Skip to main content

Linguistic Representation by Fuzzy Formal Concept and Interval Type-2 Feature Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2016)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 557))

Abstract

Natural language is always seen as a source of uncertainty and vagueness. Fuzzy logic (FL) is a powerful tool for representing and treating perceptions which are the inputs and outputs of a linguistic model. In fact, a linguistic representation is a methodology that moves from crisp measures to uncertain words or fuzzy concepts. This theory uses fuzzy sets to encode and represent linguistic concepts. In this paper, an interval type-2 fuzzy formal concept IT-2FFC is presented as a new approach for extracting knowledge in a linguistic model. The method represents a combination of two techniques: fuzzy formal concept (FFC) for visualizing data and interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT-2FSs) for feature selection. The obtained results demonstrate that the method applied can help human to make subjective judgments and make decision in a knowledge model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic = computing with words. Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 4, 103–111 (1996). IEEE Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Belohlavek, R., Klir, G.J.: Concepts and Fuzzy Logic. The Mit Press, Cambridge (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Belohlavek, R., Klir, G.J., Lewis III, H.W., Way, E.C.: Concepts and fuzzy sets: misunderstandings, misconceptions, and oversights. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 51, 23–34 (2009). Elsevier Science Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lackoff, G.: Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. J. Philos. Log. 2, 458–508 (1972)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gajdos, P., Snasel, V.: A new FCA algorithm enabling analyzing of complex and dynamic data sets. Soft Comput. 18, 683–694 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wille, R.: Restructuring Lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Ferré, S., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ICFCA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5548, pp. 314–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01815-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Formica, A.: Ontology-based concept similarity in formal concept analysis. Inf. Sci. 176, 2624–2641 (2006). Elsevier Science Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, S., Zhou, Y., Martin, T.: A new method for fuzzy formal concept analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 03, pp. 405–408. IEEE Computer Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, S.-T., Tsai, F.-C.: A fuzzy conceptualization model for text mining with application in opinion polarity classification. Knowl.-Based Syst. 39, 23–33 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, C., Ruan, D.: Fuzzy control rules extraction from perception-based information using computing with words. Inf. Sci. 142, 275–275 (2002). Elsevier Science Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kacprzyk, J., Yager, R.R.: Linguistic summaries of data using fuzzy logic. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 30, 133–154 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cherif, S., Baklouti, N., Alimi, A.: The encoding part. In: 6th International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), pp. 471–476 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 179, 1169–1192 (2009). Elsevier Science Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cherif, S., Baklouti, N., Alimi, A.M., Snasel, V.: A type-2 fuzzy concepts lexicalized representation by perceptual reasoning and linguistic weighted average: a comparative study. In: Abraham, A., Han, S.Y., Al-Sharhan, S.A., Liu, H. (eds.) Hybrid Intelligent Systems. AISC, vol. 420, pp. 77–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27221-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, F., Mendel, J.: Encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets using an interval approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 1503–1521 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of this work by grants from General Direction of Scientific Research (DGRST), Tunisia, under the ARUB program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Cherif .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cherif, S., Baklouti, N., Alimi, A.M., Snasel, V. (2017). Linguistic Representation by Fuzzy Formal Concept and Interval Type-2 Feature Selection. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gamboa, D., Novais, P. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 557. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_105

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53479-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53480-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics