Skip to main content

Smart Technologies for Smart Governments: A Review of Technological Tools in Smart Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Technologies for Smart Governments

Abstract

The availability of ubiquitous ICT infrastructures in smart cities stimulates the development of new services and applications, and creates environments more efficient in collaborative problem-solving and innovation. This chapter looks at the use of new technologies by city governments in smart cities with the aim at improving e-services and at facilitating the participation of citizenry in the process of making decisions in the public arena. To achieve this aim, we have revised the ICTs that smart cities included in the EUROCITIES network are using to deliver public services and to promote e-participation in the city management. Findings indicate the need of improving in active participation into these cities with the aim at creating public value. Else, city governments could be only reproducing old mechanisms in new technological environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AMETIC. (2013). Smart cities 2012. Madrid: Leaders Comunicación.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurigi, A. (2005). Making the digital city: The early shaping of urban internet space. Farnborough: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bătăgan, L. (2011). Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatica Economică, 15(3), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal, 214, 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belissent, J. (2011). The core of a smart city must be smart governance. Cambridge: Forrester Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., & Amitrano, C. C. (2017). Co-governing smart cities through living labs. Top evidences from EU. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 13(50), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe. In Proceedings to the 3rd Central European Conference on Regional Science, Košice, Slovak Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Cities. (2014). What does it mean to be a smart city? Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.centreforcities.org/blog/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-smart-city/

  • Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (1999). Governance at ground level: The front-line bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, P. (2011). SCRAN: The network. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dameri, R. P. (2012, June). Defining an evaluation framework for digital cities implementation. In 2012 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society) (pp. 466–470). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dameri, R. P. (2014). Comparing smart and digital city: Initiatives and strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are they digital and/or smart?. In Smart city (pp. 45–88). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. (2010). SCRAN: The SmartCities (inter) regional academic network supporting the development of a trans-national comparator for the standardisation of e-government services. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative e-government: An examination of e-government across countries. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M. (2012). Intelligent cities as smart providers: CoPs as organizations for developing integrated models of eGovernment Services. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., DiFranzo, D., Graves, A., Michaelis, J., Li, X., McGuinness, D. L., et al. (2010, March). Data-gov Wiki: Towards linking government data. In AAAI Spring symposium: Linked data meets artificial intelligence (Vol. 10, p. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S., & Meijer, A. (2016). Transparency and public value—Analyzing the transparency practices and value creation of public utilities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 940–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROCITIES. (2016). EUROCITIES strategic framework 2014–2020. Toward an urban agenda for the EU. Brussels: EUROCITIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final Report, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architecture City and Environment, 4(12), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2015). Foreword. In Transforming city governments for successful smart cities (pp. v–vii). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramberguer, M. R. (2001). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Publications de l’OCDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoon Lee, J., Phaal, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxha, J., & Brahaj, A. (2011, September). Open government data on the web: A semantic approach. In 2011 international conference on Emerging intelligent data and Web technologies (EIDWT) (pp. 107–113). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukic, T., & Merlak, M. (2017). The use of social networking sites in public administration: The case of Slovenia. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(1), 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhsh, P., Fathi, H., & Mashayekhi, S. (2016). Planning for future urban services in the smart city era: Integrating E-services in urban planning process.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, N. (2010). The critical role of cities in making the Digital Agenda a reality. Closing speech to Global Cities Dialogue Spring Summit of Mayors. European Commission-SPEECH/10/272, Brussels, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukovič, S. (2015). E-democracy and E-participation in Slovenian local self-government. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 15(2), 451–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebo, T., & Williams, G. T. (2010, September). Converting governmental datasets into linked data. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems (p. 38). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A. (2016). Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In Smarter as the New Urban Agenda (pp. 73–85). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., & Kourtit, K. (2013). The “new urban Europe”: Global challenges and local responses in the urban century. European Planning Studies, 21(3), 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, K. (2012, June). Transparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphere. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 223–232). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), 585–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Government at a glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, S., Marceau, J., & Randolph, B. (2008). Innovation for a carbon constrained city: Challenges for the built environment industry. Innovation, 10(2–3), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preissl, B., & Mueller, J. (Eds.). (2006). Governance of communication networks: Connecting societies and markets with IT. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Doll, C. N. H., Balaban, O., Jiang, P., Dreyfus, M., et al. (2013). Green economy and governance in cities: Assessing good governance in key urban economic processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reggi, L., & Ricci, C. A. (2011, August). Information strategies for open government in Europe: EU regions opening up the data on structural funds. In International conference on electronic government (pp. 173–184). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015a). Policy makers’ perceptions on the transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on public services delivery. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015b). Smart cities: Big cities, complex governance? In Transforming city governments for successful smart cities (pp. 1–7). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2015c). The influence of political factors in policymakers’ perceptions on the implementation of Web 2.0 technologies for citizen participation and knowledge sharing in public sector delivery. Information Polity, 20(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016a). Characterizing the role of governments in smart cities: A literature review. In Smarter as the new urban agenda (pp. 49–71). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016b). Policymakers’ perceptions on the citizen participation and knowledge sharing in public sector delivery. In Social media and local governments (pp. 37–56). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2017). Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. Scienze Regionali (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Navarro Galera, A., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Subirés, M. D. (2016). Risk factors and drivers of financial sustainability in local government: An empirical study. Local Government Studies, 42(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Pérez, C. C., & Hernández, A. M. L. (2006). Cultural contexts and governmental digital reporting. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, S. (2012). Do smart cities produce smart entrepreneurs? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011, May). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In The future internet assembly (pp. 431–446). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Jesse M. (2006). Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 324–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., & Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S106–S117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity, 19(1, 2), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with financial support from the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain), Department of Innovation, Science and Enterprise (Research project number P11-SEJ-7700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

López-Quiles, J.M., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (2018). Smart Technologies for Smart Governments: A Review of Technological Tools in Smart Cities. In: Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics