Wilson D, Purushothaman R (2003) Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050. Goldman Sachs Global economics paper no 99. http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/global-growth/99-dreaming.pdf. Zugriff am 22 Jan 2008
Zakaria F (2008) The post-American world. W. W. Norton, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Husar, J. (2016). Introduction. In: Framing Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28715-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28715-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28714-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28715-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)