Skip to main content

Comprehensively Critical Metapolitics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Encouraging Openness

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 325))

  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

The context of Popper’s advocacy of critical rationalism is his defense of the open society. Popper rejects uncritical or comprehensive rationalism as self-defeating and thus an invitation to irrationalism which, in turn, endangers the open society. Bartley argued that a thoroughly critical rationalism can remain comprehensive and consistent, rendering unnecessary Popper’s “minimal concession to irrationalism.” Popper’s rejection of Bartley’s claim and the ensuing debate are abstracted from the metapolitical question of the best defense of a rationalism supportive of an open society. This essay surveys the debate over the limits of critical rationalism in terms of Popper’s original political, or metapolitical project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W., Hans Albert, Ralf Darendorf, Jurgen Habermas, Harold Pilot, and Karl R. Popper. 1976. The positivist dispute in German sociology. Trans. Glyn Adey and David Frisby. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1981a. Science and Society. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981b [1968]. Science in flux: Footnotes to Popper. In Boston studies on the philosophy of science, Vol. 3, ed. Robert S. Cohen and Marx W. Wartofsky. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981c. Rationality and the Tu Quoque argument. In Science and society: Studies in the sociology of science, ed. J. Agassi. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Theories of rationality. In Rationality: The critical view, ed. J. Agassi and I. Jarvie. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The siblinghood of humanity: An introduction to philosophy. Delmar: Caravan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. A philosopher’s apprentice: In Karl Popper’s workshop. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Critical rationalism, comprehensive or qualified: The Popper-Bartley dispute. In Der Kritische Rationalismus als Denkmethode und Lebensweisse: Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Hans Albert, ed. Giuseppe Franco. Klagenfurt: Kitab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, and Ian C. Jarvie, eds. 1987. Rationality: The critical view. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, Ian C. Jarvie, and Tom Settle. 1971. The grounds of reason. Philosophy 46: 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Hans. 1985. Treatise on critical reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, Alain. 2005. Metapolitics. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W.W. III. 1964. Rationality vs. theories of rationality. In The critical approach to science and philosophy: Essays in honor of K. R. Popper, ed. M. Bunge. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. The retreat to commitment. 2nd ed. La Salle/London: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Unfathomed knowledge, unmeasured wealth. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W.W. III, and Gerard Radnitzky. 1987. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiariello, Michael. 1983. The philosophical critique of radicalism and its limits. Philosophy Research Archives 9: 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes. 1960. Meditations. Trans. L.J. Lafleur. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against method. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattei, Stefano. 2002. The ethical nature of Karl Popper’s solution to the problem of rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2): 240–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, John. 1971. Watkins on rationalism. Philosophy 46 (175): 51–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 1994. Critical rationalism: A restatement and defense. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 1945 [1966]. The open society and its enemies. 5th rev ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1948 [1963]. Utopia and violence. In Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge, 355–363. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. The unended quest. London: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994a. The myth of the framework. In Defence of science and rationality, ed. Mark A. Notturno. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994b. Reason or revolution? In The myth of the framework, ed. Mark A. Notturno. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck, Peter. 2003. Metapolitics: From Wagner and the German romantics to Hitler. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Richard. 2013. Open letter to Richard Wagner. In Bayreuther blätter-primary source edition (German Edition). Charleston: Nabu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, John. 1969. Comprehensively critical rationalism. Philosophy 44: 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. CCR: A refutation. Philosophy 46: 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Comprehensively critical rationalism: A retrospect. In Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge, ed. G. Radnitzky and W.W. Bartley III, 270–271. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Chiariello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiariello, M. (2017). Comprehensively Critical Metapolitics. In: Bar-Am, N., Gattei, S. (eds) Encouraging Openness. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics