Skip to main content

Robust Estimation of Heckman Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robustness in Econometrics

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 692))

  • 1753 Accesses

Abstract

We first review the basic ideas of robust statistics and define the main tools used to formalize the problem and to construct new robust statistical procedures. In particular we focus on the influence function, the Gâteaux derivative of a functional in direction of a point mass, which can be used both to study the local stability properties of a statistical procedure and to construct new robust procedures. In the second part we show how these principles can be used to carry out a robustness analysis in [13] model and how to construct robust versions of Heckman’s two-stage estimator. These are central tools for the statistical analysis of data based on non-random samples from a population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn H, Powell JL (1993) Semiparametric estimation of censored selection models with a nonparametric selection mechanism. J Econometrics 58:3–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Avella Medina M, Ronchetti E (2015) Robust statistics: a selective overview and new directions. WIREs Comput Stat 7:372–393

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchinsky M (1998) The dynamics of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: a quantile regression approach. J Appl Econometrics 13:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantoni E, Ronchetti E (2001) Robust inference for generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1022–1030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowell F, Victoria-Feser M (1996) Robustness properties of inequality measures. Econometrica 64:77–101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Das M, Newey WK, Vella F (2003) Nonparametric estimation of sample selection models. Rev Econ Stud 70:33–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Genton MG, Rousseeuw PJ (1995) The change-of-variance function of M-estimators of scale under general contamination. J Comput Appl Math 64:69–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene WH (1981) Sample selection bias as a specification error: comment. Econometrica 49:795–798

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hampel F (1968) Contribution to the theory of robust estimation. Ph.D thesis, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hampel F (1974) The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 69:383–393

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hampel F, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA (1986) Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampel F, Rousseeuw PJ, Ronchetti E (1981) The change-of-variance curve and optimal redescending M-estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 76:643–648

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill JB, Prokhorov A (2016) GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference. J Econometrics 190:18–45

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Huber M, Melly B (2015) A test of the conditional independence assumption in sample selection models. J Appl Econometrics 30:1144–1168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Huber PJ (1964) Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat 35:73–101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber PJ, Ronchetti E (2009) Robust statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein RW, Spady RH (1993) Efficient semiparametric estimator for binary response models. Econometrica 61:387–421

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Marchenko YV, Genton MG (2012) A Heckman selection-\(t\) model. J Am Stat Assoc 107:304–317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Maronna RA, Martin GR, Yohai VJ (2006) Robust statistics: theory and methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Marra G, Radice R (2013) Estimation of a regression spline sample selection model. Comput Stat Data Anal 61:158–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Montes-Rojas GV (2011) Robust misspecification tests for the Heckman’s two-step estimator. Econometric Rev 30:154–172

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Newey WK (2009) Two-step series estimation of sample selection models. Econometrics J 12:S217–S229

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Peracchi F (1990) Bounded-influence estimators for the Tobit model. J Econometrics 44:107–126

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Peracchi F (1991) Robust M-tests. Econometric Theory 7:69–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ronchetti E, Trojani F (2001) Robust inference with GMM estimators. J Econometrics 101:37–69

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakata S, White H (1998) High breakdown point conditional dispersion estimation with application to S & P 500 daily returns volatility. Econometrica 66:529–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Salazar L (2008) A robustness study of Heckman’s model. Master’s thesis, University of Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vella F (1998) Estimating models with sample selection bias: a survey. J Hum Res 33:127–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. von Mises R (1947) On the asymptotic distribution of differentiable statistical functions. Ann Math Stat 18:309–348

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Winship C, Mare RD (1992) Models for sample selection bias. Ann Rev Soc 18:327–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhelonkin M, Genton MG, Ronchetti E (2016) Robust inference in sample selection models. J R Stat Soc Ser B 78:805–827

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvezio Ronchetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ronchetti, E. (2017). Robust Estimation of Heckman Model. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S., Huynh, VN. (eds) Robustness in Econometrics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50741-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50742-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics