Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 10))

  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

It is argued that to a greater or less extent, all mathematical knowledge is empirical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [5], vol IV, pp. 502–505.

  2. 2.

    See [5] vol. III, p. 312.

  3. 3.

    See [5] vol. V, p. 204.

  4. 4.

    See [5], vol. III, p. 313.

  5. 5.

    See [5] vol. III, p. 50.

  6. 6.

    See [4] pp. 331–339.

  7. 7.

    See [9] p. 295.

  8. 8.

    See [10] p. 371.

  9. 9.

    This discussion, including the quotations, is based on Paolo Mancosu’s wonderful monograph [7].

  10. 10.

    The method of exhaustion typically required one to have the answer at hand, whereas with indivisibles the answer could be computed.

  11. 11.

    See [7] p. 172.

  12. 12.

    Because otherwise the consistency of ZF would be provable in ZF contradicting Gödel’s second incompleteness theorem. For that matter the set \(V_{\omega 2}\) cannot be proved to exist from the Zermelo axioms alone; in ZF its existence follows using Replacement.

  13. 13.

    Number theorists regard the use of Grothendiek universes as a mere convenience. See [8] for a careful discussion.

References

  1. Barrow, J. D., & Tipler, F. J. (1986). The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boole, G. (1865). A treatise on differential equations. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, M. (2005). What did Gödel believe and when did he believe it? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 11, 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, M., Matiyasevich, Yu., & Robinson, J. (1976). Hilbert’s tenth problem. Diophantine equations: Positive aspects of a negative solution. In Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics: Positive Aspects of a Negative Solution (Vol. XXVIII, pp. 323–378).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feferman, S., et al. (1986–2003). Kurt Gödel Collected Works (Vols. I–V). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frege, G. (1892). Rezension von: Georg Cantor. Zum Lehre vom Transfiniten. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, new series, 100, 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mancosu, P. (1996). Philosophy of mathematics & mathematical practice in the seventeenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLarty, C. (2010). What does it take to prove Fermat’s last theorem? Grothendiek and the logic of number theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 16, 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Post, E. L. (1944). Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50, 284–316. Reprinted: M. Davis (Ed.), The undecidable Raven Press, New York 1965; Dover, New York 2004. Reprinted:: M. Davis (Ed.), Solvability, provability, definability: The collected works of Emil L. Post, Birkhäuser 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Heijenoort, J. (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, M. (2016). Pragmatic Platonism. In: Omodeo, E., Policriti, A. (eds) Martin Davis on Computability, Computational Logic, and Mathematical Foundations. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41842-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics