Skip to main content

Electrophysiological Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurolaryngology

Abstract

An electrophysiological examination normally includes the direct assessment of the nerve of interest and of its target muscles. Electrodiagnostics for the larynx are only well established for the investigation of the laryngeal muscles by laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). So far, techniques to investigate the nerves innervating the laryngeal muscles directly, for instance, by electric or magnetic stimulation of the recurrent nerve, do not produce reliable results or are only established in a few centers. Therefore, the focus of this chapter lies on LEMG. Although LEMG was established more than 60 years ago, many laryngologists do not routinely use even LEMG. Until recently, this was may be due to the continuous lack of agreement on methodology, interpretation, validity, and clinical application of LEMG. As a consequence, the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Neurolaryngology—and the working group on Neurolaryngology of the European Laryngological Society have published lately guidelines for the use of LEMG. The presentation of LEMG in this chapter is following these guidelines as it presents an update of the guideline of the European Laryngological Society. Furthermore, the basics and limitations of other electrodiagnostic tools are presented. The chapter concludes with an outlook on future perspectives of electrophysiological assessment of neurolaryngological disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blitzer A, Crumley RL, Dailey SH, Ford CN, Floeter MK, Hillel AD, et al. Recommendations of the neurolaryngology study group on laryngeal electromyography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(6):782–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Volk GF, Hagen R, Pototschnig C, Friedrich G, Nawka T, Arens C, et al. Laryngeal electromyography: a proposal for guidelines of the European laryngological society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(10):2227–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rickert SM, Childs LF, Carey BT, Murry T, Sulica L. Laryngeal electromyography for prognosis of vocal fold palsy: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2012 Jan;122(1):158–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingle JW, Young VN, Smith LJ, Munin MC, Rosen CA. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of laryngeal electromyography. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2745–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rontal E, Rontal M, Silverman B, Kileny PR. The clinical differentiation between vocal cord paralysis and vocal cord fixation using electromyography. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(2):133–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koufman JA, Postma GN, Whang CS, Rees CJ, Amin MR, Belafsky PC, et al. Diagnostic laryngeal electromyography: the wake Forest experience 1995–1999. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124(6):603–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guld C, Rosenfalck A, Willison RG. Technical factors in recording electrical activity of muscle and nerve in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970;28(4):399–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Basmajian JV. Electromyography in normal intact mammals before and after birth. Rev Can Biol. 1962;21:259–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gitter AJ, Stolov WC. AAEM minimonograph #16: instrumentation and measurement in electrodiagnostic medicine--part I. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18(8):799–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Storck C, Gehrer R, Hofer M, Neumayer B, Stollberger R, Schumacher R, et al. Laryngeal electromyography: electrode guidance based on 3-dimensional magnetic resonance tomography images of the larynx. J Voice. 2012;26(1):110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillel AD. The study of laryngeal muscle activity in normal human subjects and in patients with laryngeal dystonia using multiple fine-wire electromyography. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(4 Pt 2 Suppl 97):1–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirano M. Recent advance in laryngeal electromyography in human. Kurume Med J. 1969;16(3):119–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forster G, Arnold D, Bischoff SJ, Schubert H, Scholle HC, Muller AH. Laryngeal pacing in minipigs: in vivo test of a new minimal invasive transcricoidal electrode insertion method for functional electrical stimulation of the PCA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(1):225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zealear DL, Rainey CL, Jerles ML, Tanabe T, Herzon GD. Technical approach for reanimation of the chronically denervated larynx by means of functional electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103(9):705–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Statham MM, Rosen CA, Smith LJ, Munin MC. Electromyographic laryngeal synkinesis alters prognosis in vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(2):285–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seddon H. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66:237–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sittel C, Stennert E, Thumfart WF, Dapunt U, Eckel HE. Prognostic value of laryngeal electromyography in vocal fold paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(2):155–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blitzer A, Jahn AF, Keidar A. Semon’s law revisited: an electromyographic analysis of laryngeal synkinesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(10):764–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirchner JA. Semon’s law a century later. J Laryngol Otol. 1982;96:645–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasaki CT, Horiuchi M, Ikari T, Kirchner JA. Vocal cord positioning by selective denervation. Old territory revisited. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89(6 Pt 1):541–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stennert E. Why does the frontalis muscle “never come back”? Functional organization of the mimic musculature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994:S91–S5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heman-Ackah YD, Mandel S, Manon-Espaillat R, Abaza MM, Sataloff RT. Laryngeal electromyography. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2007;40(5):1003–23. vi-vii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maturo SC, Braun N, Brown DJ, Chong PS, Kerschner JE, Hartnick CJ. Intraoperative laryngeal electromyography in children with vocal fold immobility: results of a multicenter longitudinal study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(12):1251–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. AlQudehy Z, Norton J, El-Hakim H. Electromyography in children’s laryngeal mobility disorders: a proposed grading system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(10):936–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barker AT, Freeston IL, Jalinous R, Jarratt JA. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. 1987;20(1):100–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jasper HH. Report of committee on methods of clinical exam in EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1958;10:370–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khedr EM, Aref EE. Electrophysiological study of vocal-fold mobility disorders using a magnetic stimulator. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(3):259–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Statham MM, Rosen CA, Nandedkar SD, Munin MC. Quantitative laryngeal electromyography: turns and amplitude analysis. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(10):2036–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith LJ, Rosen CA, Niyonkuru C, Munin MC. Quantitative electromyography improves prediction in vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(4):854–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sulica L, Carey B, Branski RC. A novel technique for clinical assessment of laryngeal nerve conduction: normal and abnormal results. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2202–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ricz H, Bastos P, Aguiar-Ricz L, Marques W Jr, Mamede RC. Electrophysiologic activity of the vestibular fold. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(6):616–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reidenbach MM. The muscular tissue of the vestibular folds of the larynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(7):365–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orlando Guntinas-Lichius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Volk, G.F., Guntinas-Lichius, O. (2018). Electrophysiological Assessment. In: Sittel, C., Guntinas-Lichius, O. (eds) Neurolaryngology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61724-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61724-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61722-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61724-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics