Skip to main content

Uncovering Hidden Sentiment in Meetings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9673))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The sentiment expressed by a meeting participant in their face-to-face comments may differ from the sentiment contained in their private summary of the meeting. In this work, we investigate whether we can predict the sentiment score of a participant’s private post-meeting summary, based on multi-modal features derived from the group interaction during the meeting. We describe several effective prediction models, all of which outperform a baseline that assumes the sentiment score of the summary will be the same as the sentiment score of the participant’s comments during the meeting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms subjectivity and sentiment are very closely related, and we use the latter.

References

  1. Raaijmakers, S., Truong, K., Wilson, T.: Multimodal subjectivity analysis of multiparty conversation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2008, Honolulu, HI, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray, G., Carenini, G.: Subjectivity detection in spoken and written conversations. Nat. Lang. Eng. 17(03), 397–418 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Now Publishers, Vancouver (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Renals, S., Bourlard, H., Carletta, J., Popescu-Belis, A.: Multimodal Signal Processing: Human Interactions in Meetings, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray, G.: Analyzing productivity shifts in meetings. In: Barbosa, D., Milios, E. (eds.) Canadian AI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9091, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, B., Rudin, C.: Learning about meetings. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 28(5–6), 1134–1157 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rienks, R., Zhang, D., Gatica-Perez, D., Post, W.: Detection and application of influence rankings in small group meetings. In: Proceedings of ICMI 2006, Banff, Canada (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pentland, A., Heibeck, T.: Honest Signals. MIT press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jayagopi, D., Hung, H., Yeo, C., Gatica-Perez, D.: Modeling dominance in group conversations from non-verbal activity cues. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 17(3), 501–513 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. op den Akker, R.: Multi-modal analysis of small-group conversational dynamics. In: Renals, S., Bourlard, H., Carletta, J., Popescu-Belis, A. (eds.) Multimodal Signal Processing, pp. 155–169. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dong, W., Lepri, B., Pianesi, F., Pentland, A.: Modeling functional roles dynamics in small group interactions. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 15(1), 83–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frauendorfer, D., Mast, M.S., Sanchez-Cortes, D., Gatica-Perez, D.: Emergent power hierarchies and group performance. Int. J. Psychol. 50(5), 392–396 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, J.H., Shah, J.: Automatic prediction of consistency among team members’ understanding of group decisions in meetings. In: Proceedings of IEEE SMC, pp. 3702–3708 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 37(2), 267–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boucher, J., Osgood, C.: The pollyanna hypothesis. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8(1), 1–8 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, T.: Annotating subjective content in meetings. In: Proceedings of LREC, pp. 2738–2745 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carletta, J.: Unleashing the killer corpus: experiences in creating the multi-everything ami meeting corpus. In: Proceedings of LREC 2006, Genoa, Italy, pp. 181–190 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Murray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murray, G. (2016). Uncovering Hidden Sentiment in Meetings. In: Khoury, R., Drummond, C. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9673. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34111-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34111-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34110-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34111-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics