Skip to main content

Keeping the Teacher in the Loop: Technologies for Monitoring Group Learning in Real-Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2017)

Abstract

Learning in groups allows students to develop academic and social competencies but requires the presence of a human teacher that is actively guiding the group. In this paper we combine data-mining and visualization tools to support teachers’ understanding of learners’ activities in an inquiry based learning environment. We use supervised learning to recognize salient states of activity in the group’s work, such as reaching a solution to a problem, exhibiting idleness, or experiencing technical challenges. These “critical” moments are visualized to teachers in real time, allowing them to monitor several groups in parallel and to intervene when necessary to guide the group. We embedded this technology in a new system, called SAGLET, which augments existing collaborative educational software and was evaluated empirically in real classrooms. We show that the recognition capabilities of SAGLET are compatible with that of a human domain expert. Teachers were able to use the system successfully to make intervention decisions in groups when deemed necessary, without overwhelming them with information. Our results demonstrate how AI can be used to augment existing educational environments to support the “teacher in the group”, and to scale up the benefits of group learning to the actual classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original language of operation for SAGLET was Hebrew, and all of the examples shown in this paper are translations.

  2. 2.

    Random forest achieved superior results to two alternative models, a Multi-Layer Perceptron, and a Gaussian Naive Bayes model.

References

  1. Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., Rosé, C.P.: Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(1), 92–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asterhan, S.C., Schwarz, B.B.: Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognit. Sci. 33(3), 374–400 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, W.: Supporting teachers’ intervention in collaborative knowledge building. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 29(2), 200–215 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Damşa, C.I., Ludvigsen, S.: Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 11, 1–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K.R.: Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22(1), 89–102 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engle, R.A., Conant, F.R.: Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognit. Instr. 20(4), 399–483 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita, T., Jones, K.: Learners understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing. Res. Math. Educ. 9(1), 3–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Israel, J., Aiken, R.: Supporting collaborative learning with an intelligent web-based system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 17(1), 3–40 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kazemitabar, M.A., et al.: Creating instructor dashboards to foster collaborative learning in on-line medical problem-based learning situations. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9753, pp. 36–47. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ludvigsen, S.: Sociogenesis and cognition. In: Transformation of Knowledge Through Classroom Interaction, p. 302 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Magnisalis, I., Demetriadis, S., Karakostas, A.: Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: a review of the field. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(1), 5–20 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Maldonado, R., Clayphan, A., Yacef, K., Kay, J.: MTFeedback: providing notifications to enhance teacher awareness of small group work in the classroom. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 8(2), 187–200 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez Maldonado, R., Kay, J., Yacef, K., Schwendimann, B.: An interactive teacher’s dashboard for monitoring groups in a multi-tabletop learning environment. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 482–492. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaren, B.M., Scheuer, O., Mikšátko, J.: Supporting collaborative learning and e-discussions using artificial intelligence techniques. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 20(1), 1–46 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., Resnick, L.B.: Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Stud. Philos. Educ. 27(4), 283–297 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullins, D., Rummel, N., Spada, H.: Are two heads always better than one? Differential effects of collaboration on students’ computer-supported learning in mathematics. Int. J. Comput. Supp. Collaborative Learn. 6(3), 421–443 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen, J.K., Belenky, D.M., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Using an intelligent tutoring system to support collaborative as well as individual learning. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 134–143. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., Thompson, K.: Using process mining to identify models of group decision making in chat data. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2009), vol. 1, pp. 98–107. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. Int. J. Comput. Supp. Collaborative Learn. 3(3), 237–271 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 97–118. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M.: Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. Int. J. Comput. Supp. Collaborative Learn. 5(1), 43–102 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwarz, B.B.: Argumentation and learning. In: Mirza, N.M., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (eds.) Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices, pp. 91–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Soller, A.: Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 12, 40–62 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soller, A.: Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 14(4), 351–381 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stahl, G.: Studying Virtual Math Teams, vol. 11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Webb, N.M.: The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 79(1), 1–28 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment. Learn. Instr. 17(4), 416–426 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White, B.Y., Frederiksen, J.R.: Technological tools and instructional approaches for making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In: Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning, pp. 321–359 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks very much to the Math Forum for making it possible for us to use the development version of the VMT software. Thanks to Roy Fairstein for developing the NLP and visualization interfaces to SAGLET. This work was funded in part thanks to the Kamin fund by the Israeli Ministry of Trade and Industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya’akov (Kobi) Gal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Segal, A. et al. (2017). Keeping the Teacher in the Loop: Technologies for Monitoring Group Learning in Real-Time. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M., du Boulay, B. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61424-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61425-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics