Skip to main content

A New Pathologic Assessment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: The Squamo-Oxyntic Gap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stem Cells, Pre-neoplasia, and Early Cancer of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Abstract

Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is delayed by the lack of uniform histopathologic criteria for diagnosis. The only practical value of pathology is the assessment of columnar lined esophagus (CLO). As a result, GORD is treated with acid suppressive drug therapy until there is a failure to control symptoms and/or advanced adenocarcinoma develops. The reasons why there is a failure of pathologic diagnosis are two false dogmas that result in two widely believed fundamental errors. These are the belief that cardiac epithelium normally lines the proximal stomach (1) and that the gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) is defined by the proximal limit of rugal folds (2). When these false dogmas are eradicated by existing powerful evidence, the pathology of GERD falls into the following stages, all defined by histology: (a) The normal state where the esophageal squamous epithelium transitions at the GOJ to gastric oxyntic epithelium with no intervening cardiac epithelium; (b) cardiac metaplasia of the squamous epithelium due to exposure to gastric juice results in cephalad movement of the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ). This creates the squamo-oxyntic gap and the dilated distal esophagus, which is distal to the endoscopic GOJ. The length of the squamo-oxyntic gap in the dilated distal esophagus is concordant with the shortening of the abdominal segment of the lower esophageal sphincter (LOS); (c) in the early stages, the gap is <5 mm and the LOS retains its competence. Reflux is uncommon and patients are asymptomatic; (d) the squamo-oxyntic gap increases in length, concordant with the amount of shortening of the LOS, which becomes increasingly incompetent. At a gap length of 5–15 mm, reflux is sufficient to cause symptoms, but in most patients, symptoms are controllable and the patients are normal at endoscopy. The gap is entirely within the dilated distal esophagus, which is mistaken by present criteria for proximal stomach. (e) The last stage of GORD is when the squamo-oxyntic gap is >15 mm. In these patients, reflux is severe with increasingly uncontrollable symptoms and columnar lined esophagus, both irreversible states.

Understanding this pathophysiology of GORD by these new histologic criteria will allow diagnosis at the earliest and eminently reversible stages of the disease. This can open the door to new methods of treatment that will have the potential to prevent progression to the irreversible phase of GORD, including columnar lined esophagus. If successful, this will effectively prevent progression to adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1383–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Goyal RK. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction. Lancet. 1994;344:1533–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malfertheiner P, Nocon M, Vieth M, Stolte M, Jasperson D, Keolz HR, Labenz J, Leodolter A, Lind T, Richter K, Willich SN. Evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years under routine medical care—the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:154–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pohl H, Sirovich B, Welch HG. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1468–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Allison PR. Peptic ulcer of the oesophagus. Thorax. 1948;3:20–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Morson BC, Belcher BR. Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and ectopic gastric mucosa. Br J Cancer. 1952;6:127–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Leodolter A, Nocon M, Vieth M, Lind T, Jasperson D, Richter K, Willich S, Stolte M, Malfertheiner P, Labenz J. Progression of specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia to macroscopically evident Barrett’s esophagus: an entity of concern in the Pro-GERD study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonavina L, Evander A, DeMeester TR, et al. Length of the distal esophageal sphincter and competency of the cardia. Am J Surg. 1986;151:25–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC. The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg. 1988;155:104–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stein HJ, Liebermann-Meffert D, DeMeester TR, Siewert JR. Three-dimensional pressure image and muscular structure of the human lower esophageal sphincter. Surgery. 1995;117:692–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrasoma P, Wijetunge S, Ma Y, DeMeester S, Hagen J, DeMeester T. The dilated distal esophagus: a new entity that is the pathologic basis of early gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1873–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrasoma P, Makarewicz K, Wickramasinghe K, Ma YL, DeMeester TR. A proposal for a new validated histologic definition of the gastroesophageal junction. Human Pathol. 2006;37:40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayazi S, Tamhankar A, DeMeester SR, et al. The impact of gastric distension on the lower esophageal sphincter and its exposure to acid gastric juice. Ann Surg. 2010;252:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson EV, Derakhshan MH, Wirz AA, Lee YY, Seenan JP, Ballantyne SA, Hanvey SL, Kelman AW, Going JJ, McColl KE. Central obesity in asymptomatic volunteers is associated with increased intrasphincteric acid reflux and lengthening of the cardiac mucosa. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:730–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke AT, Wirz AA, Manning JJ, Ballantyne SA, Alcorn DJ, McColl KE. Severe reflux disease is associated with an enlarged unbuffered proximal gastric acid pocket. Gut. 2008;57:292–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahrilas PJ, Shi G, Manka M, Joehl RJ. Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distension in reflux patients with hiatal hernia. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:688–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigo J, Hernandez CJ, Vidal MA, Pedrosa JA. Vegetative innervation of the esophagus. III. Intraepithelial endings. Acta Anat. 1975;92:242–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones B, The Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McClave SA, Boyce Jr HW, Gottfried MR. Early diagnosis of columnar lined esophagus: a new endoscopic diagnostic criterion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:413–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, Fennerty B, Sampliner R, Spechler S, Cameron A, Corley D, Falk G, Goldblum J, Hunter J, Jankowski J, Lundell L, Reid B, Shaheen N, Sonnenberg A, Wang K, Weinstein W. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:310–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chandrasoma PT. Histologic definition of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013;29:460–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paull A, Trier JS, Dalton MD, Camp RC, Loeb P, Goyal RK. The histologic spectrum of Barrett’s esophagus. N Eng J Med. 1976;295:476–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chandrasoma P. Controversies of the cardiac mucosa and Barrett’s esophagus. Histopathology. 2005;46:361–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chandrasoma P. Pathophysiology of Barrett’s esophagus. Semin Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;9:270–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chandrasoma PT, Wijetunge S, DeMeester SR, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR. The histologic squamo-oxyntic gap: an accurate and reproducible diagnostic marker of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:1574–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Ma Y, et al. Histology of the gastroesophageal junction: an autopsy study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarbia M, Donner A, Gabbert HE. Histopathology of the gastroesophageal junction. A study on 36 operation specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1207–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilgore SP, Ormsby AH, Gramlich TL, et al. The gastric cardia: fact or fiction? Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:921–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park YS, Park HJ, Kang GH, Kim CJ, Chi JG. Histology of gastroesophageal junction in fetal and pediatric autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:451–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glickman JN, Fox V, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Odze RD. Morphology of the cardia and significance of carditis in pediatric patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1032–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chandrasoma PT, Lokuhetty DM, DeMeester TR, et al. Definition of histopathologic changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:344–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Odze RD. Unraveling the mystery of the gastroesophageal junction: a pathologist’s perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1853–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Ma Y, Peters J, DeMeester T. Histologic classification of patients based on mapping biopsies of the gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:929–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Dalton P, Kobayashi G, Ma Y, Peters J, DeMeester T. Distribution and significance of epithelial types in columnar lined esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katz PO, Castell DO, Chen Y, Andersson T, Sostek MB. Intragastric acid suppression and pharmacokinetics of twice-daily esomeprazole: a randomized, three-way crossover study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:399–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Allison PR, Johnstone AS. The oesophagus lined with gastric mucous membrane. Thorax. 1953;8:87–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Barrett NR. Chronic peptic ulcer of the oesophagus and “oesophagitis”. Br J Surg. 1950;38:175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barrett NR. The lower esophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Surgery. 1957;41:881–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hayward J. The lower end of the oesophagus. Thorax. 1961;16:36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jain R, Aquino D, Harford WV, Lee E, Spechler SJ. Cardiac epithelium is found infrequently in the gastric cardia. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:A160.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Derakhshan MH, Robertson EV, Lee YY, Harvey T, Ferrier RK, Wirz AA, Orange C, Ballantyne SA, Hanvey SL, Going JJ, McColl KE. In healty volunteers, immunohistochemistry supports squamous to columnar metaplasia as mechanism of expansion of cardia, aggravated by central obesity. Gut. 2015;64(11):1705–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ringhofer C, Lenglinger J, Izay B, Kolarik K, Zacherl J, Fisler M, Wrba F, Chandrasoma PT, Cosentini EP, Prager G, Riegler M. Histopathology of the endoscopic esophagogastric junction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120:350–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg. 1997;226:522–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lembo T, Ippoliti AF, Ramers C, Weinstein WM. Inflammation of the gastroesophageal junction (carditis) in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease; a prospective study. Gut. 1999;45:484–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Johns BAE. Developmental changes in the oesophageal epithelium in man. J Anat. 1952;86:431–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parakrama Chandrasoma M.D., M.R.C.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chandrasoma, P., DeMeester, T. (2016). A New Pathologic Assessment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: The Squamo-Oxyntic Gap. In: Jansen, M., Wright, N. (eds) Stem Cells, Pre-neoplasia, and Early Cancer of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 908. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41388-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics