Skip to main content

Esophageal Perforation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery

Abstract

Esophageal perforation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Successful management of these patients requires a comprehensive understanding of anatomy as the esophagus traverses three domains of the body: the neck, chest, and abdomen. The esophagus lacks a serosal layer, and is more susceptible to leakage and less tolerant of surgical repair. Esophageal perforations may be spontaneous, post-operative, iatrogenic, and disease related (e.g., tumor). As minimally invasive thoracic surgery becomes more prevalent, endoscopic, laparoscopic, video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and open techniques are all now used in the management of esophageal perforations. Careful patient selection is critical to ensure good outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Yekeler E, Karaoglanoglu N. Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:374–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markar SR, MacKenzie H, Wiggins T, et al. Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation: a national study of 2,564 patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(11):1559–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1475–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kavic SM, Basson MD. Complications of endoscopy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:319–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett NR. Spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus: review of the literature and report of three cases. Thorax. 1946;1:48–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucendo AJ, Friginal-Ruiz AB, Rodriguez B. Boerhaave’s syndrome as the primary manifestation of adult eosinophilic esophagitis. Two case reports and a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2011;34:E11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen MS, Kaufman A, DiMarino AJ, Cohen S. Eosinophilic esophagitis presenting as spontaneous esophageal rupture. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olson AM, Clagget OT. Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus: report of a case with immediate diagnosis and successful surgical repair. Postgrad Med. 1947;2:417–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackmon SH, Santora R, Schwarz P, et al. Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(3):931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. David EA, Kim MP, Blackmon SH. Esophageal salvage with removable covered self-expanding metal stents in the setting of intrathoracic esophageal leakage. Am J Surg. 2011;202:796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ. Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of spontaneous esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C, Wilson SE. Minimally invasive management of intrathoracic leaks after esophagectomy. Surg Innov. 2007;14(2):96–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin LW, Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Roth JA. Management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy. Adv Surg. 2006;40:173–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erdogan A, Gurses G, Keskin H, Demircan A. The sealing effect of a fibrin tissue patch on the esophageal perforation area in primary repair. World J Surg. 2007;31:2199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephens EH, Correa AM, Kim MP, et al. Classification of esophageal stent leaks: leak presentation, complications and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iannettoni MD, Vlessis AA, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Functional outcome after surgical treatment of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;34(6):1606–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanda H. Blackmon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dickinson, K.J., Blackmon, S.H. (2017). Esophageal Perforation. In: Moore, L., Todd, S. (eds) Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42792-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42792-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42790-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42792-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics