Abstract
The optimization of operating times and operation modes of devices and systems that consume or generate electricity in buildings by building energy management systems promises to alleviate problems arising in today’s electricity grids. Conflicting objectives may have to be pursued in this context, giving rise to a multi-objective optimization problem. This paper presents the optimization of appliances as well as heating and air-conditioning devices in two distinct settings of smart buildings, a residential and a commercial building, with respect to the minimization of energy costs, CO2 emissions, discomfort, and technical wearout. We propose new encodings for appliances that are based on a combined categorization of devices respecting both, the optimization of operating times as well as operation modes, e.g., of hybrid devices. To identify an evolutionary algorithm that promises to lead to good optimization results of the devices in our real-world lab environments, we compare four state-of-the-art algorithms in realistic simulations: ESPEA, NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and SPEA2. The results show that ESPEA and NSGA-II significantly outperform the other two algorithms in our scenario.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A complete description of this model goes beyond the scope of this paper, but is available on request.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
References
Gottwalt, S., Ketter, W., Block, C., Collins, J., Weinhardt, C.: Demand side management - a simulation of household behavior under variable prices. Energy Policy 39(12), 8163–8174 (2011)
Palensky, P., Dietrich, D.: Demand side management: demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 7(3), 381–388 (2011)
Braun, M.A., Shukla, P.K., Schmeck, H.: Obtaining optimal pareto front approximations using scalarized preference information. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2015, pp. 631–638. ACM, New York (2015)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland (2001)
Kok, J.K., Warmer, C.J., Kamphuis, I.G.: PowerMatcher: multiagent control in the electricity infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2005, pp. 75–82. ACM, New York (2005)
Ha, D.L., Joumaa, H., Ploix, S., Jacomino, M.: An optimal approach for electrical management problem in dwellings. Energy Build. 45, 1–14 (2012)
Nestle, D., Bendel, C., Ringelstein, J.: Bidirectional energy management interface (BEMI)-integration of the low voltage level into grid communication and control. In: 19th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, pp. 21–24, Vienna (2007)
Soares, A., Gomes, Á., Antunes, C.H.: Integrated management of residential energy resources. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 33 (2012)
Mauser, I., Müller, J., Allerding, F., Schmeck, H.: Adaptive building energy management with multiple commodities and flexible evolutionary optimization. Renewable Energy 87(Part 2), 911–921 (2016)
Ahmadi, P., Rosen, M.A., Dincer, I.: Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm. Energy 46(1), 21–31 (2012)
Allerding, F., Premm, M., Shukla, P.K., Schmeck, H.: Electrical load management in smart homes using evolutionary algorithms. In: Hao, J.-K., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoCOP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7245, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Soares, A., Antunes, C.H., Oliveira, C., Gomes, Á.: A multi-objective genetic approach to domestic load scheduling in an energy management system. Energy 77, 144–152 (2014)
Zhao, Z., Lee, W.C., Shin, Y., Song, K.B.: An optimal power scheduling method for demand response in home energy management system. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(3), 1391–1400 (2013)
Anvari-Moghaddam, A., Seifi, A., Niknam, T., Pahlavani, M.R.A.: Multi-objective operation management of a renewable MG (micro-grid) with back-up micro-turbine/fuel cell/battery hybrid power source. Energy 36(11), 6490–6507 (2011)
Pedrasa, M., Spooner, T., MacGill, I.: Coordinated scheduling of residential distributed energy resources to optimize smart home energy services. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(2), 134–143 (2010)
De Oliveira, G., Jacomino, M., Ploix, S.: Optimal power control for smart homes. In: IFAC World Congréss, Milan, Italy, pp. 9579–9586 (2011)
Salinas, S., Li, M., Li, P.: Multi-objective optimal energy consumption scheduling in smart grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(1), 341–348 (2013)
Mauser, I., Dorscheid, M., Allerding, F., Schmeck, H.: Encodings for Evolutionary Algorithms in smart buildings with energy management systems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 2361–2366. IEEE (2014)
Durillo, J.J., Nebro, A.J.: The jMetal framework for multi-objective optimization: design and architecture. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42(10), 760–771 (2011)
Dallinger, D.: The contribution of vehicle-to-grid to balance fluctuating generation: comparing different battery ageing approaches. Technical report, Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation (2013)
Reinhart, C.F., Herkel, S.: The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions a state-of-the-art comparison of six RADIANCE-based methods. Energy Build. 32(2), 167–187 (2000)
Graditi, G., Di Silvestre, M., Gallea, R., Sanseverino, E.R.: Heuristic-based shiftable loads optimal management in smart micro-grids. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 11(1), 271–280 (2015)
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(4), 257–271 (1999)
Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Evolutionary computation and convergence to a Pareto front. In: Late Breaking Papers at the Genetic Programming 1998 Conference, pp. 221–228. Citeseer (1998)
Kukkonen, S., Deb, K.: Improved pruning of non-dominated solutions based on crowding distance for bi-objective optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1179–1186. IEEE Press (2006)
Shukla, P.K., Braun, M.A., Schmeck, H.: Theory and algorithms for finding knees. In: Purshouse, R.C., Fleming, P.J., Fonseca, C.M., Greco, S., Shaw, J. (eds.) EMO 2013. LNCS, vol. 7811, pp. 156–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Braun, M., Dengiz, T., Mauser, I., Schmeck, H. (2016). Comparison of Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization in Smart Building Scenarios. In: Squillero, G., Burelli, P. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31203-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31204-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)