Abstract
Esophageal perforation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Successful management of these patients requires a comprehensive understanding of anatomy as the esophagus traverses three domains of the body: the neck, chest, and abdomen. The esophagus lacks a serosal layer, and is more susceptible to leakage and less tolerant of surgical repair. Esophageal perforations may be spontaneous, post-operative, iatrogenic, and disease related (e.g., tumor). As minimally invasive thoracic surgery becomes more prevalent, endoscopic, laparoscopic, video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and open techniques are all now used in the management of esophageal perforations. Careful patient selection is critical to ensure good outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Yekeler E, Karaoglanoglu N. Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:374–80.
Markar SR, MacKenzie H, Wiggins T, et al. Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation: a national study of 2,564 patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(11):1559–66.
Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1475–83.
Kavic SM, Basson MD. Complications of endoscopy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:319–32.
Barrett NR. Spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus: review of the literature and report of three cases. Thorax. 1946;1:48–70.
Lucendo AJ, Friginal-Ruiz AB, Rodriguez B. Boerhaave’s syndrome as the primary manifestation of adult eosinophilic esophagitis. Two case reports and a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2011;34:E11–5.
Cohen MS, Kaufman A, DiMarino AJ, Cohen S. Eosinophilic esophagitis presenting as spontaneous esophageal rupture. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:24.
Olson AM, Clagget OT. Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus: report of a case with immediate diagnosis and successful surgical repair. Postgrad Med. 1947;2:417–21.
Blackmon SH, Santora R, Schwarz P, et al. Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(3):931–6.
David EA, Kim MP, Blackmon SH. Esophageal salvage with removable covered self-expanding metal stents in the setting of intrathoracic esophageal leakage. Am J Surg. 2011;202:796–801.
Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ. Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of spontaneous esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):194–8.
Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C, Wilson SE. Minimally invasive management of intrathoracic leaks after esophagectomy. Surg Innov. 2007;14(2):96–101.
Martin LW, Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Roth JA. Management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy. Adv Surg. 2006;40:173–90.
Erdogan A, Gurses G, Keskin H, Demircan A. The sealing effect of a fibrin tissue patch on the esophageal perforation area in primary repair. World J Surg. 2007;31:2199–203.
Stephens EH, Correa AM, Kim MP, et al. Classification of esophageal stent leaks: leak presentation, complications and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:297–303.
Iannettoni MD, Vlessis AA, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Functional outcome after surgical treatment of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;34(6):1606–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dickinson, K.J., Blackmon, S.H. (2017). Esophageal Perforation. In: Moore, L., Todd, S. (eds) Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42792-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42792-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42790-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42792-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)