Skip to main content

Walking the Walk: Conducting Feminist Community-Based Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Feminist Perspectives on Building a Better Psychological Science of Gender

Abstract

This chapter describes how community-based research can be used to put the principles of feminist science into practice. It provides examples of feminist community-based research projects conducted with youth populations with the goal of promoting social change. Community-based research may encompass a number of specific approaches (such as participatory action research), but in general it emphasizes collaborative work with community members, often giving a platform for the voices of disenfranchised groups. This chapter delineates how collaborative relationships are built by attending to the balance of power between researchers and participants, while recognizing that the degree of collaboration may vary depending upon the needs and interests of the community. The chapter also explores the importance of researchers engaging in reflexivity to increase their awareness of the ways their own values will impact the research process. Finally, ethical considerations when conducting feminist community-based research are explored and best practices are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brinkman, B. G. (2012). More PAR please! Why schools and universities should be doing more programming to reduce prejudice. In D. Russell & C. Russell (Eds.), The Psychology of Prejudice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Contemporary Issues (pp. 203–218). New York, NY: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, B. G. (2015). Detection and prevention of identity-based bullying: Social justice perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, B.G., Jedinak, A., Rosén, L. A., & Zimmerman, T.S. (2010) Teaching children fairness: Decreasing gender prejudice amongst 5th graders. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10,

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, B. G., Khan, A., Jedinak, A., & Vetere, L. (2015). College women’s reflections on media representations of empowerment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4, 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, B.G. & Manning, L. (2015). Children’s intended responses to gender-based bullying as targets and bystanders, Childhood (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. N. (2006). Mentoring on the Borderlands: Creating empowering connections between adolescent girls and young women volunteers. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of the Self-Knowledge, 4, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterwick, S. (2011). Travels with feminist community-based research: Reflections on location, class relations and negotiating reciprocity. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.), Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies (pp. 58–74). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2007). What’s good writing in feminist research? What can feminist researchers learn about good writing? In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 443–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, G. & Frisby, W. (2011) Reflections: Promise and limits of feminist community research. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.). Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies (pp. 232–236). Vancouver: UBC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research: A social justice perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology., 5, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70–82). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, W. & Creese, G. (2011) Unpacking relationships in feminist community based research: Crosscutting themes. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds). Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies (pp. 1-15). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., Mediratta, K., Ruglis, J., Stoudt, B., Shah, S., & Fine, M. (2010). Critical youth engagement: Participatory action research and organizing. In L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Puta, & C. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy on civic engagement with youth (pp. 621–650). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2005). The action research dissertation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). Feminist research: Exploring the interconnections of epistemology, methodology, and method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., Bond, M. A., Mulvey, A., & Terenzio, M. (2000). Methodological issues and challenges for a feminist community psychology: An introduction to a special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 759–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, S. A., & Kral, M. J. (2005). Practicing participatory action research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B., & Coquillon, E. (2007). Participatory and action research and feminisms: Toward transformative praxis. In I. S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 297–326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In P. Reason & H Bradbury (Eds.) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. (59-69). Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. A. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsom, J.S. (Producer and Director). (2011). Miss representation [Motion Picture]. United States: Ro*Co Films International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S.E. & Brennan, M. (2004). Doormats and feminists: Who is the “community” in action research? In M. Brydon-Miller, P. Maguire, & A. McIntyre. (Eds.) Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research (pp. 97–13). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & L. S. Yvonna (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, C., Poic, P., Hara, C., Ledrew, R., Kaweesi, C., & Besla, K. (2011). Living an ethical agreement: Negotiating confidentiality and harm in feminist participatory action research. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.), Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roof, J. (2007). Authority and representation in feminist research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 425–442). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. L. (1997). Constructivist thinking within the history of ideas: The challenge of a new paradigm. In T. L. Sexton & B. L. Griffin (Eds.), Constructivist thinking in counseling practice, research, and training (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, J., & Bhattacharjee, A. (1999). Expanding the classroom: Fostering active learning and activism. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 27, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Bratini, L., Chambers, D. A., Jensen, R. V., & Romero, L. (2010). Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research, 8, 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R., & Hartmann, H. (1996). Small happinesses: The feminist struggle to integrate social research with social activism. In H. Gottfired (Ed.), Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 206–224). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. (2001). Women as subjects, actors, and agents in the history of psychology. In R. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 3–16). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, T. S., Aberle, J. M., & Krafchick, J. (2006). FAIR: A diversity and social justice curriculum for school counselors to integrate school-wide. Guidance & Counselling, 21, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britney G. Brinkman Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brinkman, B.G. (2016). Walking the Walk: Conducting Feminist Community-Based Research. In: Roberts, TA., Curtin, N., Duncan, L., Cortina, L. (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Building a Better Psychological Science of Gender. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32141-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics