Skip to main content

On Combining Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2017)

Abstract

In real-world problems, data are generally characterized by their imperfection. One of the most common forms of imperfection is missing data. In fact, dealing with missing data remains a very important issue in data mining and knowledge discovery researches. A panoply of methods, addressing this problem, is proposed in the literature handling different types of data. In this work, we focus our study towards three methods which are KNN, MissForest, and EM algorithm. These methods are considered among the most efficient in different imputation problems. In the first part of this work, we present a brief state of the art of the used imputation methods and the strategy that we propose to use. In the second part, we provide a comparative study based on different criterion showing the efficiency of MissForest compared to the other methods and we demonstrate that the combination is preferable to improve the imputation of continuous data instead of using them individually.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afshari Safavi, A., Kazemzadeh Gharechobogh, H., Rezaei, M.: Comparison Of EM algorithm and standard imputation methods for missing data: a questionnaire study on diabetic patients. Iran. J. Epidemiol. 11(3), 43–51 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batista, G.E., Monard, M.C.: A study of K-Nearest neighbour as an imputation method. HIS 87(251–260), 48 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J., Shao, J.: Nearest neighbor imputation for survey data. J. Official Stat. 16(2), 113 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Meth.) 39, 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Merz, C.J., Murphy, P.M.: UCI repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science (1998). http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  7. Oba, S., Sato, M.A., Takemasa, I., Monden, M., Matsubara, K.I., Ishii, S.: A Bayesian missing value estimation method for gene expression profile data. Bioinformatics 19(16), 2088–2096 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Penone, C., Davidson, A.D., Shoemaker, K.T., Di Marco, M., Rondinini, C., Brooks, T.M., Young, B.E., Graham, C.H., Costa, G.C.: Imputation of missing data in life-history traits datasets: which approach performs the best? Meth. Ecol. Evol. 5, 961–970 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin, D.B.: Basic ideas of multiple imputation for nonresponse. Surv. Methodol. 12(1), 37–47 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin, D.B., Little, R.J.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shipp, C.A., Kuncheva, L.I.: Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers. Inf. Fusion 3(2), 135–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stdler, N., Bühlmann, P.: Pattern alternating maximization algorithm for high-dimensional missing data. Arxiv preprint arXiv, 1005 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stekhoven, D.J., Bühlmann, P.: MissForestnon-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28(1), 112–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Troyanskaya, O., Cantor, M., Sherlock, G., Brown, P., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Botstein, D., Altman, R.B.: Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17(6), 520–525 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, X.P.: Comparison of four methods for handing missing data in longitudinal data analysis through a simulation study. Open J. Stat. 4(11), 933 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nassima Ben Hariz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ben Hariz, N., Khoufi, H., Zagrouba, E. (2017). On Combining Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Data. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60041-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60042-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics