Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Transnational Political Effects of Diasporic Citizenship in Countries of Destination: Overseas Citizenship of India and Political Participation in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diaspora as Cultures of Cooperation

Part of the book series: Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship ((MDC))

Abstract

The chapter provides an empirically grounded theory of how citizenship policies in migrants’ country of origin influence immigrants’ political activities, ethnic interest groups, and ethnic lobbying. Based on the study of India’s citizenship-like diaspora membership status, the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI), this chapter shows that the existence of OCI and the status passages toward OCI affect the political influence of the Indian-American community, as well as the political activities by community actors, especially the degree of community organisation, number of voters and individuals working for political parties, community involvement, and financial contributions. The citizenship-like status accomplishes these effects by increasing naturalisation of ethnic Indians in the USA, by affecting categories of identification with India, as well as by fostering the good-will of individuals and community organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Or 53 and 19 percent respectively, see United Nations (2013). According to Vink et al.’s (2013) global dual citizenship database, in 2013, 70 percent of all countries allowed dual citizenship once their nationals naturalised elsewhere.

  2. 2.

    Itzigsohn and Saucedo (2002), Levitt (2003), Portes et al. (2008), Spiro (2006), Lafleur (2012), Koinova (2013), and Burgess (2014).

  3. 3.

    Guarnizo et al. (2003), Levitt and Jaworsky (2007).

  4. 4.

    Shain and Barth (2003), Varadarajan (2010), and Ragazzi et al. (2012).

  5. 5.

    Calvo and Rosenstone (1989), Shain (1994/95), R. Smith (1995), Haney and Vanderbush (1999), De la Garza and Pachon (2000), T. Smith (2000), Ambrosio (2002), Lindsay (2002), Mearsheimer and Walt (2007), Rubenzer (2008), Baumgartner et al. (2009), Lieberman (2009), Paul and Paul (2009), and DeWind and Segura (2014).

  6. 6.

    Diasporic actors are all persons who originate from a certain country, self-identify with that country, and who maintain a meaningful cultural and social relationship with the country (Sheffer 2003; Naujoks 2013a: 12). This includes both citizens and non-citizens of the home country, as well as first and second-plus generation emigrants.

  7. 7.

    For an overview, see Haglund (2015) and note 5.

  8. 8.

    On the latter, see Gamlen (2014).

  9. 9.

    Another, slightly more limited membership status was the Person of Indian Origin card (PIO card), which was available from 1999 until January 2015. For more details on the privileges and limitations of OCI and the PIO card, see Naujoks (2013a: Chaps. 1, 3), Xavier (2011).

  10. 10.

    For more details, see Naujoks (2013a: Introduction and Annex).

  11. 11.

    This refers to people who self-identify as ‘Asian Indians alone’ in the American Community Survey. In 2014, 300,000 more people identified as ‘Asian Indians’ and another ethnic group, which can be explained by children of mixed marriages or by ethnic Indians, who were born in Suriname, Uganda, and other places where their ancestors had emigrated from India.

  12. 12.

    The Indian diaspora in the USA is highly organised, with countless regional and pan-Indian cultural, professional, and charity organisations. A mapping of Indian-American community organisations revealed 346 associations, of which the larger ones had dozens of chapters across the USA, sometimes even in India (Naujoks 2013a, Chap. 1). For an analysis of transnational organisations among Indian immigrants in the USA, see Agarwala (2015).

  13. 13.

    Parekh (2000) provides examples and numbers for Indian-American political fundraising.

  14. 14.

    These bills ban State contract work from being shifted outside the USA, and limit the use of offshore call centres; these affect less than 2 percent of the total IT work that is outsourced to Indian companies from the USA (NFAP 2007).

  15. 15.

    As reported by The Hindu Businessline, 13 May 2005.

  16. 16.

    This review draws on references listed in note 5. Focusing on factors with regard to ethnic interest groups, I disregard contextual factors affecting the political influence, such as convergence of policy goals with the government or the general public (‘push an open door’).

  17. 17.

    Calvo and Rosenstone (1989) point to other factors with regard to political participation that affect a community’s political influence, such as community members’ attendance of public meetings and political rallies, attempts to influence voting behaviour of others, as well as non-electoral activities, such as writing to a congressman and signing a petition.

  18. 18.

    For other studies, see Jones-Correa 2001; Woodrow-Lafield et al. 2004; Mazzolari 2009; Thränhardt 2008; Faist and Gerdes 2008.

  19. 19.

    In Naujoks (2012), I have analysed three distinct rates based on different data sets, namely: (1) annual admissions of legal permanent residents and naturalisations seven years later; (2) naturalisations of the resident population eligible for naturalisation; and (3) naturalisation of specific immigrant cohorts. In order to isolate effects specific to the country of origin from general factors in the USA, I juxtaposed the development of naturalisation rates for Indian, or India-born, immigrants with the respective rates for all Asian immigrants and for all immigrants as comparison groups.

  20. 20.

    Although other factors related to India or to the Indian-American community—such as India’s economic development, the changing rhetoric toward the diaspora, and political aspirations of the community—might have contributed to the increase in the naturalisation rate, the observed increase is likely to be influenced predominantly by the availability of OCI, and before that, by the availability of the PIO card.

  21. 21.

    Based on panel data from Germany, Street (2015) confirms that naturalisation can promote political integration, especially if new citizens can pick up habits of political engagement during the formative years of early adulthood.

  22. 22.

    Singh (2012) examines Indian ethnic lobbying in Canada.

  23. 23.

    For a discussion on OCI as a citizenship status, see Naujoks (2013b).

References

  • Agarwala, Rina. 2015. Tapping the Indian Diaspora for Indian Development. In The State and the Grassroots: Immigrant Transnational Organisations in Four Continents, eds. Alejandro Portes, and Patricia Fernandez-Kelly, 84–110. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, Thomas. 2002. Ethnic Identity Groups and U.S. Foreign Policy. In Ethnic Identity Groups and U.S. Foreign Policy, ed. Thomas Ambrosi, 1–21. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, Richard D., Kay Deaux, and Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe. 2004. An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin 130: 80–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, Rainer. 2003. Towards a Political Theory of Migrant Transnationalism. International Migration Review 37(3): 700–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: the Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, Ami. 2014. Crowley, Roskam Announce New India Caucus Co-chairs Bera, Holding. Press Release from December 11, 2014. http://www.webcitation.org/6dpbmfMgz

  • Bratsberg, Bernt, James F. Ragan Jr., and Zafar M. Nasir. 2002. The Effect of Naturalization on Wage Growth – A Panel Study of Young Male Immigrants. Journal of Labour Economics 20(3): 568–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Katrina. 2014. Unpacking the Diaspora Channel in New Democracies: When Do Migrants Act Politically Back Home? Studies in Comparative International Development 49: 13–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Standard. 1997. Indo-US Extradition Treaty Ratification May Be Delayed. June 24, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, Maria Antonia, and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1989. Hispanic Political Participation. San Antonio, TX: Southwest Voter Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornyn, John. n.d. Senate India Caucus. Senator John Cornyn Website. Accessed December 15, 2015. http://www.webcitation.org/6dpcooQKz

  • Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Garza, Rodolfo O., and Harry F. Pachon. 2000. Latinos and U.S. Foreign Policy: Representing the “Homeland”? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWind, Josh, and Renata Segura. 2014. Diaspora-Government Relations in Forging US Foreign Policies. In Diaspora Lobbies and the US Government Convergence and Divergence in Making Foreign Policy, eds. Josh DeWind, and Renata Segura, 3–28. New York: NYU Press and Social Science Research Council.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Embassy of India, Washington, D.C. 2011. Senate India Caucus welcomes Ambassador Nirupama Rao. India Review 7(12). www.webcitation.org/66x64guag

  • Faist, Thomas, and Jürgen Gerdes. 2008. Dual Citizenship in an Age of Mobility. Migration Policy Institute: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, David. 2006. Rethinking Emigrant Citizenship. New York University Law Review 81(1): 90–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamlen, Alan. 2014. Diaspora Institutions and Diaspora Governance. International Migration Review 48(1 Suppl.): S180–S217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnizo, Luis Eduardo, Alejandro Portes, and William Haller. 2003. Assimilation and Transnationalism: Determinants of Transnational Political Action among Contemporary Migrants. The American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 1211–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, David G. 2015. Ethnic Diasporas and US Foreign Policy. Oxford Bibliographies Online. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailbronner, Kay. 2003. Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals: Changing Concepts and Attitudes. In Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals – Evolution and Prospects, eds. David A. Martin, and Kay Hailbronner, 19–26. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, Patrick J., and Walt Vanderbush. 1999. The Role of Ethnic Interest Groups in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of the Cuban American National Foundation. International Studies Quarterly 43: 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, Aziz. 2001. McDermott Assails India Caucus. Rediff.com , September 3, 2001. www.webcitation.org/6dqjipSpr.

  • Hathaway, Robert M. 2001. Unfinished Passage: India, Indian Americans, and the U.S. Congress. The Washington Quarterly 24(2): 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High-level Committee on the Indian Diaspora. 2002. Report on the Indian Diaspora. New Delhi: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian American Friendship Council (IAFC). 2004. Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans. www.webcitation.org/66yONhxV2

  • Itzigsohn, José, and Silvia Giorguli Saucedo. 2002. Immigrant Incorporation and Sociocultural Transnationalism. International Migration Review 36(3): 766–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janardhanan, Vinod. 2013. Political Participation of the Indian Diaspora in the USA. Journal of International and Global Studies 5(1): 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Correa, Michael. 2001. Under two Flags: Dual Nationality in Latin America and its Consequences for Naturalization in the United States. International Migration Review 35(4): 997–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, Devesh. 2010. Diasporas, Development and Democracy. The Domestic Impact of International Migration from India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, Jason A. 2008. Indian-Americans and the U.S.–India Nuclear Agreement: Consolidation of an Ethnic Lobby? Foreign Policy Analysis 4: 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koinova, Maria. 2013. Four Types of Diaspora Mobilisation: Albanian Diaspora Activism for Kosovo Independence in the US and the UK. Foreign Policy Analysis 9(4): 433–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur, Jean-Michel. 2012. Transnational Politics and the State: The External Voting Rights of Diasporas. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Peggy. 2003. Keeping Feet in Both Worlds: Transnational Practices and Immigrant Incorporation in the United States. In Towards Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, eds. Christin Joppke, and Ewa Morawska, 177–194. Houndsmill and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Peggy, and B. Nadya Jaworsky. 2007. Transnational Migration Studies: Past Developments and Future Trends. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Robert C. 2009. The ‘Israel Lobby’ and American Politics. Perspectives on Politics 7: 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, James M. 2002. Getting Uncle Sam’s Ear: Will Ethnic Lobbies Cramp America’s Foreign Policy Style? Brookings Review 20(1): 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzolari, Francesca. 2009. Dual Citizenship Rights: Do they make More and Richer Citizens? Demography 46(1): 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. 2007. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, Dinshaw. 2013–2014. The India Lobby and the Nuclear Agreement with India. Political Science Quarterly 128(4): 717–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The US–India Nuclear Agreement: Diplomacy and Domestic Politics. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naujoks, Daniel. 2010a. India and Its Diaspora. Changing Research and Policy Paradigms. In National Paradigms of Migration Research, eds. Dietrich Thränhardt, and Michael Bommes, 269–300. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. Diasporic Identities – Reflections on Transnational Belonging. Diaspora Studies 3(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Does Dual Citizenship Increase Naturalization? – Evidence from Indian Immigrants in the U.S. Research Paper 125, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Migration, Citizenship and Development. Diasporic Membership Policies and Overseas Indians in the United States. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Free Rider or Trailblazer? Atypical Citizenship and the Meaning of Membership. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association, August 29, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Securitization of Dual Citizenship. National Security Concerns and the Making of the Overseas Citizenship of India. Diaspora Studies 8(1): 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NFAP (National Foundation for American Policy). 2007. Anti-outsourcing Efforts Down but Not Out. Policy Brief, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, Neil. 2000. India Caucus: Goals for Next Two Years. News India-Times, December 15, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, David M., and Rachel Anderson Paul. 2009. Ethnic Lobbies and US Foreign Policy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, Jean S. 2004. Ethnic Identity: Developmental and Contextual Perspectives. www.nd.edu and www.webcitation.org/66snwbOjJ

  • Portes, Alejandro, and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro, Cristina Escobar, and Renelinda Arana. 2008. Divided or Convergent Loyalties? The Political Incorporation Process of Latin American Immigrants in the United States. Working Paper, Center for Migration and Development, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragazzi, Francesco, Latha Varadarajan, Maria Koinova, and Rahel Kunz. 2012. Contributions to the Forum: Diaspora Politics and IR: Do We Need to Rethink the Theory? International Political Sociology 6: 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenzer, Trevor. 2008. Ethnic Minority Interest Group Attributes and U.S. Foreign Policy Influence: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 4(2): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2003. Towards Post-National and Denationalized Citizenship. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, eds. Engin F. Isin, and Bryan S. Turner, 277–292. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, Peter H. 2002. Plural Citizenship. In Dual Nationality, Social Rights and Federal Citizenship in the U.S. and Europe, eds. Randall Hansen, and Patrick Weil, 61–99. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Kirk. 2006. The Economics of Citizenship: Is There a Naturalization Effect? Research on Immigration and Integration in the Metropolis. Working Paper Series No. 06-06. Vancouver Centre of Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shain, Yossi. 1994/95. Ethnic Diaspora and U.S. Foreign Policy. Political Science Quarterly 109(5): 811–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shain, Yossi, and Aharon Barth. 2003. Diasporas and International Relations Theory. International Organisation 57(3): 449–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffer, Gabriel. 2003. Diaspora Politics: At Home Abroad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Anita. 2012. The Diaspora Networks of Ethnic Lobbying in Canada. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 18(3): 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard A. 1995. Interest Group Influence in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 89–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Tony. 2000. Foreign Attachments: The Power of Ethnic Groups in the Making of American Foreign Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. The Limits of Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Peter J. 2006. Perfecting Political Diaspora. New York University Law Review 81(207): 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhardt, Max. 2008. Does Citizenship Matter? The Economic Impact of Naturalizations in Germany. Research Paper, 3–13, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research – Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, Alex. 2015. The Political Effects of Immigrant Naturalization. International Migration Review (early view), DOI: 10.1111/imre.12229.

  • Therwath, Ingrid. 2008. La diaspora indienne comme acteur international. In New Delhi et le monde. Une puissance émergente entre realpolitik et soft power, ed. Christophe Jaffrelot, 110–124. Paris: Autrement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thränhardt, Dietrich. 2008. Einbürgerung. Rahmenbedingungen, Motive und Perspektiven des Erwerbs der deutschen Staatsangehörigkeit. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2013. World Population Policies 2011. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, Latha. 2010. The Domestic Abroad: Diasporas in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vink, Martin, Gerard-René de Groot, and Chun Luk. 2013. Global Dual Citizenship Database. Updated until January 1, 2013 (version 1.00). Maastricht: Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Joe. 2012. India Caucus. Website of U.S. Congressman Joe Wilson. www.webcitation.org/66yPV4d51

  • Woodrow-Lafield, Karen A., Xiaohe Xu, Thomas Kersen, and Bunnak Poch. 2004. Naturalization of U.S. Immigrants: Highlights from Ten Countries. Population Research and Policy Review 23: 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier, Constantino. 2011. Experimenting with Diasporic Incorporation: The Overseas Citizenship of India. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 17: 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York, USA

    Daniel Naujoks

Authors
  1. Daniel Naujoks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Naujoks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Norman Paterson School, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    David Carment

  2. European Ethnology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

    Ariane Sadjed

Additional information

I thank Dietrich Thränhardt, Uwe Hunger, Stefan Rother, Nicola Piper, as well as the editors of this volume, Ariane Sadjed and David Carment, for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter. I also acknowledge valuable feedback from participants at the annual meetings of the Southwestern Political Science Association and German Political Science Association, as well as at the Workshop on Diaspora as Agents of Global Cooperation in April 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naujoks, D. (2017). The Transnational Political Effects of Diasporic Citizenship in Countries of Destination: Overseas Citizenship of India and Political Participation in the United States. In: Carment, D., Sadjed, A. (eds) Diaspora as Cultures of Cooperation. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32892-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32892-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32891-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32892-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation