Skip to main content

What Decides the Dropout in MOOCs?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10179))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Based on the datasets from the MOOCs of Peking University running on the Coursera platform, we extract 19 major features of tune in after analyzing the log structure. To begin with, we focus on the characteristics of start and dropout point of learners through the statistics of their start time and dropout time. Then we construct two models. First, several approaches of machine learning are used to build a sliding window model for predicting the dropout probabilities in a certain course. Second, SVM is used to build the model for predicting whether a student can get a score at the end of the course. For instructors and designers of MOOCs, dynamically tracking the records of the dropouts could be helpful to improve the course quality in order to reduce the dropout rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amnueypornsakul, B., Bhat, S., Chinprutthiwong, P.: Predicting attrition along the way: the UIUC model. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 55–59 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., Means, B.: Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: an issue brief. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, pp. 1–57 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elouazizi, N.: Point-of-view mining and cognitive presence in MOOCs: a (computational) linguistics perspective. In: EMNLP 2014, p. 32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo, P.J., Reinecke, K.: Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp. 21–30. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan, K.: MOOC completion rates: the data (2013). http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2014

  6. Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 60–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mi, F.: Machine learning models for some learning analytics issues in massive open online courses. Ph.D. thesis, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mining, T.E.D.: Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: an issue brief. In: Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Technology for Education (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moon, S., Potdar, S., Martin, L.: Identifying student leaders from MOOC discussion forums through language influence. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 15–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosé, C.P., Siemens, G.: Shared task on prediction of dropout over time in massively open online courses. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, vol. 14, p. 39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharkey, M., Sanders, R.: A process for predicting MOOC attrition. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs. pp. 50–54 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinha, T., Jermann, P., Li, N., Dillenbourg, P.: Your click decides your fate: inferring information processing and attrition behavior from MOOC video clickstream interactions. arXiv preprint (2014). arXiv:1407.7131

  13. Taylor, C., Veeramachaneni, K., O’Reilly, U.M.: Likely to stop? Predicting stopout in massive open online courses. arXiv preprint (2014). arXiv:1408.3382

  14. Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., Rosé, C.P.: Turn on, tune in, drop out: anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop, vol. 11, p. 14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, D., Wen, M., Rose, C.: Towards identifying the resolvability of threads in MOOCs. In: EMNLP 2014, p. 21 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by Peking University Education Foundation (2015ZD05) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (61472013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shengqing Wang or Wenguang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, X., Wang, S., Huang, J., Chen, W., Yan, Z. (2017). What Decides the Dropout in MOOCs?. In: Bao, Z., Trajcevski, G., Chang, L., Hua, W. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55704-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55705-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics