Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening outcomes are sustainable over consecutive years with significant reductions in recall and increasing cancers per recalled patients compared to screening with digital mammography alone (DM). There is a prevalence effect with a reduction in cancer detection at the second round of screening that is no longer present at the third round. There is a non-statistically significant trend of decreased interval cancers with DBT compared to DM alone screening. Early data on the implementation of synthetic 2D (s2D) imaging coupled with DBT shows maintenance of screening outcomes with reduction in radiation dose compared to DM/DBT screening .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Skaane, P., Bandos, A.I., Eben, E.B., Jebsen, I.N., Krager, M., Haakenaasen, U., Ekseth, U., Izadi, M., Hofvind, S., Gullien, R.: Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology 271(3), 655–663 (2014)
Ciatto, S., Houssami, N., Bernardi, D., Caumo, F., Pellegrini, M., Brunelli, S., Tuttobene, P., Bricolo, P., Fanto, C., Valentini, M., Montemezzi, S., Macaskill, P.: Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 14(7), 583–589 (2013)
Gilbert, F.J., Tucker, L., Gillan, M.G., et al.: The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS breast screening programme–a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol. Assess. 19(i–xxv), 1–136 (2015)
Friedewald, S.M., Rafferty, E.A., Conant, E.F.: Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography-reply. JAMA 312, 1695–1696 (2014)
McCarthy, A.M., Kontos, D., Synnestvedt, M. et al.: Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 106, 1–7 (2014)
Rose, S.L., Tidwell, A.L., Bujnoch, L.J., et al.: Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 200, 1401–1408 (2013)
Haas, B.M., Kalra, V., Geisel, J., et al.: Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 269, 694–700 (2013)
McDonald, E.S., Oustimov, A., Weinstein, S.P., Synnestvedt, M., Schnall, M., Conant, E.C.: Effectiveness of tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography: outcomes analysis from three years of breast cancer screening. JAMA Oncol. (2016, in press)
Zuckerman, S.P., Conant, E.F., Weinstein, S.P., Synnestvedt, M., Korhonen, K.E., McDonald, E.S.: Early implementation of synthesized 2D in screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: a pictorial essay of early outcomes. Presented at the 101st RSNA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 29 November – 4 December 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Conant, E.F. et al. (2016). Summary of Outcomes from Consecutive Years of Tomosynthesis Screening at an American Academic Institution. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)