Skip to main content

The Effect of Early Media Projections on Presidential Voting in the Florida Panhandle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explorations in Public Sector Economics

Abstract

The media incorrectly called Al Gore the winner of Florida at 7:48 p.m. eastern time with 12 min still remaining to vote in the 10 Central time zone counties in Florida. In addition, the media reported that polls “close in Florida at 7:00 p.m. eastern time,” which may have misled some panhandle voters into thinking their polls closed at 6:00 p.m. central time. Given the closeness of the popular vote in Florida, and the degree to which the outcome in the state was contested, these media miscues could have been decisive in the election. When Bush was behind in the recount, his supporters adamantly claimed their candidate suffered a loss of votes because of these media miscues. We test this hypothesis and reject it. Our regression results find no significant impact on the Gore/Bush vote differential, nor do we find any impact on voter turnout or third party voting, in these counties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several of these studies were featured on the www.yahoo.com site and were summarized on Greg Adam’s web page at Carnegie Mellon University (madison.hss.cmu.edu) and Jonathan Okeefe’s webpage (bestbookmarks.com), which are archived at the Internet Archive.

  2. 2.

    We know of only two other attempts to study this particular issue. Romely (2000) finds that George W. Bush’s relative performance was better in the central time zone counties in 2000 than was Bob Doles performance in the election of 1996. Using a larger panel of Florida presidential elections since 1976, Lott Jr (2005) finds an “unusual and large drop off in Republican voting rates” in Florida’s western panhandle.

  3. 3.

    (Gore %-Bush %) \(\times \) 100.

  4. 4.

    (Total votes 2000/Total votes 1996).

  5. 5.

    ((Total votes 2000/Registered voters) \(\times \) 100).

References

  • Brennan G, Lomasky L (1993) Democracy and decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1954) Individual choice in voting and the market. J Polit Econ 62(4):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JR et al (1984) Early projections and voter turnout in the 1980 presidential election. Public Choice 43(2):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DP, Shapiro I, Shapiro I (1994) Pathologies of rational choice theory: a critique of applications in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott JR Jr (2005) The impact of early media election calls on republican voting rates in floridas western panhandle counties in 2000. Public Choice 123(3–4):349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka JG (1993) Election closeness and voter turnout: evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice 76(4):313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka JG (1995) Explaining voter turnout patterns: an information theory. Public Choice 84(1–2):91–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka JG, Palda F (1999) Voter turnout: how much can we explain? Public Choice 98(3–4):431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin and Associates (2000) Panhandle poll summary: Networks’ wrong Florida call for gore cost bush votes

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield J (1993) The institutional and political factors that influence voter turnout. Public Choice 77(3):657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin DB (2001) Committee for honest politics: testimony before the United States senate governmental affairs committee

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker WH, Ordeshook PC (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 62(01):25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romely J (2000) Statistical analysis of Florida election, working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar R, Nalebuff B (1999) Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. Am Econ Rev 89(3):525–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1967) Toward a mathematics of politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1971) The charity of the uncharitable. West Econ J 9(4):379–392

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell S. Sobel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sobel, R.S., Lawson, R.A. (2017). The Effect of Early Media Projections on Presidential Voting in the Florida Panhandle. In: Hall, J. (eds) Explorations in Public Sector Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47828-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics