Skip to main content

Hearing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychology of Perception
  • 223k Accesses

Abstract

While Chap. 2 was focused on the physical and biological aspects of hearing, Chap. 3 is closer to real-life experience related to audition. The reader is first introduced to the notion of streaming for understanding the formation of an auditory object. The auditory stream is based on the relationships that one perceives between successive sounds. The sounds are grouped according to the proximity of their frequencies and how close in time they are, and this causes impressions that there is continuity, or that there are gaps, between sounds. The chapter also reveals how it is possible to localize sounds in space, either the distance of a sound source or the direction a sound is coming from. As well, the question as to why certain sounds result in an impression of music is addressed. Finally, the basic sounds of language, phonemes, are reviewed, and the technical aspects related to production of speech sounds are briefly described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is possible to get interesting demonstrations of different acoustical effects, for instance:

    Bregman, A. S., & Ahad, P. A. (1996). Demonstrations of auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound [CD]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Moreover, it is possible to access these demonstrations on different web sites. We recommend:

    Nakajima, Y. (2000). Demonstrations of auditory illusions and tricks (2nd ed.) [http://www.design.kyushuu.ac.jp/~ynhome/ENG/Demo/illusions2nd.html].

  2. 2.

    The reader is invited to discover several acoustical illusions or auditory paradoxes on Diana Deutsch’s web site: [http://deutsch.ucsd.edu/psychology/pages.php?i=201#Introduction.php].

  3. 3.

    This term comes from a Scottish ballad, “The Bonnie Earl O’Moray”, where “And laid him on the green” might well sound like “And Lady Mondegreen.”

References

  • Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis (The perceptual organization of sound). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungart, D. S., Durlach, N. I., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (1999). Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1956–1968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. A., Levy, E. T., & Neff, W. D. (1980). Apparent distance of sounds recorded in echoic and anechoic chambers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 745–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (2010, July). The paradox of pitch circularity. Acoustics Today, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S., & Killeen, P. R. (2009). Tracking time with song and count: Different Weber functions for musicians and non-musicians. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1649–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S., & Laforest, M. (2004). Discriminating slow tempo variations in a musical context. Acoustical Science & Technology, 25, 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honegger, M. (Ed.). (1976). Science de la musique (Vol. 1–2). Paris: Bordas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesse, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2010). Seeing a singer helps comprehension of the song’s lyrics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluender, K. L., Diehl, R. L., & Killeen, P. R. (1987). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, T., Nakajima, Y., Tsunashima, S., & Yasutake, T. (2009). Effects of spectra and sound pressure levels on the occurrence of the gap transfer illusion. Perception, 38, 411–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, E., Iyer, N., Lansing, C. R., & Feng, A. S. (2008). On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 450–461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Le Petit Larousse illustré 2011 - Dictionary (2010), Paris: Larousse.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1947). The masking of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 44, 105–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musicant, A. D., & Butler, R. A. (1984). The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1195–1200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Y., Sasaki, T., Kanafuka, K., Miyamoto, A., Remijn, G., & ten Hoopen, G. (2000). Illusory recouplings of onsets and terminations of glide tone components. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1413–1425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, L. S., & Penrose, R. (1958). Impossible objects: A special type of visual illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 31–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, I., & Hyde, K. L. (2003). What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 362–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, T. (1980). Sound restoration and temporal localization of noise in speech and music sounds. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 39, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. S., & Alain, C. (2007). Toward a neurophysiology theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 780–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. F., Russo, R. A., & Livingstone, S. (2010). Facial expressions of pitch structure in music performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsunada, J., Lee, J. H., & Cohen, Y. E. (2011). Representation of speech categories in the primate auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 2634–2646.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, F. L., & Kistler, D. J. (1992). The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 648–1661.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grondin, S. (2016). Hearing. In: Psychology of Perception. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31791-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics