Skip to main content

What Do Parties Want? Parties’ Positions and Issue Emphasis on Tuition Fees and Subsidies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance

Abstract

This chapter analyzes party positions on higher education policies, particularly tuition fees and subsidies. The literature thus far has largely neglected to study party positions on (higher) education empirically, mainly due to a lack of comparative data. Against this background, I exploit expert survey data on party preferences towards higher education across Europe (Rohrschneider and Whitefield. The strain of representation: How parties represent diverse voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) as well as a dataset on party positions in Great Britain over 40 years utilizing party manifestos. The chapter finds, firstly, that parties do hold distinct positions on and do care about higher education finance. Secondly, parties’ higher education policy positions vary by ideology as expected by the Time-Sensitive Partisan Theory. Thirdly, confirming this theory, positive feedback-effects alter party positions on higher education finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ansell, B. W. (2008). University challenges: Explaining institutional change in higher education. World Politics, 60(2), 189–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, B. W. (2010). From the ballot to the blackboard: The redistributive political economy of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C. (1997). Political parties and the supply side of the economy: The provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–90. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 814–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality: Conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (2000). Expert judgements of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research. European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (2001). Theory and measurement of party policy positions. In I. Budge, H.-D. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara, & E. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mapping policy preferences. Estimates for parties, electors, and governments, 1945–1998 (pp. 75–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty three democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2007). The determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 582–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2009). Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2015). Skills and inequality: Partisan politics and the political economy of education reforms in western welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R., Franzmann, S. T., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2013). Who owns education? Cleavage structures in the partisan competition over educational expansion. West European Politics, 36(3), 521–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M. (2011). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Convergence towards a common model? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopædia Britannica. (2015). “Liberalism.” Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2015. Web. 02 November 2015 <http://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina, E., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011). Welfare regime debate: Past, present, futures? Policy and Politics, 39(4), 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, C. (2012). Nationale Hochschulpolitik im Europäischen Hochschulraum. Studiengebühren und Hochschulgovernance in Deutschland, England und Österreich. Baden Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmann, S. T. (2011). Liberale Parteien zwischen linkem und rechtem Lager. In S. S. Schüttemeyer (Ed.), DVPW-Kongressband 2009: Politik im Klimawandel (pp. 287–320). Baden Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmann, S. T. (2012). Die liberalen Parteifamilieni. In U. Jun (Ed.), Parteienfamilien - Identitätsbestimmend oder nur noch Etikett? Babara Budrich: Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, J. L. (2014). The political economy of higher education finance. A comparative analysis of the politics of tuition fees and subsidies. Dissertation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, Julian L. and Kilian Seng (2016) Party politics and education spending. Challenging some common wisdom. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(4): 510-53010.1080/13501763.2015.1048703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, J. L., & Seng, K. (2016). Party politics and education spending. Challenging some common wisdom. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(4), 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünewald, A., Garritzmann, J. L., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2015). Party politics and education in Great Britain (under review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, A. (2007). Political ideologies: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4), 600–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, A. P. (2011). Political parties and the institutionalization of education: A comparative analysis of party manifestos. Comparative Education Review, 55(2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. (2011). Capitalist systems, deindustrialization, and the politics of public education. Comparative Political Studies, 44(4), 412–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungblut, J. (2015). Bringing political parties into the picture: A two-dimensional analytical framework for higher education policy. Higher Education, 69(5), 867–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, E. J. (1988). Liberal parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2001). Searching for the position of political actors: A review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. In M. Laver (Ed.), Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. B. (1976). A theory of party competition. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2012). The strain of representation: How parties represent diverse voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (2002). Warum Mittelmaß? Deutschlands Bildungsausgaben im internationalen Vergleich. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 43(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (2007). Testing the retrenchment hypothesis: Education spending, 1960–2002. In F. G. Castles (Ed.), The disappearing state? Retrenchment realities in an age of globalisation (pp. 159–183). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Beyme, K. (2002). Politische Theorien im Zeitalter der Ideologien, 1789–1945. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garritzmann, J.L. (2016). What Do Parties Want? Parties’ Positions and Issue Emphasis on Tuition Fees and Subsidies. In: The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29913-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29913-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29912-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29913-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics