Skip to main content

Communication, Culture, and Work in Mathematics Education in Departments of Mathematical Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 7))

Abstract

Communication is much more than words—written, spoken, or unspoken. It is also in how a person participates in or orchestrates discussion (in a hallway or in a meeting). Conversation is shaped by what a person knows or anticipates about colleagues’ previous experiences and how to attend to that in the context of the goals of a given professional interaction. This chapter builds a foundation of ideas from discourse theory and intercultural competence development as aspects of communication. The presentation is grounded in two vignettes and several small examples of discourse about work in mathematics education. The ideas and vignettes provide touchstones for noticing and understanding what happens when people communicate across professional cultures within departments of mathematics.

MSC Code

97B40

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In J. Wurzel (Ed.), Towards multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 62–77). Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M., & Ludlow, L. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center? Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R. (2009). The intercultural development inventory. In M. A. Moodian (Ed.), Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: Exploring the cross-cultural dynamics within organizations (pp. 203–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, S., Toney, A. F., Jackson, B., Nair, R., & Tsay, J.-J. (2014). Developing a model of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary and post-secondary mathematics instruction. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 2, A16–A40. Retrieved March 22, 2016, from dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/download/40/50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, S., Toney, A. F., Nair, R., Yestness, N. R., & Troudt, M. (2015). Discourse in pedagogical content knowledge. In T. Fukakawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, K. Keene, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, February 19–21, 2015 in Pittsburg, PA (pp. 170–184). Retrieved June 24, 2016, from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME18-final.pdf

  • Hauk, S., Yestness, N., & Novak, J. (2011). Transitioning from cultural diversity to cultural competence in mathematics instruction. In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, February 24–27, 2011 in Portland, OR (pp. 128–131). Retrieved June 24, 2016, from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME_XIV_Proceedings_Volume_1.pdf

  • Maltz, D. J., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumpertz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A. (1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 127–155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender as culture hypothesis. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N., & de Waal‐Andrews, W. (2005). Playing to win: Biological imperatives, self‐regulation, and trade‐offs in the game of career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., & Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reys, R. E. (2008). Jobs in mathematics education in institutions of higher education in the United States. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 55(6), 676–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuter, R., & Turner, L. H. (1997). African American and European American women in the workplace. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, A. (1992). When “difference” is “dominance”: A critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society, 21(4), 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, C., Wiryakusuma, C., Bowden, J., & Shochet, M. (2011). Stereotype threat and female communication styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1312–1324. doi:10.1177/0146167211410439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Nos. DUE 0832026 and DUE 1504551. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shandy Hauk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hauk, S., Toney, A.F. (2016). Communication, Culture, and Work in Mathematics Education in Departments of Mathematical Sciences. In: Dewar, J., Hsu, Ps., Pollatsek, H. (eds) Mathematics Education. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44950-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics